From OntologPSMW

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Text replace - "[ ]MichaelGruninger[ ]" to " Michael Grüninger ")
(Fix PurpleMediaWiki references)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by one user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
= OntologySummit2014 session-08 Track-A: Common Reusable Semantic Content-II - Thu 2014-03-06  =
+
= [[OntologySummit2014|Ontology Summit 2014]] session-08 Track-A: Common Reusable Semantic Content-II - Thu 2014-03-06  =
  
 
* Summit Theme: '''OntologySummit2014: "Big Data and Semantic Web Meet Applied Ontology"'''  
 
* Summit Theme: '''OntologySummit2014: "Big Data and Semantic Web Meet Applied Ontology"'''  
Line 30: Line 30:
 
'''Experiences in Knowledge Sharing: Lessons from research and experience in Big Data, Linked Data and Semantic Web Applications''' ... [http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2014/2014-03-06_OntologySummit2014_Common-Reusable-Semantic-Content-2/OntologySummit2014-s08_Content-2_intro--MikeBennett-GaryBergCross-AndreaWesterinen_20140306.pdf intro slides]  
 
'''Experiences in Knowledge Sharing: Lessons from research and experience in Big Data, Linked Data and Semantic Web Applications''' ... [http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2014/2014-03-06_OntologySummit2014_Common-Reusable-Semantic-Content-2/OntologySummit2014-s08_Content-2_intro--MikeBennett-GaryBergCross-AndreaWesterinen_20140306.pdf intro slides]  
  
This is our 9th OntologySummit, a joint initiative by [[Ontolog]], [[NIST]], [[NCOR]], [[NCBO]], [[IAOA]] & [[NCO_NITRD]] with the support of our co-sponsors.  
+
This is our 9th [[OntologySummit|Ontology Summit]], a joint initiative by [[Ontolog]], [[NIST]], [[NCOR]], [[NCBO]], [[IAOA]] & [[NCO_NITRD]] with the support of our co-sponsors.  
  
 
Since the beginnings of the Semantic Web, ontologies have played key roles in the design and deployment of new semantic technologies. Yet over the years, the level of collaboration between the Semantic Web and Applied Ontology communities has been much less than expected. Within Big Data applications, ontologies appear to have had little impact.  
 
Since the beginnings of the Semantic Web, ontologies have played key roles in the design and deployment of new semantic technologies. Yet over the years, the level of collaboration between the Semantic Web and Applied Ontology communities has been much less than expected. Within Big Data applications, ontologies appear to have had little impact.  
Line 36: Line 36:
 
This year's Ontology Summit is an opportunity for building bridges between the Semantic Web, Linked Data, Big Data, and Applied Ontology communities. On the one hand, the Semantic Web, Linked Data, and Big Data communities can bring a wide array of real problems (such as performance and scalability challenges and the variety problem in Big Data) and technologies (automated reasoning tools) that can make use of ontologies. On the other hand, the Applied Ontology community can bring a large body of common reusable content (ontologies) and ontological analysis techniques. Identifying and overcoming ontology engineering bottlenecks is critical for all communities.  
 
This year's Ontology Summit is an opportunity for building bridges between the Semantic Web, Linked Data, Big Data, and Applied Ontology communities. On the one hand, the Semantic Web, Linked Data, and Big Data communities can bring a wide array of real problems (such as performance and scalability challenges and the variety problem in Big Data) and technologies (automated reasoning tools) that can make use of ontologies. On the other hand, the Applied Ontology community can bring a large body of common reusable content (ontologies) and ontological analysis techniques. Identifying and overcoming ontology engineering bottlenecks is critical for all communities.  
  
OntologySummit2014 will pose and address the primary challenges in these areas of interaction among the different communities. The Summit activities will bring together insights and methods from these different communities, synthesize new insights, and disseminate knowledge across field boundaries.  
+
[[OntologySummit2014|Ontology Summit 2014]] will pose and address the primary challenges in these areas of interaction among the different communities. The Summit activities will bring together insights and methods from these different communities, synthesize new insights, and disseminate knowledge across field boundaries.  
  
 
In this session we aim to bring together the lessons learned to date and new insights on the re-use of ontology content. We have three speakers lined up to share their perspectives on ontology re-use in the contexts of knowledge representation and sharing, linked data and semantic web reasoning applications.  
 
In this session we aim to bring together the lessons learned to date and new insights on the re-use of ontology content. We have three speakers lined up to share their perspectives on ontology re-use in the contexts of knowledge representation and sharing, linked data and semantic web reasoning applications.  
Line 45: Line 45:
 
=== Briefings  ===
 
=== Briefings  ===
  
* '''Dr. JohnSowa (<nowiki>VivoMind Intelligence</nowiki>)''' - '''"Historical Perspectives: On Problems of Knowledge Sharing" ''' ... [http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2014/2014-03-06_OntologySummit2014_Common-Reusable-Semantic-Content-2/OntologySummit2014_history--problems-of-knowledge-sharing--JohnSowa_20140306.pdf slides]  
+
* '''Dr. [[JohnSowa|John F. Sowa]] (<nowiki>VivoMind Intelligence</nowiki>)''' - '''"Historical Perspectives: On Problems of Knowledge Sharing" ''' ... [http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2014/2014-03-06_OntologySummit2014_Common-Reusable-Semantic-Content-2/OntologySummit2014_history--problems-of-knowledge-sharing--JohnSowa_20140306.pdf slides]  
 
** ''Abstract:'' Documents and libraries written and read by humans have  been highly successful for the past three millennia. But differences in languages have been a major obstacle for knowledge sharing among humans. Computer systems are much faster than humans, but much  less flexible, tolerant, and knowledgeable. This talk will investigate how we can simplify and enhance knowledge sharing among computers and humans.  
 
** ''Abstract:'' Documents and libraries written and read by humans have  been highly successful for the past three millennia. But differences in languages have been a major obstacle for knowledge sharing among humans. Computer systems are much faster than humans, but much  less flexible, tolerant, and knowledgeable. This talk will investigate how we can simplify and enhance knowledge sharing among computers and humans.  
  
Line 60: Line 60:
 
:'''Session Format:''' this is a virtual session conducted over an augmented conference call  
 
:'''Session Format:''' this is a virtual session conducted over an augmented conference call  
  
* 1. Session opening and Track Introduction - co-chairs: MikeBennett, [[GaryBergCross]], AndreaWesterinen (10 min.) ...  [[ConferenceCall_2014_03_06|slides]]  
+
* 1. Session opening and Track Introduction -��co-chairs: [[MikeBennett|Mike Bennett]], [[GaryBergCross]], [[AndreaWesterinen|Andrea Westerinen]] (10 min.) ...  [[ConferenceCall_2014_03_06|slides]]  
* 2. Briefings - JohnSowa, MichelDumontier, KingsleyIdehen (~20 min. ea)  
+
* 2. Briefings - [[JohnSowa|John F. Sowa]], [[MichelDumontier|Michel Dumontier]], [[KingsleyIdehen|Kingsley Idehen]] (~20 min. ea)  
 
* 3. Q&A and Open discussion - ALL (~30 min.) ... ref. [[ConferenceCall_2014_03_06|process above]]  
 
* 3. Q&A and Open discussion - ALL (~30 min.) ... ref. [[ConferenceCall_2014_03_06|process above]]  
* 4. Wrap-up - co-chairs: MikeBennett, [[GaryBergCross]], AndreaWesterinen  
+
* 4. Wrap-up - co-chairs: [[MikeBennett|Mike Bennett]], [[GaryBergCross]], [[AndreaWesterinen|Andrea Westerinen]]
  
 
== Proceedings  ==
 
== Proceedings  ==
Line 87: Line 87:
 
------  
 
------  
  
[8:53] PeterYim: Welcome to the  
+
[8:53] [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]]: Welcome to the  
  
''' OntologySummit2014 session-08 Track-A: Common Reusable Semantic Content-II - Thu 2014-03-06 '''  
+
''' [[OntologySummit2014|Ontology Summit 2014]] session-08 Track-A: Common Reusable Semantic Content-II - Thu 2014-03-06 '''  
  
Summit Theme: Summit Theme: OntologySummit2014: "Big Data and Semantic Web Meet Applied Ontology"  
+
Summit Theme: Summit Theme: [[OntologySummit2014|Ontology Summit 2014]]: "Big Data and Semantic Web Meet Applied Ontology"  
  
 
Track-A Focus: Common Reusable Semantic Content  
 
Track-A Focus: Common Reusable Semantic Content  
Line 99: Line 99:
 
Session Co-chairs:  
 
Session Co-chairs:  
  
* Mr. MikeBennett (EDM Council, Hypercube)
+
* Mr. [[MikeBennett|Mike Bennett]] (EDM Council, Hypercube)
  
 
* Dr. [[GaryBergCross]] (SOCoP; Knowledge Strategies)
 
* Dr. [[GaryBergCross]] (SOCoP; Knowledge Strategies)
  
* Ms. AndreaWesterinen (Nine Points Solutions)  
+
* Ms. [[AndreaWesterinen|Andrea Westerinen]] (Nine Points Solutions)  
  
 
PROGRAM:
 
PROGRAM:
  
* Dr. JohnSowa (<nowiki>VivoMind Intelligence</nowiki>) - "Historical Perspectives: On Problems of Knowledge Sharing"
+
* Dr. [[JohnSowa|John F. Sowa]] (<nowiki>VivoMind Intelligence</nowiki>) - "Historical Perspectives: On Problems of Knowledge Sharing"
  
* Professor MichelDumontier (Stanford BMIR) - "Tactical Formalization of Linked Open Data"
+
* Professor [[MichelDumontier|Michel Dumontier]] (Stanford BMIR) - "Tactical Formalization of Linked Open Data"
  
* Mr. KingsleyIdehen (<nowiki>OpenLink Software</nowiki>) - "Ontology Driven Data Integration & Big Linked Open Data"  
+
* Mr. [[KingsleyIdehen|Kingsley Idehen]] (<nowiki>OpenLink Software</nowiki>) - "Ontology Driven Data Integration & Big Linked Open Data"  
  
 
Logistics:  
 
Logistics:  
Line 153: Line 153:
 
** use fully qualified url's (include http:// ) without symbols (like punctuations or parentheses, etc.) right before of after that URL  
 
