Search results

* Panel Discussion: "SUMO, [[OpenCyc]] Upper Ontology & DOLCE: Compare and Contrast" - [[OntologDiscussion/CommonUpperOntologies]] - pro ...this AFTER we have had individual speaker sessions specifically on Cyc and DOLCE

A library of foundational ontologies, such as [[DOLCE]], [[BFO]], [[SUMO]], and [[GFO]] was already envisioned in the [http://won

Artifact (name/version): DOLCE - Artifact Ref. (url): http://www.loa-cnr.it/DOLCE.html

...tologies in existence today, including [[SUMO]], OpenCyc Upper Ontology, [[DOLCE]], and many others emerging from the OWL community and application areas su ** Nicola Guarino - [http://www.loa-cnr.it/Ontologies.html DOLCE] - '''[http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/UpperOntologySummit/UO-Summit-Meet

DOLCE

...oGangemi|Aldo Gangemi]] - [http://www.loa-cnr.it/Papers/ODBASE-CONTEXT.pdf DOLCE - Description & Situation extensions] * Nicola Guarino - [[DOLCE]]

...obert Rovetto: There are and have been other top level ontologies, such as DOLCE, GFO, UFO, SUMO, Cyc, YAMATO ..._of_OAEI_2018_matching_systems/links/5e339b5392851c7f7f0eb36d/Matching-BFO-DOLCE-GFO-and-SUMO-an-evaluation-of-OAEI-2018-matching-systems.pdf

** suggest we focus the discussion to the 3 UO's (Cyc, SUMO & DOLCE) on how they can be merged, or if that is not feasible, how we could addres ** DOLCE & ISO 15926

...r.it/Ontoclean) and the DOLCE foundational ontology (http://www.loa-cnr.it/DOLCE).

** Title: ''Experiences in developing with DOLCE'' [https://bit.ly/2OGusCt Slides] ...nal ontologies. Without describing the ontological distinctions adopted in DOLCE, in this talk I will discuss the main principles that guided its developmen

"Embedding under existing upper/foundational ontologies such as DOLCE, SUMO, Upper Cyc, Artifact (name/version): DOLCE

* 8:30am Nicola Guarino - DOLCE (with Barry and Aldo if desired) * 1:30pm Nicola Guarino - DOLCE (with Barry and Aldo if desired)

*** Nicola Guarino on [[DOLCE]], possibly also BillAnderson or [[ChrisWelty|Chris Welty]] (suggested by [ *** a panel with speaker representating: [[SUMO]], OpenCyc Upper Ontology, [[DOLCE]], ... (suggested by PeterYim)

...tologies in existence today, including [[SUMO]], OpenCyc Upper Ontology, [[DOLCE]], and many others emerging from the OWL community and application areas su * DOLCE applications - Nicola Guarino - '''[http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/Upper

*Existing ontologies - BFO, DOLCE, FIBO, ....

*** Nicola Guarino on [[DOLCE]], possibly also BillAnderson or [[ChrisWelty|Chris Welty]] (suggested by [ *** a panel with speaker representating: [[SUMO]], OpenCyc Upper Ontology, [[DOLCE]], ... (suggested by PeterYim)

...community. His talk is entitled: "'''Making basic ontological choices: the DOLCE experience'''" ...community. His talk is entitled: "'''Making basic ontological choices: the DOLCE experience'''"

...Peter P. Yim]]: would really hope to have a Nicola Guarino presentation on DOLCE at Ontolog between now and then, and really hope we can have Nicola over in ...[[AldoGangemi|Aldo Gangemi]] ("Descriptions and Situations" extensions of DOLCE), [[DougLenat|Doug Lenat]], [[DagobertSoergel|Dagobert Soergel]], [[PatCass

*** Nicola Guarino on [[DOLCE]], possibly also BillAnderson or [[ChrisWelty|Chris Welty]] (suggested by [ *** a panel with speaker representating: [[SUMO]], OpenCyc Upper Ontology, [[DOLCE]], ... (suggested by PeterYim)

