From OntologPSMW

Jump to: navigation, search
[ ]


OpenOntologyRepository: OOR Team Conference Call - Fri 2011_07_15     (1)

This is a regular (monthly) OOR team conference call, please also refer to the proceedings of the last meeting(s) at: OOR/ConferenceCall_2011_06_03 & OOR/ConferenceCall_2011_07_08     (1A)

  • RSVP to appreciated, ... or simply just by adding yourself to the "Expected Attendee" list below (if you are a member of the team.)     (1B6)
  • Please note that this session may be recorded, and if so, the audio archive is expected to be made available as open content, along with the proceedings of the call to our community membership and the public at-large under our prevailing open IPR policy.     (1B8)

Attendees     (1C)

  • Expecting:     (1C2)
    • ... if you are coming to the session, please add your name above (plus your affiliation, if you aren't already a member of the community) above; or e-mail <> so that we can reserve enough resources to support everyone's participation. ...     (1C3A)

Agenda Ideas     (1D)

(Please insert your agenda ideas below ...)     (1D1)

Agenda & Proceedings     (1E)

1. Meeting called to order:     (1E2)

2. Roll Call:     (1E6)

3. Status Review and Discussion:     (1E9)

Key items for review and discussion today     (1E11)

  • Discussion: ... (we only had time to discuss the following important issue at this call, everything else were postponed.)     (1E11G)
    • Peter: we don't have the resources and bandwidth to really fork and support a customizedversion of BioPortal while we continue our development efforts     (1E11G1)
      • we also should put priority into operating a highly available, persistent, "production" ontology repository that is open to all (users, domains, etc.), as that is, I believe, the primary premise of the OOR effort ... enhancements and value added services should be predicated upon our being able to serve that first.     (1E11G1A)
    • Consider two tracks: (a) production track using plain vanila up-to-date BioPortal (with mostly just a logo change), and (b) a parallel development track continuing with what we are doing now     (1E11G2)
    • Ken / Peter: we should design in "import from BioPortal" to allow a smooth migration in the future     (1E11G3)
    • Ken / Leo: note the linkage and dependencies between BioPortal and Protege     (1E11G4)
    • Peter / Mike: providing a repository for vocabularies of the LOD community would be a valuable service     (1E11G5)
    • Mike: valuable to be a registry just in and of itself     (1E11G6)
    • Tim: we approach OOR more from a user perspective; given limited volunteered resources we have, the proposals above seem reasonable     (1E11G7)
    • [decision] ALL: we will adopt the two-track plan above; and will discuss further, on implementation issues, at the next OOR-team conference call on 2011.08.05     (1E11G8)

items below are from the previous meeting(s) and will be updated as we proceed with this meeting.     (1E11H)

4. Member activities updates:     (1E11S)

they'd like to see     (1E11U)

5. Funding progress:     (1E11W)

6. Any Other Business:     (1E11X)

7. Action items:     (1E11Y)

8. Schedule Next Meeting & Adjourn:     (1E11Z)

notes taken by: Peter P. Yim / 2011.07.15-7:13am PDT     (1E11AD)

All participants, please review and edit to enhance accuracy and granularity of the documented proceedings.     (1E11AE)

Resources     (1F)

This page has been migrated from the OntologWiki - Click here for original page     (1F15)