** use fully qualified url's (include http:// ) without symbols (like punctuations or parentheses, etc.) right before of after that URL  
  
Attendees (in chat-room): AlanRector, AlexShkotin, AliHashemi, AmandaVizedom,  
+
Attendees (in chat-room): [[AlanRector|Alan Rector]], [[AlexShkotin|Alex Shkotin]], [[AliHashemi|Ali Hashemi]], [[AmandaVizedom|Amanda Vizedom]],  
  
AndreaWesterinen, AnneThessen, BartGajderowicz, BiplabSarker, BobbinTeegarden, BruceBray,  
+
[[AndreaWesterinen|Andrea Westerinen]], [[AnneThessen|Anne Thessen]], [[BartGajderowicz|Bart Gajderowicz]], [[BiplabSarker|Biplab Sarker]], [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]], [[BruceBray|Bruce Bray]],  
  
CarmenChui, ChristiKapp, ConradBeaulieu, CoryCasanave, DaliaVaranka, DennisWisnosky, DennisPierson,  
+
[[CarmenChui|Carmen Chui]], [[ChristiKapp|Christi Kapp]], [[ConradBeaulieu|Conrad Beaulieu]], [[CoryCasanave|Cory Casanave]], [[DaliaVaranka|Dalia Varanka]], [[DennisWisnosky|Dennis Wisnosky]], [[DennisPierson|Dennis Pierson]],  
  
EdBernot, FranLightsom, FrankOlken, [[GaryBergCross]], HensonGraves, JackRing, JamesOverton, JohnSowa,  
+
[[EdBernot|Ed Bernot]], [[FranLightsom|Fran Lightsom]], [[FrankOlken|Frank Olken]], [[GaryBergCross]], [[HensonGraves|Henson Graves]], [[JackRing|Jack Ring]], [[JamesOverton|James Overton]], [[JohnSowa|John F. Sowa]],  
  
KenBaclawski, KingsleyIdehen, KrzysztofJanowicz, LeoObrst, LesMorgan, MarcelaVegetti, MarkLinehan,  
+
[[User:KennethBaclawski|Ken Baclawski]], [[KingsleyIdehen|Kingsley Idehen]], [[KrzysztofJanowicz|Krzysztof Janowicz]], [[LeoObrst|Leo Obrst]], [[LesMorgan|Les Morgan]], [[MarcelaVegetti|Marcela Vegetti]], [[MarkLinehan|Mark Linehan]],  
  
MatthewLange, MatthewWest, MichaelGruninger, MichelDumontier, MikeBennett, MikeDean, NaicongLi,  
+
[[MatthewLange|Matthew Lange]], [[MatthewWest|Matthew West]], [[MichaelGruninger|Michael Gr&uuml;ninger]], [[MichelDumontier|Michel Dumontier]], [[MikeBennett|Mike Bennett]], [[MikeDean|Mike Dean]], [[NaicongLi|Naicong Li]],  
  
NancyWiegand, [[PatrickOBrien]], PeterYim, [[RichardMcAllister]], RobertPowers, ShahanKhatchadourian,  
+
[[NancyWiegand|Nancy Wiegand]], [[PatrickOBrien]], [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]], [[RichardMcAllister]], [[RobertPowers|Robert Powers]], [[ShahanKhatchadourian|Shahan Khatchadourian]],  
  
SimonSpero, SundayOjo, TerryLongstreth, ToddSchneider, TorstenHahmann, UriShani, WernerKuhn  
+
[[SimonSpero|Simon Spero]], [[SundayOjo|Sunday Ojo]], [[TerryLongstreth|Terry Longstreth]], [[ToddSchneider|Todd Schneider]], [[User:TorstenHahmann|Torsten Hahmann]], [[UriShani|Uri Shani]], WernerKuhn  
  
 
''' Proceedings '''  
 
''' Proceedings '''  
  
[9:16] KingsleyIdehen: Peter ?  
+
[9:16] [[KingsleyIdehen|Kingsley Idehen]]: Peter ?  
  
[9:19] anonymous morphed into ConradBeaulieu  
+
[9:19] anonymous morphed into [[ConradBeaulieu|Conrad Beaulieu]]
  
[9:26] anonymous morphed into TerryLongstreth  
+
[9:26] anonymous morphed into [[TerryLongstreth|Terry Longstreth]]
  
[9:17] KingsleyIdehen: Just checking the settings  
+
[9:17] [[KingsleyIdehen|Kingsley Idehen]]: Just checking the settings  
  
[9:26] PeterYim: Hi Kingsley ... hi, everyone!  
+
[9:26] [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]]: Hi Kingsley ... hi, everyone!  
  
[9:26] MikeBennett: Hi Peter!  
+
[9:26] [[MikeBennett|Mike Bennett]]: Hi Peter!  
  
[9:27] EdBernot: Hi Peter!  
+
[9:27] [[EdBernot|Ed Bernot]]: Hi Peter!  
  
 
[9:28] anonymous morphed into Michel  
 
[9:28] anonymous morphed into Michel  
Line 189: Line 189:
 
[9:29] anonymous morphed into Robert Powers  
 
[9:29] anonymous morphed into Robert Powers  
  
[9:29] AlexShkotin: Hi all!  
+
[9:29] [[AlexShkotin|Alex Shkotin]]: Hi all!  
  
[9:30] AlexShkotin: What about Skype?  
+
[9:30] [[AlexShkotin|Alex Shkotin]]: What about Skype?  
  
[9:30] MikeBennett: Hi Alex. Skype joinconference seems to work OK here.  
+
[9:30] [[MikeBennett|Mike Bennett]]: Hi Alex. Skype joinconference seems to work OK here.  
  
[9:32] AlexShkotin: I got it  
+
[9:32] [[AlexShkotin|Alex Shkotin]]: I got it  
  
[9:31] anonymous morphed into NaicongLi  
+
[9:31] anonymous morphed into [[NaicongLi|Naicong Li]]
  
[9:32] anonymous morphed into AndreaWesterinen  
+
[9:32] anonymous morphed into [[AndreaWesterinen|Andrea Westerinen]]
  
[9:34] anonymous morphed into CarmenChui  
+
[9:34] anonymous morphed into [[CarmenChui|Carmen Chui]]
  
[9:34] Robert Powers morphed into RobertPowers  
+
[9:34] Robert Powers morphed into [[RobertPowers|Robert Powers]]
  
[9:36] KrzysztofJanowicz: Hi  
+
[9:36] [[KrzysztofJanowicz|Krzysztof Janowicz]]: Hi  
  
 
[9:34] [[GaryBergCross]]: Michel is on the chat.  
 
[9:34] [[GaryBergCross]]: Michel is on the chat.  
  
[9:36] RobertPowers: Michel, are you on the call?  
+
[9:36] [[RobertPowers|Robert Powers]]: Michel, are you on the call?  
  
[9:36] MikeBennett: Is the Michel on the chat MichelDumontier? If so please can you change it to  
+
[9:36] [[MikeBennett|Mike Bennett]]: Is the Michel on the chat MichelDumontier? If so please can you change it to  
  
 
your full name and join us on the phone bridge if you're not already. Many thanks!  
 
your full name and join us on the phone bridge if you're not already. Many thanks!  
Line 217: Line 217:
 
[9:37] Michel: hi, just getting off a call  
 
[9:37] Michel: hi, just getting off a call  
  
[9:39] Michel morphed into MichelDumontier  
+
[9:39] Michel morphed into [[MichelDumontier|Michel Dumontier]]
  
[9:38] MikeBennett: Great!  
+
[9:38] [[MikeBennett|Mike Bennett]]: Great!  
  
[9:38] [[GaryBergCross]]: I sent JohnSowa an email to see if he is joining us..  
+
[9:38] [[GaryBergCross]]: I sent [[JohnSowa|John F. Sowa]] an email to see if he is joining us..  
  
[9:39] MatthewLange: Is the vnc server up?  
+
[9:39] [[MatthewLange|Matthew Lange]]: Is the vnc server up?  
  
[9:40] MikeBennett: Yes the VNC server is up  
+
[9:40] [[MikeBennett|Mike Bennett]]: Yes the VNC server is up  
  
[9:40] MichelDumontier: have joined the call  
+
[9:40] [[MichelDumontier|Michel Dumontier]]: have joined the call  
  
 
[9:46] [[GaryBergCross]]: No answer from the tele #s I have for JohnSowa...so still puzzled.  
 
[9:46] [[GaryBergCross]]: No answer from the tele #s I have for JohnSowa...so still puzzled.  
  
[9:47] PeterYim: JohnSowa is already on the voice line  
+
[9:47] [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]]: [[JohnSowa|John F. Sowa]] is already on the voice line  
  
 
[9:48] [[GaryBergCross]]: Ok Good .. didn't see him on chat.  
 
[9:48] [[GaryBergCross]]: Ok Good .. didn't see him on chat.  
  
[9:48] PeterYim: we might want to (verbally) prompt him, as well as others who aren't already here,  
+
[9:48] [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]]: we might want to (verbally) prompt him, as well as others who aren't already here,  
  
 
to join us in the chat-room  
 
to join us in the chat-room  
Line 241: Line 241:
 
[9:52] [[GaryBergCross]]: Welcome John....  
 
[9:52] [[GaryBergCross]]: Welcome John....  
  
[9:41] PeterYim: == MikeBennett starts the session on behalf of Session Co-chairs ... see slides  
+
[9:41] [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]]: == [[MikeBennett|Mike Bennett]] starts the session on behalf of Session Co-chairs ... see slides  
  
 
under: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2014_03_06#nid486D  
 
under: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2014_03_06#nid486D  
  
[9:41] ... anonymous morphed into LesMorgan  
+
[9:41] ... anonymous morphed into [[LesMorgan|Les Morgan]]
  
[9:43] ... anonymous morphed into BruceBray  
+
[9:43] ... anonymous morphed into [[BruceBray|Bruce Bray]]
  
 
[9:43] ... anonymous morphed into [[RichardMcAllister]]  
 
[9:43] ... anonymous morphed into [[RichardMcAllister]]  
  
[9:51] anonymous morphed into CoryCasanave  
+
[9:51] anonymous morphed into [[CoryCasanave|Cory Casanave]]
  
[9:52] MatthewWest: What counts as "small set of semantic content" and what counts as "large set of  
+
[9:52] [[MatthewWest|Matthew West]]: What counts as "small set of semantic content" and what counts as "large set of  
  
 
semantic content" on Slide 6 of the introduction?  
 
semantic content" on Slide 6 of the introduction?  
  