*** Nicola Guarino on [[DOLCE]], possibly also BillAnderson or [[ChrisWelty|Chris Welty]] (suggested by [ *** a panel with speaker representating: [[SUMO]], OpenCyc Upper Ontology, [[DOLCE]], ... (suggested by PeterYim)

*** Nicola Guarino on [[DOLCE]], possibly also BillAnderson or [[ChrisWelty|Chris Welty]] (suggested by [ *** a panel with speaker representating: [[SUMO]], OpenCyc Upper Ontology, [[DOLCE]], ... (suggested by PeterYim)

*** Nicola Guarino on [[DOLCE]], possibly also [[BillAndersen|Bill Andersen]] or [[ChrisWelty|Chris Welty ** a panel with speaker representating: [[SUMO]], OpenCyc Upper Ontology, [[DOLCE]], ... (suggested by PeterYim)

*** Cyc, SUMO and DOLCE will go first

*** Nicola Guarino on [[DOLCE]], possibly also BillAnderson or [[ChrisWelty|Chris Welty]] (suggested by [ *** a panel with speaker representating: [[SUMO]], OpenCyc Upper Ontology, [[DOLCE]], ... (suggested by PeterYim)

...(http://www.ifomis.uni-saarland.de/bfo/) and DOLCE (http://www.loa-cnr.it/DOLCE.html) ontologies. Other elements were added that were not in any of the st

*** Nicola Guarino on [[DOLCE]], possibly also [[BillAndersen|Bill Andersen]] or [[ChrisWelty|Chris Welty ** a panel with speaker representating: [[SUMO]], OpenCyc Upper Ontology, [[DOLCE]], ... (suggested by PeterYim)

on UDEF, SUMO, and DOLCE. They seem to have forgotten or overlooked Adam and

Basic Formal Ontology ([[BFO]]) and [[DOLCE]]) to the simple lists of user-defined [[DOLCE]], [[SUMO]]), biomedical ontologies (e.g., Gene Ontology, SNOMED CT,

* CYC, [[SUMO]], [[DOLCE]], [[PSL]], BFO, GUM, ISO-15926

*** Nicola Guarino on [[DOLCE]], possibly also [[BillAndersen|Bill Andersen]] or [[ChrisWelty|Chris Welty *** a panel with speaker representating: [[SUMO]], OpenCyc Upper Ontology, [[DOLCE]], ... (suggested by PeterYim)

*** Nicola Guarino on [[DOLCE]], possibly also [[BillAndersen|Bill Andersen]] or [[ChrisWelty|Chris Welty ** a panel with speaker representating: [[SUMO]], OpenCyc Upper Ontology, [[DOLCE]], ... (suggested by PeterYim)

*** Nicola Guarino on [[DOLCE]], possibly also BillAnderson or [[ChrisWelty|Chris Welty]] (suggested by [ *** a panel with speaker representating: [[SUMO]], OpenCyc Upper Ontology, [[DOLCE]], ... (suggested by PeterYim)

*** Nicola Guarino on [[DOLCE]], possibly also [[BillAndersen|Bill Andersen]] or [[ChrisWelty|Chris Welty ** a panel with speaker representating: [[SUMO]], OpenCyc Upper Ontology, [[DOLCE]], ... (suggested by PeterYim)

*** Nicola Guarino on [[DOLCE]], possibly also [[BillAndersen|Bill Andersen]] or [[ChrisWelty|Chris Welty ** a panel with speaker representating: [[SUMO]], OpenCyc Upper Ontology, [[DOLCE]], ... (suggested by PeterYim)

*** Nicola Guarino on [[DOLCE]], possibly also [[BillAndersen|Bill Andersen]] or [[ChrisWelty|Chris Welty ** a panel with speaker representating: [[SUMO]], OpenCyc Upper Ontology, [[DOLCE]], ... (suggested by PeterYim)

