From OntologPSMW

Jump to: navigation, search
[ ]


OntologySummit2010: Present "Quality" - community input     (1)

This is the workspace for community input to the focused discussion outlined below ...     (1A)

Track Label: Quality - Subtrack Label: Present     (1B)

Track Co-champions: ArturoSanchez and AntonyGalton     (1B1)

Mission: The track mission is to survey the existing forms of quality assurance (e.g., accreditation, certification, and licensure) for programs, courses, and professionals.     (1B2)

Pertinent questions:     (1B3)

  • By what bodies, if any, are the programmes identified as having substantial ontological content currently accredited?     (1B3A)
  • By what bodies, if any, are ontology professionals currently certified?     (1B3B)
  • What other forms of quality assurance exist that may be relevant to the track mission?     (1B3C)

Discussion:     (1C)

(Please insert your remarks below. Kindly identify yourself and date you input.)     (1C1)

Comments / Feedback on Survey Questions which target Content Quality Assurance Presently: Please add your comments/feedback below (indented as shown by the sample entry below)     (1C2)

  • What are the quality criteria and measures that can be used to create curriculae relating to quality-based training for ontologists? (RaviSharma).     (1C3)