[9:55] AndreaWesterinen: @MatthewWest [9:52] "Small" means a design pattern with a few classes and  
+
[9:55] [[AndreaWesterinen|Andrea Westerinen]]: @MatthewWest [9:52] "Small" means a design pattern with a few classes and  
  
 
relationships. "Large" could be a complete domain or upper ontology or schema.  
 
relationships. "Large" could be a complete domain or upper ontology or schema.  
  
[9:56] SimonSpero: @MatthewWest [9:52] : small == can be visualized on an A0 poster : large = (not small)?  
+
[9:56] [[SimonSpero|Simon Spero]]: @MatthewWest [9:52] : small == can be visualized on an A0 poster : large = (not small)?  
  
 
[9:52] [[GaryBergCross]]: Welcome John....  
 
[9:52] [[GaryBergCross]]: Welcome John....  
  
[9:56] PeterYim: == JohnSowa presenting ...  
+
[9:56] [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]]: == [[JohnSowa|John F. Sowa]] presenting ...  
  
[9:56] ... anonymous morphed into BobbinTeegarden  
+
[9:56] ... anonymous morphed into [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]]
  
 
[10:01] [[GaryBergCross]]: Lack of Semantic app software not well integrated with mainstream IT is a  
 
[10:01] [[GaryBergCross]]: Lack of Semantic app software not well integrated with mainstream IT is a  
Line 273: Line 273:
 
major problem as shown on slide 5.  
 
major problem as shown on slide 5.  
  
[10:03] AnneThessen: I completely agree with JohnSowa slide 6 ["We need better tools, interfaces,  
+
[10:03] [[AnneThessen|Anne Thessen]]: I completely agree with [[JohnSowa|John F. Sowa]] slide 6 ["We need better tools, interfaces,  
  
 
and methodologies ..."]  
 
and methodologies ..."]  
Line 279: Line 279:
 
[10:04] [[GaryBergCross]]: This is a topic for the Tool track to address.  
 
[10:04] [[GaryBergCross]]: This is a topic for the Tool track to address.  
  
[10:03] MikeBennett: ... slide 8  
+
[10:03] [[MikeBennett|Mike Bennett]]: ... slide 8  
  
[10:04] MikeBennett: ... slide 9  
+
[10:04] [[MikeBennett|Mike Bennett]]: ... slide 9  
  
[10:04] MikeBennett: John please call out the slide numbers  
+
[10:04] [[MikeBennett|Mike Bennett]]: John please call out the slide numbers  
  
[10:05] PeterYim: @MikeBennett ... please try to prompt JohnSowa verbally  
+
[10:05] [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]]: @MikeBennett ... please try to prompt [[JohnSowa|John F. Sowa]] verbally  
  
[10:09] PeterYim: ... on slide#14 now  
+
[10:09] [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]]: ... on slide#14 now  
  
[10:13] PeterYim: ... on slide#16 now  
+
[10:13] [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]]: ... on slide#16 now  
  
[10:13] AmandaVizedom: Question for @JohnSowa (we are on slide 11, but q applies to this whole range  
+
[10:13] [[AmandaVizedom|Amanda Vizedom]]: Question for @JohnSowa (we are on slide 11, but q applies to this whole range  
  
 
of slides): In my experience, being familiar with the history of logic & these fundamentals is  
 
of slides): In my experience, being familiar with the history of logic & these fundamentals is  
Line 305: Line 305:
 
is helpful to overcoming obstacles to reuse?  
 
is helpful to overcoming obstacles to reuse?  
  
[10:16] AlexShkotin: @AmandaVizedom, we should not repeat their errors;-)  
+
[10:16] [[AlexShkotin|Alex Shkotin]]: @AmandaVizedom, we should not repeat their errors;-)  
  
 
[10:19] [[GaryBergCross]]: @AmandaVizedom Great question for John. I hope we get to it in discussion.  
 
[10:19] [[GaryBergCross]]: @AmandaVizedom Great question for John. I hope we get to it in discussion.  
  
[10:14] PeterYim: ... on slide#17 now  
+
[10:14] [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]]: ... on slide#17 now  
  
 
[10:18] ... anonymous morphed into [[PatrickOBrien]]  
 
[10:18] ... anonymous morphed into [[PatrickOBrien]]  
  
[10:18] PeterYim: ... on slide#19 now  
+
[10:18] [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]]: ... on slide#19 now  
  
[10:18] AliHashemi: ... (i believe it's slide 21)  
+
[10:18] [[AliHashemi|Ali Hashemi]]: ... (i believe it's slide 21)  
  
[10:19] PeterYim: ... on slide#22 now  
+
[10:19] [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]]: ... on slide#22 now  
  
[10:20] AlexShkotin / MikeBennett: ... slide 24  
+
[10:20] [[AlexShkotin|Alex Shkotin]] / [[MikeBennett|Mike Bennett]]: ... slide 24  
  
 
[10:20] [[GaryBergCross]]: John is getting at problems of reusing some well know resources like WordNet.  
 
[10:20] [[GaryBergCross]]: John is getting at problems of reusing some well know resources like WordNet.  
  
[10:21] PeterYim: ... on slide#28 now [10:21] [[GaryBergCross]]: [ ref. slide#29: "Enable subject-matter  
+
[10:21] [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]]: ... on slide#28 now [10:21] [[GaryBergCross]]: [ ref. slide#29: "Enable subject-matter  
  
 
experts to review, update, and extend their knowledge bases with little or no assistance from IT  
 
experts to review, update, and extend their knowledge bases with little or no assistance from IT  
Line 329: Line 329:
 
specialists" ] Uh oh.. getting rid of the KE means unemployment for some of us...  
 
specialists" ] Uh oh.. getting rid of the KE means unemployment for some of us...  
  
[10:22] CoryCasanave: Many (most?) domain experts have no notation, what is the notation of law enforcement?  
+
[10:22] [[CoryCasanave|Cory Casanave]]: Many (most?) domain experts have no notation, what is the notation of law enforcement?  
  
[10:22] SimonSpero: @CoryCasanave: UCR (Uniform Crime Reporting)  
+
[10:22] [[SimonSpero|Simon Spero]]: @CoryCasanave: UCR (Uniform Crime Reporting)  
  
[10:23] SimonSpero: @CoryCasanave: 10-codes  
+
[10:23] [[SimonSpero|Simon Spero]]: @CoryCasanave: 10-codes  
  
[10:24] CoryCasanave: @Simon, they do have domain vocabularies - but most lack ways to express them  
+
[10:24] [[CoryCasanave|Cory Casanave]]: @Simon, they do have domain vocabularies - but most lack ways to express them  
  
 
other than text and spreadsheets  
 
other than text and spreadsheets  
  
[10:26] MikeBennett: @CoryCasanave [10:22] if you walk into any conference room there are whiteboard  
+
[10:26] [[MikeBennett|Mike Bennett]]: @CoryCasanave [10:22] if you walk into any conference room there are whiteboard  
  
 
diagrams with boxes and lines. So presenting subject matter in edges and lines, with textual  
 
diagrams with boxes and lines. So presenting subject matter in edges and lines, with textual  
Line 345: Line 345:
 
annotation, should be a relatively universal SME format.  
 
annotation, should be a relatively universal SME format.  
  
[10:30] CoryCasanave: @MikeBennett, some people respond to ad-hoc boxes and lines, some don't. Fewer  
+
[10:30] [[CoryCasanave|Cory Casanave]]: @MikeBennett, some people respond to ad-hoc boxes and lines, some don't. Fewer  
  
respond to boxes and lines with any semantic consistency [10:31] MikeBennett: @CoryCasanave very  
+
respond to boxes and lines with any semantic consistency [10:31] [[MikeBennett|Mike Bennett]]: @CoryCasanave very  
  
 
true - in any group there are those whose primary modality is visual, and those whose is verbal.  
 
true - in any group there are those whose primary modality is visual, and those whose is verbal.  
Line 355: Line 355:
 
both.  
 
both.  
  
[10:36] JohnSowa: @MikeBennett, I strongly support spreadsheets. That's another example of a  
+
[10:36] [[JohnSowa|John F. Sowa]]: @MikeBennett, I strongly support spreadsheets. That's another example of a  
  
 
modality that requires almost zero learning to start using effectively.  
 
modality that requires almost zero learning to start using effectively.  
  
[10:38] MikeBennett: @JohnSowa I've seen some very complex SME spreadsheets - but it's their  
+
[10:38] [[MikeBennett|Mike Bennett]]: @JohnSowa I've seen some very complex SME spreadsheets - but it's their  
  
 
complexity not ours. I think there's potential in a spreadsheet structure that reflects classes,  
 
complexity not ours. I think there's potential in a spreadsheet structure that reflects classes,  
Line 365: Line 365:
 
properties (with real-world names on the columns, not OWL terms)  
 
properties (with real-world names on the columns, not OWL terms)  
  
[10:41] JohnSowa: @MikeBennett (and continuation of note to @DennisWisnosky), then I would derive as  
+
[10:41] [[JohnSowa|John F. Sowa]]: @MikeBennett (and continuation of note to @DennisWisnosky), then I would derive as  
  
 
much of the knowledge as possible from available data of any kind -- structured and unstructured.  
 
much of the knowledge as possible from available data of any kind -- structured and unstructured.  
Line 371: Line 371:
 
The primary role of the SME would be to answer questions to help the automated tools work better.  
 
The primary role of the SME would be to answer questions to help the automated tools work better.  
  
[10:24] DennisWisnosky: Why documents feeding the NL Tools. Why not some SIRI?  
+
[10:24] [[DennisWisnosky|Dennis Wisnosky]]: Why documents feeding the NL Tools. Why not some SIRI?  
  
[10:30] JohnSowa: @DennisWisnosky, I mentioned documents because the bulk of the knowledge is in  
+
[10:30] [[JohnSowa|John F. Sowa]]: @DennisWisnosky, I mentioned documents because the bulk of the knowledge is in  
  
 
documents. But I would certainly recommend SIRI or similar voice-based tools as an option --  
 
documents. But I would certainly recommend SIRI or similar voice-based tools as an option --  
Line 379: Line 379:
 
especially for hands-free use by the SMEs.  
 
especially for hands-free use by the SMEs.  
  