...owardMason|Howard Mason]] or [[SeanBarker|Sean Barker]]; Italian Telecom / DOLCE's (Guarino's) clients/users; Building Information / [[DeborahMacPherson]] o

*** Nicola Guarino on [[DOLCE]], possibly also [[BillAndersen|Bill Andersen]] or [[ChrisWelty|Chris Welty ** a panel with speaker representating: [[SUMO]], OpenCyc Upper Ontology, [[DOLCE]], ... (suggested by PeterYim)

*** Nicola Guarino on [[DOLCE]], possibly also [[BillAndersen|Bill Andersen]] or [[ChrisWelty|Chris Welty ** a panel with speaker representing: [[SUMO]], OpenCyc Upper Ontology, [[DOLCE]], ... (suggested by PeterYim/2005.01.20) -- to be discussed in more detail

* DOLCE - D & S ** DOLCE - Description & Situation extensions [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]]

* DOLCE - D & S ** DOLCE - Description & Situation extensions [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]]

He's one of the designers of DOLCE foundational ontology, and currently maintains the OWL versions and extensi commitment to a foundational ontology such as DOLCE?

* Is it reasonable to expect reuse of an entire ontology like DOLCE and Semantic Sensor Network (SSN)? 

* [[OpenCyc|CYC]], [[SUMO]], [[DOLCE]], [[PSL]], [[BFO]], [[GUM]], [http://www.tc184-sc4.org/wg3ndocs/wg3n1328/l

** Thu Feb. 2, 2006 - Nicola Guarino - "Making basic ontological choices: the DOLCE experience" - confirmed (LeoObrst) ...Nicola Guarino will be speaking on "Making basic ontological choices: the DOLCE experience." - see: ConferenceCall_2006_02_02 ... see you there. RSVP!

Artifact (name/version): DOLCE

O- humor 2. Why does DOLCE never seem to sleep?

...nal problems because you had to integrate all of the other ontologies with DOLCE? [14:01] ToddSchneider: Shirly & Torsten, did you import DOLCE or just use it for alignment?

...: Doug mentioned something like: it will be one man-year to express all of DOLCE in Cyc

Basic Formal Ontology ([[BFO]]) and [[DOLCE]]) to the simple lists of user-defined [[DOLCE]], [[SUMO]]), biomedical ontologies (e.g., Gene Ontology, SNOMED CT,

** [[AldoGangemi]] - [http://www.loa-cnr.it/Papers/ODBASE-CONTEXT.pdf DOLCE - Description & Situation extensions] ** [[NicolaGuarino]] - [[DOLCE]]

[12:50] Douglas Miles: DOLCE>

[12:37] DrRaviSharma: Doug said - using NL translation - using ... Dolce and ...Cyc's

**** Nicola Guarino on DOLCE - http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nidIQX

...ssable version of the DOLCE ontology and later by giving a formal proof of DOLCE's consistency. I now serve as co-chair (together with Till Mossakowski and

...eived image it might further evoke the idea of "women's image." (Following DOLCE and the Semantic Sensor Net an observation can be seen as invoking first a Ontologies like DOLCE are grounded on the idea that properties do not exist independently, but de

## upper-level ontologies (BFO, DOLCE, SUMO, ...)

...e development of such things as foundational top-level ontologies (such as DOLCE (2) & BFO (3)), and the availability of broad domain models (such as SWEET .../DOLCE.html Descriptive Ontology for Linguistic and Cognitive Engineering (DOLCE)]

** Thu Feb. 2, 2006 - Nicola Guarino - "DOLCE" (to-be-finalized) - confirmed (LeoObrst)

...It need not be the case that 'event' or 'state' are 'included in process'. DOLCE and Nicola Guarino has thoughts on these notions.

...mal decision in IOF about what the upper ontology is. TS recommends use of DOLCE there also.