[10:24] AmandaVizedom: About @JohnSowa's slide 20: I would (do, have done) argue that the quest for  
+
[10:24] [[AmandaVizedom|Amanda Vizedom]]: About @JohnSowa's slide 20: I would (do, have done) argue that the quest for  
  
 
a complete ontology has been an significant hindrance to the development of reusable ontologies.  
 
a complete ontology has been an significant hindrance to the development of reusable ontologies.  
Line 393: Line 393:
 
emphasis of our ontologies clear and detectable.  
 
emphasis of our ontologies clear and detectable.  
  
[10:27] JohnSowa: @Amanda, short answer: what we can learn from history is the requirement that  
+
[10:27] [[JohnSowa|John F. Sowa]]: @Amanda, short answer: what we can learn from history is the requirement that  
  
 
tools must be designed for the SMEs to use without additional training. We still need KEs, but not  
 
tools must be designed for the SMEs to use without additional training. We still need KEs, but not  
Line 399: Line 399:
 
in the middle between the SME and the system. There is much more to say, but that's another topic.  
 
in the middle between the SME and the system. There is much more to say, but that's another topic.  
  
[10:30] ToddSchneider: @JohnSowa, in your assertion that 'systems have been inter-operating for ...'  
+
[10:30] [[ToddSchneider|Todd Schneider]]: @JohnSowa, in your assertion that 'systems have been inter-operating for ...'  
  
 
many years leaves out the process to get them to inter-operate. The ability to get information (and  
 
many years leaves out the process to get them to inter-operate. The ability to get information (and  
Line 405: Line 405:
 
other) systems to inter-operate in a timely and cost effective manner is still a challenge.  
 
other) systems to inter-operate in a timely and cost effective manner is still a challenge.  
  
[10:34] JohnSowa: @ToddSchneider, I agree. Semantics has helped us develop better systems. But more  
+
[10:34] [[JohnSowa|John F. Sowa]]: @ToddSchneider, I agree. Semantics has helped us develop better systems. But more  
  
 
people would use more and better semantics if the learning curve were less steep.  
 
people would use more and better semantics if the learning curve were less steep.  
  
[10:40] ToddSchneider: @JohnSowa, I agree. If engineers had more training in logic and ontological  
+
[10:40] [[ToddSchneider|Todd Schneider]]: @JohnSowa, I agree. If engineers had more training in logic and ontological  
  
 
analysis would help in this regard. However, somethings are difficult to understand (e.g., Saharon  
 
analysis would help in this regard. However, somethings are difficult to understand (e.g., Saharon  
Line 419: Line 419:
 
information.  
 
information.  
  
[10:35] DennisWisnosky: @JohnSowa - you don't discuss the bias of the SME's and the bias of the  
+
[10:35] [[DennisWisnosky|Dennis Wisnosky]]: @JohnSowa - you don't discuss the bias of the SME's and the bias of the  
  
 
Knowledge person to bias the KB = ontology. I believe that just as in other domains - e.g.  
 
Knowledge person to bias the KB = ontology. I believe that just as in other domains - e.g.  
Line 425: Line 425:
 
manufacturing the only way truth will will-out is to eliminate the human.  
 
manufacturing the only way truth will will-out is to eliminate the human.  
  
[10:38] JohnSowa: Dennis, I didn't even have time to mention all my slides. If by "eliminating the  
+
[10:38] [[JohnSowa|John F. Sowa]]: Dennis, I didn't even have time to mention all my slides. If by "eliminating the  
  
 
human" you mean that as much as possible of the knowledge be derived from available resources (Big  
 
human" you mean that as much as possible of the knowledge be derived from available resources (Big  
Line 431: Line 431:
 
Data),  
 
Data),  
  
[10:43] DennisWisnosky: @JohnSowa - Yes, just saw your last sting and I agree. In addition, first I  
+
[10:43] [[DennisWisnosky|Dennis Wisnosky]]: @JohnSowa - Yes, just saw your last sting and I agree. In addition, first I  
  
 
am buying totally that a NL processor takes the place of the knowledge worker = the ontologist,  
 
am buying totally that a NL processor takes the place of the knowledge worker = the ontologist,  
Line 441: Line 441:
 
make sense. This may happen in real time, or analyzing what the data store as it is amassed.  
 
make sense. This may happen in real time, or analyzing what the data store as it is amassed.  
  
[10:46] AndreaWesterinen: @DennisWisnosky [10:43] NL processing really only works if it understands  
+
[10:46] [[AndreaWesterinen|Andrea Westerinen]]: @DennisWisnosky [10:43] NL processing really only works if it understands  
  
 
the language of the domain of the SME. This is not generic. At this point in time, getting the  
 
the language of the domain of the SME. This is not generic. At this point in time, getting the  
Line 449: Line 449:
 
SMEs.  
 
SMEs.  
  
[10:47] JohnSowa: I am not advocating full NL understanding. But current tools can derive enough  
+
[10:47] [[JohnSowa|John F. Sowa]]: I am not advocating full NL understanding. But current tools can derive enough  
  
 
from documents (or speech) to formulate intelligent questions when they need help.  
 
from documents (or speech) to formulate intelligent questions when they need help.  
  
[10:48] AndreaWesterinen: @JohnSowa [10:47] That has not been my experience - unless you have  
+
[10:48] [[AndreaWesterinen|Andrea Westerinen]]: @JohnSowa [10:47] That has not been my experience - unless you have  
  
 
knowledge of the domain and its language.  
 
knowledge of the domain and its language.  
  
[10:48] JohnSowa: @AndreaWesterinen For examples of the way systems can learn by reading, see  
+
[10:48] [[JohnSowa|John F. Sowa]]: @AndreaWesterinen For examples of the way systems can learn by reading, see  
  
http://www.jfsowa.com/talks/goal7.pdf [10:45] JohnSowa: @ToddSchneider and @DennisWisnosky, I  
+
http://www.jfsowa.com/talks/goal7.pdf [10:45] [[JohnSowa|John F. Sowa]]: @ToddSchneider and @DennisWisnosky, I  
  
 
believe that highly trained experts already know the best way to talk about their field. They should  
 
believe that highly trained experts already know the best way to talk about their field. They should  
Line 465: Line 465:
 
not have to learn any conventions that we want them to use.  
 
not have to learn any conventions that we want them to use.  
  
[11:08] ToddSchneider: @JohnSowa, "highly trained experts already know the best way to talk about  
+
[11:08] [[ToddSchneider|Todd Schneider]]: @JohnSowa, "highly trained experts already know the best way to talk about  
  
 
their field", but only within their field. If there's a need to communicate outside their field  
 
their field", but only within their field. If there's a need to communicate outside their field  
  
(i.e. inter-operate), then there's a problem. [11:17] JohnSowa: @ToddSchneider, I agree that many  
+
(i.e. inter-operate), then there's a problem. [11:17] [[JohnSowa|John F. Sowa]]: @ToddSchneider, I agree that many  
  
 
experts don't communicate effectively with people in other fields. But the problem for anybody,  
 
experts don't communicate effectively with people in other fields. But the problem for anybody,  
Line 479: Line 479:
 
schemas the way Michel did for the relation between drug disease pathway and gene?  
 
schemas the way Michel did for the relation between drug disease pathway and gene?  
  
[10:23] PeterYim: == MichelDumontier presenting ...  
+
[10:23] [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]]: == [[MichelDumontier|Michel Dumontier]] presenting ...  
  
[10:31] AmandaVizedom: @MichelDumontier, very glad to have presentation that starts from deep  
+
[10:31] [[AmandaVizedom|Amanda Vizedom]]: @MichelDumontier, very glad to have presentation that starts from deep  
  
 
awareness of how much is out there (as in LOV) and moves through experiences with trying to reuse  
 
awareness of how much is out there (as in LOV) and moves through experiences with trying to reuse  
Line 487: Line 487:
 
it. Thanks for contributing this.  
 
it. Thanks for contributing this.  
  
[10:50] MichelDumontier: @AmandaVizedom thanks for your comment :)  
+
[10:50] [[MichelDumontier|Michel Dumontier]]: @AmandaVizedom thanks for your comment :)  
  
[10:54] AmandaVizedom: @MichelDumontier, You're welcome. Many are confronting such tactical issues  
+
[10:54] [[AmandaVizedom|Amanda Vizedom]]: @MichelDumontier, You're welcome. Many are confronting such tactical issues  
  
 
now, I think. Folks increasingly start with a plan to reuse, but find it nowhere near as simple as  
 
now, I think. Folks increasingly start with a plan to reuse, but find it nowhere near as simple as  
Line 495: Line 495:
 
they expected. Gory details of how people manage reuse successfully are valuable!  
 
they expected. Gory details of how people manage reuse successfully are valuable!  
  
[10:42] AmandaVizedom: Something going unstated here wrt this discussion of tools for KE / ontology  
+
[10:42] [[AmandaVizedom|Amanda Vizedom]]: Something going unstated here wrt this discussion of tools for KE / ontology  
  
 
development and the question of reusable content / reuse of content. I'm not saying that they are  
 
development and the question of reusable content / reuse of content. I'm not saying that they are  
Line 507: Line 507:
 
formalization for specific reuse.  
 
formalization for specific reuse.  
  
[10:51] MichelDumontier: @Gary Thanks!  
+
[10:51] [[MichelDumontier|Michel Dumontier]]: @Gary Thanks!  
  
[10:49] PeterYim: @MichelDumontier - for what you are trying to achieve, does limitations of  
+
[10:49] [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]]: @MichelDumontier - for what you are trying to achieve, does limitations of  
  
 
expressivity of the ontology language (OWL in your case) come into the picture  
 
expressivity of the ontology language (OWL in your case) come into the picture  
  
[10:52] MichelDumontier: @PeterYim so far we have been quite happy with OWL for consistency checking  
+
[10:52] [[MichelDumontier|Michel Dumontier]]: @PeterYim so far we have been quite happy with OWL for consistency checking  
  
 
(OWL-DL profile) and query answering (OWL-EL profile)  
 
(OWL-DL profile) and query answering (OWL-EL profile)  
  
[10:54] MichelDumontier: @PeterYim As we look towards more *accurate* representations of source  
+
[10:54] [[MichelDumontier|Michel Dumontier]]: @PeterYim As we look towards more *accurate* representations of source  
  
 
knowledge, however, may require something else  
 
knowledge, however, may require something else  
  
[10:55] PeterYim: @MichelDumontier, thanks ... what are the "something else" being considered now?  
+
[10:55] [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]]: @MichelDumontier, thanks ... what are the "something else" being considered now?  
  
[10:57] PeterYim: Thank you, @MichelDumontier  
+
[10:57] [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]]: Thank you, @MichelDumontier  
  
[10:57] MichelDumontier: @PeterYim probabilistic reasoning (from aggregation and evidence type),  
+
[10:57] [[MichelDumontier|Michel Dumontier]]: @PeterYim probabilistic reasoning (from aggregation and evidence type),  
  
 
non-monotonic reasoning (for inconsistent kbs)  
 
non-monotonic reasoning (for inconsistent kbs)  
Line 535: Line 535:
 
Biomedicine?  
 
Biomedicine?  
  
[10:57] MichelDumontier: @[[GaryBergCross]] yes. can be used with any terminology.  
+
[10:57] [[MichelDumontier|Michel Dumontier]]: @[[GaryBergCross]] yes. can be used with any terminology.  
  
 
https://code.google.com/p/ontofunc/  
 
https://code.google.com/p/ontofunc/  
  
[10:56] RobertPowers: @MichelDumontier Could category theory/ologs be an answer to the problem of  
+
[10:56] [[RobertPowers|Robert Powers]]: @MichelDumontier Could category theory/ologs be an answer to the problem of  
  
 
representation you show in slide 11?  
 
representation you show in slide 11?  
  
[11:01] MichelDumontier: @RobertPowers two factors - initial RDF was minimal (model 1) because  
+
[11:01] [[MichelDumontier|Michel Dumontier]]: @RobertPowers two factors - initial RDF was minimal (model 1) because  
  
 
triple stores didn't scale, and different datasets do not necessarily collect all the data that  
 
triple stores didn't scale, and different datasets do not necessarily collect all the data that  
Line 555: Line 555:
 
http://www.jbiomedsem.com/content/5/1/14/abstract  
 
http://www.jbiomedsem.com/content/5/1/14/abstract  
  
[11:04] RobertPowers: @MichelDumontier Yes, thx Michel!  
+
[11:04] [[RobertPowers|Robert Powers]]: @MichelDumontier Yes, thx Michel!  
  
[11:03] SimonSpero: @MichelDumontier OASIS Quantities and Units of Measure Ontology Standard  
+
[11:03] [[SimonSpero|Simon Spero]]: @MichelDumontier OASIS Quantities and Units of Measure Ontology Standard  
  
 
(QUOMOS) TC https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=quomos  
 
(QUOMOS) TC https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=quomos  
  
[11:06] AndreaWesterinen: @MichelDumontier There is also Quantities, Units, Dimensions and Data  
+
[11:06] [[AndreaWesterinen|Andrea Westerinen]]: @MichelDumontier There is also Quantities, Units, Dimensions and Data  
  
 
Types Ontologies (QUDT) ... http://www.qudt.org/  
 
Types Ontologies (QUDT) ... http://www.qudt.org/  
  
[11:22] MichelDumontier: @AndreaWesterinen @SimonSpero - indeed there are now many standards! but  
+
[11:22] [[MichelDumontier|Michel Dumontier]]: @AndreaWesterinen @SimonSpero - indeed there are now many standards! but  
  
 
now what?  
 
now what?  
  
[10:50] PeterYim: == KingsleyIdehen presenting ...  
+
[10:50] [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]]: == [[KingsleyIdehen|Kingsley Idehen]] presenting ...  
  
[10:49] MatthewWest: ... *7 to unmute  
+
[10:49] [[MatthewWest|Matthew West]]: ... *7 to unmute  
  
[10:49] KingsleyIdehen: ... Yes  
+
[10:49] [[KingsleyIdehen|Kingsley Idehen]]: ... Yes  
  
[10:50] MatthewWest: ... @Mike - we could hear you.  
+
[10:50] [[MatthewWest|Matthew West]]: ... @Mike - we could hear you.  
  
[10:50] MikeBennett: ... Thanks @Matthew, I thought I had gone missing for a bit :)  
+
[10:50] [[MikeBennett|Mike Bennett]]: ... Thanks @Matthew, I thought I had gone missing for a bit :)  
  
[10:49] KingsleyIdehen: All: http://kidehen.blogspot.com/2014/02/class-equivalence-based-reasoning.html  
+
[10:49] [[KingsleyIdehen|Kingsley Idehen]]: All: http://kidehen.blogspot.com/2014/02/class-equivalence-based-reasoning.html  
  
 
-- example that includes live examples in regards to my session re. ontology driven integration of  
 
-- example that includes live examples in regards to my session re. ontology driven integration of  
Line 589: Line 589:
 
Glossary of terms: http://bit.ly/1cchBvV .  
 
Glossary of terms: http://bit.ly/1cchBvV .  
  
[10:57] PeterYim: ... on slide#7 now  
+
[10:57] [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]]: ... on slide#7 now  
  
 
[11:00] [[GaryBergCross]]: @KingsleyIdehen Thanks for framing this practical issue of the dilemma for  
 
[11:00] [[GaryBergCross]]: @KingsleyIdehen Thanks for framing this practical issue of the dilemma for  
Line 599: Line 599:
 
but with a "conceptual model" of the domain under consideration.  
 
but with a "conceptual model" of the domain under consideration.  
  
[11:04] MatthewWest: ... Apologies, I have to leave.  
+
[11:04] [[MatthewWest|Matthew West]]: ... Apologies, I have to leave.  
  
[11:05] PeterYim: ... bye, MatthewWest  
+
[11:05] [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]]: ... bye, [[MatthewWest|Matthew West]]
  
[11:06] KingsleyIdehen: http://kidehen.blogspot.com/2014/02/class-equivalence-based-reasoning.html  
+
[11:06] [[KingsleyIdehen|Kingsley Idehen]]: http://kidehen.blogspot.com/2014/02/class-equivalence-based-reasoning.html  
  
[11:07] TerryLongstreth: @KingsleyIdehen thesis reminds me of a Turing award lecture by Ken Iverson  
+
[11:07] [[TerryLongstreth|Terry Longstreth]]: @KingsleyIdehen thesis reminds me of a Turing award lecture by Ken Iverson  
  
 
:"Notation as a tool of thought", where he argued that the result of a mental process is invfluenced  
 
:"Notation as a tool of thought", where he argued that the result of a mental process is invfluenced  
Line 613: Line 613:
 
buzzword was 'design language' which was distinct from but mappable to an implementation method.  
 
buzzword was 'design language' which was distinct from but mappable to an implementation method.  
  
[11:15] AndreaWesterinen: @TerryLongstreth [11:07] This also is covered in Gerald Weinberg's  
+
[11:15] [[AndreaWesterinen|Andrea Westerinen]]: @TerryLongstreth [11:07] This also is covered in Gerald Weinberg's  
  
 
Introduction to General Systems Thinking" - in his Laws of Difference and Indifference.  
 
Introduction to General Systems Thinking" - in his Laws of Difference and Indifference.  
  
[11:09] MikeBennett: @TerryLongstreth that sounds like the Saphir-Whorff hypothesis in spoken  
+
[11:09] [[MikeBennett|Mike Bennett]]: @TerryLongstreth that sounds like the Saphir-Whorff hypothesis in spoken  
  
 
language.  
 
language.  
  
[11:20] TerryLongstreth: @MikeBennett - you're probably right, but I think what Iverson was really  
+
[11:20] [[TerryLongstreth|Terry Longstreth]]: @MikeBennett - you're probably right, but I think what Iverson was really  
  
 
talking about was how he used APL as a logical notation beyond programming.  
 
talking about was how he used APL as a logical notation beyond programming.  
  
[11:14] AmandaVizedom: @KingsleyIdehen - slides 12-13 are a great example of how some reasoning *is*  
+
[11:14] [[AmandaVizedom|Amanda Vizedom]]: @KingsleyIdehen - slides 12-13 are a great example of how some reasoning *is*  
  
 
a key part of making Linked Data effective. Granted, subsumption reasoning is the least disputed,  
 
a key part of making Linked Data effective. Granted, subsumption reasoning is the least disputed,  
Line 633: Line 633:
 
ontology/vocabulary mapping greatly amplify the power of linked data.  
 
ontology/vocabulary mapping greatly amplify the power of linked data.  
  
[11:17] AndreaWesterinen: @KingsleyIdehen, slide 17 - separating the rules from the concepts, and  
+
[11:17] [[AndreaWesterinen|Andrea Westerinen]]: @KingsleyIdehen, slide 17 - separating the rules from the concepts, and  
  
 
allowing individual reuse of both, is one of the "summary" points from the Track A emails. Thanks!  
 
allowing individual reuse of both, is one of the "summary" points from the Track A emails. Thanks!  
  