[18:32] Gary Berg-Cross: I think that DOLCE would talk about state of redness, the state of default as qualities.

...bited the wide use of existing upper ontologies such as OpenCyc, SUMO, and DOLCE is the complexity of such knowledge representations. Without compelling ex

...owardMason|Howard Mason]] or [[SeanBarker|Sean Barker]]; Italian Telecom / DOLCE's (Guarino's) clients/users; Building Information / [[DeborahMacPherson]] o

Something like DOLCE would be a good place to start the discussion. As

Parameters take on values from­ DOLCE's concept of (quality) Regions, Functional Roles are played­ by Objects (e ...of a more abstract and expressive ontology such as DOLCE or some piece of DOLCE.

types) can be represented using Dolce's qualities without the need of classes of classes

* Upper ontologies - [[CYC]] Upper Model, [[DOLCE]], [[SUMO]], [[BFO]]

simplified version of the DOLCE concept of constituency. ...27] [[User:TorstenHahmann|Torsten Hahmann]]: @Gary: for clarification: the DOLCE ontology that Boyan presented is

ontologies (like [[BFO]], [[DOLCE]], [[PSL]], [[SUMO]], [[CYC]], etc.) fare, when put through your [11:15] [[MariCarmenSuarezFigueroa]]: We have already evaluate [[DOLCE]] with OOPS! (among other

## upper-level ontologies (BFO, DOLCE, SUMO, ...)

...are almost equally expressive. However, in the SSN ontology alignment with DOLCE is achieved by putting the Observation class in the <nowiki>DUL:SocialObjec ...logies of measurement, time, location and mobility. It is aligned with the DOLCE Ultra Lite upper ontology, and is backward-compatible with the OGC's Sensor

** DOLCE [[GaryBergCross]]: ON the relation to language DOLCE aims at "capturing the ontological stands that

**** Todd also suggests BFO and DOLCE (Pat: the latter is only useful in FOL with its axioms)

...rst: @Frank: yes, there is a great range of upper/foundational ontologies: DOLCE, SUMO, BFO, Upper Cyc, UFO, GFO, ETC. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Up

...odels, conservative extensions, and refinements. We have applied this to [[DOLCE]], which is not

...thesauri (Wordnet) to logical theories of reality (Basic Formal Ontology, DOLCE).

## upper-level ontologies (BFO, DOLCE, SUMO, ...)

**** Todd also suggests BFO and DOLCE (Pat: the latter is only useful in FOL with its axioms)

...odd Schneider]]: Ram, Where do you see foundational ontologies (e.g., BFO, DOLCE, etc.) coming into play?

...dency Parsing and Babelfy’s linking and using Semantic Web resources (e.g. DOLCE-Zero and Schema.org). FRED Features - Extract multiple NLP tasks to Knowled

reference to other upper ontology partitions, especially those in [[DOLCE]]. Also can we make better use

http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/ did for DOLCE (and other ontologies)

...lowed me to set up the small, beautiful group of people which produced the DOLCE foundational ontology, one of our best known results.

...omain ontologies, and what larger ontologies they are part of (e.g. PSL or DOLCE). I

...DL is one potential issue, but deep biding to philosophical entities (e.g. DOLCE) is another one

different paradigms (DOLCE vs. BFO vs. GFO vs. SUMO vs. you name it).

commented on SUMO, DOLCE and BFO as I have been exposed to them. My proposal is that the developers

...existing upper ontology. ''Upper'' or ''foundational ontologies'' (e.g., [[DOLCE]], [[BFO]], or [[SUMO]]) are reusable, varyingly comprehensive ontology art

...I'm hearing confidence that the former at least can be done :) See also [[DOLCE]].

...alk is entitled: "Making basic ontological choices: the DOLCE experience." DOLCE - a Descriptive Ontology for Linguistic and Cognitive Engineering - is an i