[11:18] KingsleyIdehen: @SimonSpero: no [11:19] KingsleyIdehen: @SimonSpero: it has to be   
+
[11:18] [[KingsleyIdehen|Kingsley Idehen]]: @SimonSpero: no [11:19] [[KingsleyIdehen|Kingsley Idehen]]: @SimonSpero: it has to be   
  
 
<nowiki>:ClassX owl:equivalentClass :ClassY</nowiki> as the basis for such inference  
 
<nowiki>:ClassX owl:equivalentClass :ClassY</nowiki> as the basis for such inference  
  
[11:18] PeterYim: @KingsleyIdehen, great talk ... btw, I think the url's on your (pdf version) slide  
+
[11:18] [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]]: @KingsleyIdehen, great talk ... btw, I think the url's on your (pdf version) slide  
  
 
deck are not active ... can you supply an updated version, so I can swap in, please  
 
deck are not active ... can you supply an updated version, so I can swap in, please  
Line 647: Line 647:
 
... [slides updated; links are active now =ppy/2014.03.07-10:53 PST]  
 
... [slides updated; links are active now =ppy/2014.03.07-10:53 PST]  
  
[11:19] KingsleyIdehen: http://kidehen.blogspot.com/2014/02/class-equivalence-based-reasoning.html  
+
[11:19] [[KingsleyIdehen|Kingsley Idehen]]: http://kidehen.blogspot.com/2014/02/class-equivalence-based-reasoning.html  
  
 
... all links are accessible from this page  
 
... all links are accessible from this page  
  
[11:21] KingsleyIdehen: [1] http://lod.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fxmlns.com%2Ffoaf%2F0.1%2FOrganization&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fdata.reegle.info%2F&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.openlinksw.com%2Fdata%2Fturtle%2Fontology_mappings%2Fschemas_mappings%2FSchemaOrgToOpenLink.ttl
+
[11:21] [[KingsleyIdehen|Kingsley Idehen]]: [1] http://lod.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fxmlns.com%2Ffoaf%2F0.1%2FOrganization&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fdata.reegle.info%2F&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.openlinksw.com%2Fdata%2Fturtle%2Fontology_mappings%2Fschemas_mappings%2FSchemaOrgToOpenLink.ttl
  
 
-- foaf:Organization description  
 
-- foaf:Organization description  
  
[11:22] KingsleyIdehen: [2] http://lod.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fschema.org%2FOrganization&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fdata.reegle.info%2F&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.openlinksw.com%2Fdata%2Fturtle%2Fontology_mappings%2Fschemas_mappings%2FSchemaOrgToOpenLink.ttl  
+
[11:22] [[KingsleyIdehen|Kingsley Idehen]]: [2] http://lod.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fschema.org%2FOrganization&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fdata.reegle.info%2F&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.openlinksw.com%2Fdata%2Fturtle%2Fontology_mappings%2Fschemas_mappings%2FSchemaOrgToOpenLink.ttl  
  
 
-- schemaorg:Organization  
 
-- schemaorg:Organization  
  
[11:18] SimonSpero: @KingsleyIdehen does ":a owl:sameAs foaf:Organization" (virtuso: entail) :a owl:equivalentClass foaf:Organization"  
+
[11:18] [[SimonSpero|Simon Spero]]: @KingsleyIdehen does ":a owl:sameAs foaf:Organization" (virtuso: entail) :a owl:equivalentClass foaf:Organization"  
  
[11:20] KingsleyIdehen: [1] description of foaf:Organization *without inference and reasoning enabled*,  
+
[11:20] [[KingsleyIdehen|Kingsley Idehen]]: [1] description of foaf:Organization *without inference and reasoning enabled*,  
  
 
so the relations presented are specific to the aforementioned class.  
 
so the relations presented are specific to the aforementioned class.  
  
[11:21] KingsleyIdehen: [2] description of schema.org:Organization *without inference and reasoning enabled*,  
+
[11:21] [[KingsleyIdehen|Kingsley Idehen]]: [2] description of schema.org:Organization *without inference and reasoning enabled*,  
  
 
so the relations presented are specific to the aforementioned class .  
 
so the relations presented are specific to the aforementioned class .  
  
[11:21] SimonSpero: @KingsleyIdehen: thanks - it's OWL-Full licensed but not OWL-DL  
+
[11:21] [[SimonSpero|Simon Spero]]: @KingsleyIdehen: thanks - it's OWL-Full licensed but not OWL-DL  
  
[11:18] MichelDumontier: ... unavailable for talking at the moment. please post questions.  
+
[11:18] [[MichelDumontier|Michel Dumontier]]: ... unavailable for talking at the moment. please post questions.  
  
[11:20] AlexShkotin: ... It's too late in Moscow:-) Bye, All.  
+
[11:20] [[AlexShkotin|Alex Shkotin]]: ... It's too late in Moscow:-) Bye, All.  
  
[11:20] MichelDumontier: ... back.  
+
[11:20] [[MichelDumontier|Michel Dumontier]]: ... back.  
  
[11:20] PeterYim: == Q & A and Open Discussion ...  
+
[11:20] [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]]: == Q & A and Open Discussion ...  
  
[11:23] CoryCasanave: Perhaps the speakers could address context and what statements are valid in  
+
[11:23] [[CoryCasanave|Cory Casanave]]: Perhaps the speakers could address context and what statements are valid in  
  
 
what situations. Also, for RDF, how do we encode context.  
 
what situations. Also, for RDF, how do we encode context.  
  
[11:23] KingsleyIdehen: Here are the links with the effect of inference rules:  
+
[11:23] [[KingsleyIdehen|Kingsley Idehen]]: Here are the links with the effect of inference rules:  
  
[11:23] KingsleyIdehen: http://lod.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fschema.org%2FOrganization&inf=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.openlinksw.com%2Fschemas%2Frdfs&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fdata.reegle.info%2F&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.openlinksw.com%2Fdata%2Fturtle%2Fontology_mappings%2Fschemas_mappings%2FSchemaOrgToOpenLink.ttl  
+
[11:23] [[KingsleyIdehen|Kingsley Idehen]]: http://lod.openlinksw.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fschema.org%2FOrganization&inf=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.openlinksw.com%2Fschemas%2Frdfs&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fdata.reegle.info%2F&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.openlinksw.com%2Fdata%2Fturtle%2Fontology_mappings%2Fschemas_mappings%2FSchemaOrgToOpenLink.ttl  
  
 
-- schemaorg:Organization (with instances of foaf:Organization) displayed in the query solution  
 
-- schemaorg:Organization (with instances of foaf:Organization) displayed in the query solution  
  
[11:24] KingsleyIdehen: http://lod.openlinksw.com/describe/?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fpurl.org%2Fgoodrelations%2Fv1%23Offering&inf=urn%3Aschema%3Aopenlink%3Agr%3Amapping%3Arules&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foodnetworkstore.com%2F&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fpurl.org%2Fgoodrelations%2Fv1.owl  
+
[11:24] [[KingsleyIdehen|Kingsley Idehen]]: http://lod.openlinksw.com/describe/?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fpurl.org%2Fgoodrelations%2Fv1%23Offering&inf=urn%3Aschema%3Aopenlink%3Agr%3Amapping%3Arules&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foodnetworkstore.com%2F&graph=http%3A%2F%2Fpurl.org%2Fgoodrelations%2Fv1.owl  
  
 
-- schemaorg:Offers description with instances of goodrelations:Offers (since inference rules are enabled)  
 
-- schemaorg:Offers description with instances of goodrelations:Offers (since inference rules are enabled)  
  
[11:26] KingsleyIdehen: [re. AmandaVizedom's verbal question] I don't mind answering this question  
+
[11:26] [[KingsleyIdehen|Kingsley Idehen]]: [re. AmandaVizedom's verbal question] I don't mind answering this question  
  
[11:33] MikeBennett: The problem with Facebook "Like" is that it doesn't really mean "Like" (re  
+
[11:33] [[MikeBennett|Mike Bennett]]: The problem with Facebook "Like" is that it doesn't really mean "Like" (re  
  
 
Kingsley's description of FB Like in LOD)  
 
Kingsley's description of FB Like in LOD)  
  
[11:34] SimonSpero: http://attempto.ifi.uzh.ch/acewiki/  
+
[11:34] [[SimonSpero|Simon Spero]]: http://attempto.ifi.uzh.ch/acewiki/  
  
[11:35] SimonSpero: [a data wiki type tool]  
+
[11:35] [[SimonSpero|Simon Spero]]: [a data wiki type tool]  
  
[11:35] TerryLongstreth: I think Facebook's ubiquity has meant the new meaning of Like is now  
+
[11:35] [[TerryLongstreth|Terry Longstreth]]: I think Facebook's ubiquity has meant the new meaning of Like is now  
  
 
authoritative, particularly for non-English speakers  
 
authoritative, particularly for non-English speakers  
  
[11:35] SimonSpero: [in ref to @KingsleyIdehen's points]  
+
[11:35] [[SimonSpero|Simon Spero]]: [in ref to @KingsleyIdehen's points]  
  
[11:35] KingsleyIdehen: Tooling  
+
[11:35] [[KingsleyIdehen|Kingsley Idehen]]: Tooling  
  
[11:33] MikeBennett: ... @Peter are we Ok to continue another 5 mins?  
+
[11:33] [[MikeBennett|Mike Bennett]]: ... @Peter are we Ok to continue another 5 mins?  
  
[11:35] PeterYim: ... @MikeBennett, sure, by all mean (we started about 10 min. late)  
+
[11:35] [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]]: ... @MikeBennett, sure, by all mean (we started about 10 min. late)  
  
[11:37] MikeBennett: ... Thanks @Peter. We'll aim to wrap up at nn:40  
+
[11:37] [[MikeBennett|Mike Bennett]]: ... Thanks @Peter. We'll aim to wrap up at nn:40  
  
[11:37] PeterYim: ... great, Mike!  
+
[11:37] [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]]: ... great, Mike!  
  
[11:38] ... anonymous morphed into SundayOjo  
+
[11:38] ... anonymous morphed into [[SundayOjo|Sunday Ojo]]
  
[11:39] AmandaVizedom: +1 for have a context in which, "when we want to make some information  
+
[11:39] [[AmandaVizedom|Amanda Vizedom]]: +1 for have a context in which, "when we want to make some information  
  
 
contribution, we can see what the impact of that would be" (--@MichelDumontier) and to having  
 
contribution, we can see what the impact of that would be" (--@MichelDumontier) and to having  
Line 727: Line 727:
 
something like the Linked Data Wiki that @KingsleyIdehen described, so we can see what exists and  
 
something like the Linked Data Wiki that @KingsleyIdehen described, so we can see what exists and  
  
how things are connected, at a granular (not whole ontology) level. [11:39] KingsleyIdehen: The  
+
how things are connected, at a granular (not whole ontology) level. [11:39] [[KingsleyIdehen|Kingsley Idehen]]: The  
  
 
:likes relation describe via OpenCyc, but part of the LOD cloud: http://bit.ly/YgLgtk  
 
:likes relation describe via OpenCyc, but part of the LOD cloud: http://bit.ly/YgLgtk  
  
[11:39] SimonSpero: Data citation support is an important need for research scientists  
+
[11:39] [[SimonSpero|Simon Spero]]: Data citation support is an important need for research scientists  
  
[11:40] SimonSpero: so they can get tenure XP  
+
[11:40] [[SimonSpero|Simon Spero]]: so they can get tenure XP  
  
[11:40] MichelDumontier: Force11 - http://www.force11.org/datacitation  
+
[11:40] [[MichelDumontier|Michel Dumontier]]: Force11 - http://www.force11.org/datacitation  
  
[11:49] SimonSpero: @MichelDumontier force11 efforts were the ones I was thinking of; the details  
+
[11:49] [[SimonSpero|Simon Spero]]: @MichelDumontier force11 efforts were the ones I was thinking of; the details  
  
 
are a work in progress, but they are making progress  
 
are a work in progress, but they are making progress  
  
[11:40] KingsleyIdehen: http://lod.openlinksw.com/c/G34LSH7 -- OpenCyc Likes & Dislikes  
+
[11:40] [[KingsleyIdehen|Kingsley Idehen]]: http://lod.openlinksw.com/c/G34LSH7 -- OpenCyc Likes & Dislikes  
  
[11:41] MikeBennett: Facebook "Like" means "I wish to follow this conversation" and has no  
+
[11:41] [[MikeBennett|Mike Bennett]]: Facebook "Like" means "I wish to follow this conversation" and has no  
  
 
commonality with sentiment  
 
commonality with sentiment  
  
[11:42] PeterYim: @ALL: if you are not subscribed to the [ontology-summit] mailing list yet, please  
+
[11:42] [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]]: @ALL: if you are not subscribed to the [ontology-summit] mailing list yet, please  
  
 
do so (and participate in the ongoing asynchronous discourse) -  
 
do so (and participate in the ongoing asynchronous discourse) -  
Line 753: Line 753:
 
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit (or drop me a line - peter.yim [at] cim3.com)  
 
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit (or drop me a line - peter.yim [at] cim3.com)  
  
[11:43] PeterYim: @ALL: as announced by our Symposium co-chairs, Professor TimFinin and Dr. Ram  
+
[11:43] [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]]: @ALL: as announced by our Symposium co-chairs, Professor [[TimFinin|Tim Finin]] and Dr. Ram  
  
 
Sriram yesterday, our Apr 28~29 Symposium (at NSF in Greater Washington DC) is now open for  
 
Sriram yesterday, our Apr 28~29 Symposium (at NSF in Greater Washington DC) is now open for  
Line 761: Line 761:
 
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2014/WorkshopRegistration  
 
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2014/WorkshopRegistration  
  
[11:44] PeterYim: @ALL: Please mark you calendars and reserve this time, every Thursday, for the  
+
[11:44] [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]]: @ALL: Please mark you calendars and reserve this time, every Thursday, for the  
  
OntologySummit2014 virtual panel session series. In particular ... Session-09 will be up next  
+
[[OntologySummit2014|Ontology Summit 2014]] virtual panel session series. In particular ... Session-09 will be up next  
  
Thursday - Thu 2014.03.13 - OntologySummit2014: "Track B: Making use of Ontologies: Tools, Services,  
+
Thursday - Thu 2014.03.13 - [[OntologySummit2014|Ontology Summit 2014]]: "Track B: Making use of Ontologies: Tools, Services,  
  
 
and Techniques - II" *** Please pay special attention to the start-time (9:30am PDT), as this week  
 
and Techniques - II" *** Please pay special attention to the start-time (9:30am PDT), as this week  
Line 777: Line 777:
 
time-zones will be clearly posted there  
 
time-zones will be clearly posted there  
  
[11:44] PeterYim: @org-comm members, Reminder to those in the organizing committee, our 8th meeting  
+
[11:44] [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]]: @org-comm members, Reminder to those in the organizing committee, our 8th meeting  
  
 
coming up tomorrow - Fri 2014.03.07 - see:  
 
coming up tomorrow - Fri 2014.03.07 - see:  
Line 783: Line 783:
 
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2014/GettingOrganized#nid47MT  
 
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2014/GettingOrganized#nid47MT  
  
[11:44] PeterYim: Great session ... thank you ALL!  
+
[11:44] [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]]: Great session ... thank you ALL!  
  
[11:44] MichelDumontier: Thanks!  
+
[11:44] [[MichelDumontier|Michel Dumontier]]: Thanks!  
  
[11:45] KingsleyIdehen: Bye  
+
[11:45] [[KingsleyIdehen|Kingsley Idehen]]: Bye  
  
 
[11:45] Gary Berg-Cross: Thanks all  
 
[11:45] Gary Berg-Cross: Thanks all  
  
[11:45] MarcelaVegetti: Bye  
+
[11:45] [[MarcelaVegetti|Marcela Vegetti]]: Bye  
  
[11:45] AndreaWesterinen: Great talks! Thanks!  
+
[11:45] [[AndreaWesterinen|Andrea Westerinen]]: Great talks! Thanks!  
  
[11:46] MikeBennett: Great insights across the whole spectrum of ontology re-use there, I look  
+
[11:46] [[MikeBennett|Mike Bennett]]: Great insights across the whole spectrum of ontology re-use there, I look  
  
 
forward to getting this synthesized into our Track A synthesis, and please continue to chip in via  
 
forward to getting this synthesized into our Track A synthesis, and please continue to chip in via  
Line 801: Line 801:
 
the email and the track community input page.  
 
the email and the track community input page.  
  
[11:45] PeterYim: -- session ended: 11:42 am PST --  
+
[11:45] [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]]: -- session ended: 11:42 am PST --  
  
 
-- end of in-session chat-transcript --  
 
-- end of in-session chat-transcript --  
Line 818: Line 818:
 
* [ontology-summit] discussion archives - http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/  
 
* [ontology-summit] discussion archives - http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/  
 
** to subscribe to this discussion list: send a blank message from your subscribing email address to <ontology-summit-join@ontolog.cim3.net> or visit http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/ and subscribe yourself there  
 
** to subscribe to this discussion list: send a blank message from your subscribing email address to <ontology-summit-join@ontolog.cim3.net> or visit http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/ and subscribe yourself there  
* [http://www.zotero.org/groups/ontologysummit2014 OntologySummit2014 Ontology Summit Community Library] (hosted on Zotero.org) - http://www.zotero.org/groups/ontologysummit2014  
+
* [http://www.zotero.org/groups/ontologysummit2014 [[OntologySummit2014|Ontology Summit 2014]] Ontology Summit Community Library] (hosted on Zotero.org) - http://www.zotero.org/groups/ontologysummit2014  
* [http://www.ontohub.org/repositories/ontology-summit-2014 OntologySummit2014 Ontology Repository] (hosted on OntoHub) -http://www.ontohub.org/repositories/ontology-summit-2014  
+
* [http://www.ontohub.org/repositories/ontology-summit-2014 [[OntologySummit2014|Ontology Summit 2014]] Ontology Repository] (hosted on OntoHub) -http://www.ontohub.org/repositories/ontology-summit-2014  
 
* Homepage of the Ontology Summits - see: '''OntologySummit'''  
 
* Homepage of the Ontology Summits - see: '''OntologySummit'''  
  
Line 879: Line 879:
  
 
* Attended:  
 
* Attended:  
** MikeBennett (co-chair)  
+
** [[MikeBennett|Mike Bennett]] (co-chair)  
 
** [[GaryBergCross]] (co-chair)  
 
** [[GaryBergCross]] (co-chair)  
** AndreaWesterinen (co-chair)  
+
** [[AndreaWesterinen|Andrea Westerinen]] (co-chair)  
** JohnSowa  
+
** [[JohnSowa|John F. Sowa]]
** MichelDumontier  
+
** [[MichelDumontier|Michel Dumontier]]
** KingsleyIdehen  
+
** [[KingsleyIdehen|Kingsley Idehen]]
 
** [[MichaelGruninger|Michael Gr&uuml;ninger]]  
 
** [[MichaelGruninger|Michael Gr&uuml;ninger]]  
** LeoObrst  
+
** [[LeoObrst|Leo Obrst]]
 
** [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]]  
 
** [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]]  
** MikeDean  
+
** [[MikeDean|Mike Dean]]
** GailHodge  
+
** [[GailHodge|Gail Hodge]]
** CarmenChui  
+
** [[CarmenChui|Carmen Chui]]
** MarkLinehan  
+
** [[MarkLinehan|Mark Linehan]]
** NaicongLi  
+
** [[NaicongLi|Naicong Li]]
** FranLightsom  
+
** [[FranLightsom|Fran Lightsom]]
 
** [[PatrickOBrien]]  
 
** [[PatrickOBrien]]  
** SundayOjo  
+
** [[SundayOjo|Sunday Ojo]]
** MatthewWest  
+
** [[MatthewWest|Matthew West]]
** EdBernot  
+
** [[EdBernot|Ed Bernot]]
** AlexShkotin  
+
** [[AlexShkotin|Alex Shkotin]]
 
** [[User:KennethBaclawski|Ken Baclawski]]  
 
** [[User:KennethBaclawski|Ken Baclawski]]  
** MarcelaVegetti  
+
** [[MarcelaVegetti|Marcela Vegetti]]
** BartGajderowicz  
+
** [[BartGajderowicz|Bart Gajderowicz]]
** PavithraKenjige  
+
** [[PavithraKenjige|Pavithra Kenjige]]
** HaroldSolbrig  
+
** [[HaroldSolbrig|Harold Solbrig]]
** NancyWiegand  
+
** [[NancyWiegand|Nancy Wiegand]]
** AlanRector  
+
** [[AlanRector|Alan Rector]]
** AliHashemi  
+
** [[AliHashemi|Ali Hashemi]]
** AmandaVizedom  
+
** [[AmandaVizedom|Amanda Vizedom]]
** AnneThessen  
+
** [[AnneThessen|Anne Thessen]]
** BiplabSarker  
+
** [[BiplabSarker|Biplab Sarker]]
** BobbinTeegarden  
+
** [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]]
** BruceBray  
+
** [[BruceBray|Bruce Bray]]
** ChristiKapp  
+
** [[ChristiKapp|Christi Kapp]]
** ConradBeaulieu  
+
** [[ConradBeaulieu|Conrad Beaulieu]]
** CoryCasanave  
+
** [[CoryCasanave|Cory Casanave]]
** DaliaVaranka  
+
** [[DaliaVaranka|Dalia Varanka]]
** DennisWisnosky  
+
** [[DennisWisnosky|Dennis Wisnosky]]
** DennisPierson  
+
** [[DennisPierson|Dennis Pierson]]
** FrankOlken  
+
** [[FrankOlken|Frank Olken]]
** HensonGraves  
+
** [[HensonGraves|Henson Graves]]
** JackRing  
+
** [[JackRing|Jack Ring]]
** JamesOverton  
+
** [[JamesOverton|James Overton]]
** KrzysztofJanowicz  
+
** [[KrzysztofJanowicz|Krzysztof Janowicz]]
** LesMorgan  
+
** [[LesMorgan|Les Morgan]]
** MatthewLange  
+
** [[MatthewLange|Matthew Lange]]
 
** [[RichardMcAllister]]  
 
** [[RichardMcAllister]]  
** RobertPowers  
+
** [[RobertPowers|Robert Powers]]
** ShahanKhatchadourian  
+
** [[ShahanKhatchadourian|Shahan Khatchadourian]]
** SimonSpero  
+
** [[SimonSpero|Simon Spero]]
** TerryLongstreth  
+
** [[TerryLongstreth|Terry Longstreth]]
** ToddSchneider  
+
** [[ToddSchneider|Todd Schneider]]
** TorstenHahmann  
+
** [[User:TorstenHahmann|Torsten Hahmann]]
** UriShani  
+
** [[UriShani|Uri Shani]]
 
** WernerKuhn  
 
** WernerKuhn  
 
** ...  
 
** ...  
Line 938: Line 938:
 
* Expecting:  
 
* Expecting:  
 
** ...  
 
** ...  
** ''(please add yourself to the list if you are a member of the [[WikiHomePage|Ontolog]] or OntologySummit community, or, rsvp to <peter.yim@cim3.com>)''  
+
** ''(please add yourself to the list if you are a member of the [[WikiHomePage|Ontolog]] or [[OntologySummit|Ontology Summit]] community, or, rsvp to <peter.yim@cim3.com>)''  
  
 
* Regrets:  
 
* Regrets:  
** ChristopherSpottiswoode  
+
** [[ChristopherSpottiswoode|Christopher Spottiswoode]]
** ChristophLange  
+
** [[ChristophLange|Christoph Lange]]
 
** ...  
 
** ...  
  

Latest revision as of 01:47, 9 January 2016

[ ]

Contents

[edit] Ontology Summit 2014 session-08 Track-A: Common Reusable Semantic Content-II - Thu 2014-03-06     (1)

  • Summit Theme: OntologySummit2014: "Big Data and Semantic Web Meet Applied Ontology"     (1A)
  • Track-A Focus: Common Reusable Semantic Content     (1B)
  • Session Topic: Experiences in Knowledge Sharing: Lessons from research and experience in Big Data, Linked Data and Semantic Web Applications     (1C)

Panelists / Briefings:     (1E)

  • Dr. JohnSowa (VivoMind Intelligence) - "Historical Perspectives: On Problems of Knowledge Sharing" ... slides     (1F)
  • Professor MichelDumontier (Stanford BMIR) - "Tactical Formalization of Linked Open Data" ... slides     (1G)
  • Mr. KingsleyIdehen (OpenLink Software) - "Ontology Driven Data Integration & Big Linked Open Data" ... slides     (1H)

[edit] Abstract     (1J)

Experiences in Knowledge Sharing: Lessons from research and experience in Big Data, Linked Data and Semantic Web Applications ... intro slides     (1J1)

This is our 9th Ontology Summit, a joint initiative by Ontolog, NIST, NCOR, NCBO, IAOA & NCO_NITRD with the support of our co-sponsors.     (1J2)

Since the beginnings of the Semantic Web, ontologies have played key roles in the design and deployment of new semantic technologies. Yet over the years, the level of collaboration between the Semantic Web and Applied Ontology communities has been much less than expected. Within Big Data applications, ontologies appear to have had little impact.     (1J3)

This year's Ontology Summit is an opportunity for building bridges between the Semantic Web, Linked Data, Big Data, and Applied Ontology communities. On the one hand, the Semantic Web, Linked Data, and Big Data communities can bring a wide array of real problems (such as performance and scalability challenges and the variety problem in Big Data) and technologies (automated reasoning tools) that can make use of ontologies. On the other hand, the Applied Ontology community can bring a large body of common reusable content (ontologies) and ontological analysis techniques. Identifying and overcoming ontology engineering bottlenecks is critical for all communities.     (1J4)

Ontology Summit 2014 will pose and address the primary challenges in these areas of interaction among the different communities. The Summit activities will bring together insights and methods from these different communities, synthesize new insights, and disseminate knowledge across field boundaries.     (1J5)

In this session we aim to bring together the lessons learned to date and new insights on the re-use of ontology content. We have three speakers lined up to share their perspectives on ontology re-use in the contexts of knowledge representation and sharing, linked data and semantic web reasoning applications. These presentations will be followed by an open discussion on the considerations and requirements for those wanting to identify and use semantic resources in each of these contexts, and the things to think about when developing ontologies for re-usability.     (1J6)

See more details at: OntologySummit2014 (homepage for this summit)     (1J7)

[edit] Briefings     (1J8)

  • Dr. John F. Sowa (VivoMind Intelligence) - "Historical Perspectives: On Problems of Knowledge Sharing" ... slides     (1J8A)
    • Abstract: Documents and libraries written and read by humans have been highly successful for the past three millennia. But differences in languages have been a major obstacle for knowledge sharing among humans. Computer systems are much faster than humans, but much less flexible, tolerant, and knowledgeable. This talk will investigate how we can simplify and enhance knowledge sharing among computers and humans.     (1J8A1)
  • Professor MichelDumontier (Stanford BMIR) - "Tactical Formalization of Linked Open Data" ... slides     (1J8B)
    • Abstract: I will discuss the current challenge of working with "schema-lite" LOD, various strategies to make sense of this data (mappings/community standards), and how we formalize specific parts (in OWL) so they are fit for purpose (deductive reasoning in conjunction with data mining).     (1J8B1)
  • Mr. KingsleyIdehen (OpenLink Software) - "Ontology Driven Data Integration & Big Linked Open Data" ... slides     (1J8C)
    • Abstract: I will discuss how ontologies are being used to address heterogeneous data virtualization. In particular, we will cover: how data across heterogeneous data sources is reconciled using entity relations described in shared ontologies, i.e., what you increasingly find on the Linked Open Data (LOD) and Linked Open Vocabulary (LOV) clouds.     (1J8C1)

OntologySummit2014 session-08 Track-A: Common Reusable Semantic Content-II     (1K1)

Session Format: this is a virtual session conducted over an augmented conference call     (1K2)

[edit] Proceedings     (1L)

Please refer to the above     (1L1)

[edit] IM Chat Transcript captured during the session    (1L2)

see raw transcript here.     (1L2A)

(for better clarity, the version below is a re-organized and lightly edited chat-transcript.)     (1L2B)

Participants are welcome to make light edits to their own contributions as they see fit.     (1L2C)

-- begin in-session chat-transcript --     (1L2D)


Chat transcript from room: summit_20140306     (1L2E)

2014-03-06 GMT-08:00 [PST]     (1L2F)


[8:53] Peter P. Yim: Welcome to the     (1L2G)

Ontology Summit 2014 session-08 Track-A: Common Reusable Semantic Content-II - Thu 2014-03-06     (1L2H)

Summit Theme: Summit Theme: Ontology Summit 2014: "Big Data and Semantic Web Meet Applied Ontology"     (1L2I)

Track-A Focus: Common Reusable Semantic Content     (1L2J)

Session Topic: Experiences in Knowledge Sharing: Lessons from research and experience in Big Data, Linked Data and Semantic Web Applications     (1L2K)

Session Co-chairs:     (1L2L)

Logistics:     (1L2T)

  • (if you haven't already done so) please click on "settings" (top center) and morph from "anonymous" to your RealName; also please enable "Show timestamps" while there.     (1L2V)
  • Mute control (phone keypad): *7 to un-mute ... *6 to mute     (1L2W)

(i.e. even if it says it is "offline," you should still be able to connect to it.)     (1L2Z)

VoIP line, etc.) either your phone, skype-out or google-voice and call the US dial-in number: +1 (206) 402-0100     (1L2AB)

... when prompted enter Conference ID: 141184#     (1L2AC)

  • when posting in this Chat-room, kindly observe the following ...     (1L2AG)
    • whenever a name is used, please use the full WikiWord name format (every time you don't, some volunteer will have to make an edit afterwards)     (1L2AH1)
    • always provide context (like: "[ref. JaneDoe's slide#12], I think the point about context is great" ... rather than "that's great!"     (1L2AI1)

as the latter would mean very little in the archives.)     (1L2AJ)

the timestamp (in PST) of his/her post that you are responding to (e.g. "@JaneDoe [11:09] - I agree, but, ...")     (1L2AL)

    • use fully qualified url's (include http:// ) without symbols (like punctuations or parentheses, etc.) right before of after that URL     (1L2AM1)

Proceedings     (1L2AV)

[9:19] anonymous morphed into Conrad Beaulieu     (1L2AX)

[9:26] anonymous morphed into Terry Longstreth     (1L2AY)

[9:17] Kingsley Idehen: Just checking the settings     (1L2AZ)

[9:26] Peter P. Yim: Hi Kingsley ... hi, everyone!     (1L2AAA)

[9:26] Mike Bennett: Hi Peter!     (1L2AAB)

[9:27] Ed Bernot: Hi Peter!     (1L2AAC)

[9:28] anonymous morphed into Michel     (1L2AAD)

[9:29] anonymous morphed into Robert Powers     (1L2AAE)

[9:30] Alex Shkotin: What about Skype?     (1L2AAG)

[9:30] Mike Bennett: Hi Alex. Skype joinconference seems to work OK here.     (1L2AAH)

[9:31] anonymous morphed into Naicong Li     (1L2AAJ)

[9:32] anonymous morphed into Andrea Westerinen     (1L2AAK)

[9:34] anonymous morphed into Carmen Chui     (1L2AAL)

[9:34] Robert Powers morphed into Robert Powers     (1L2AAM)

[9:34] GaryBergCross: Michel is on the chat.     (1L2AAO)

[9:36] Robert Powers: Michel, are you on the call?     (1L2AAP)

[9:36] Mike Bennett: Is the Michel on the chat MichelDumontier? If so please can you change it to     (1L2AAQ)

your full name and join us on the phone bridge if you're not already. Many thanks!     (1L2AAR)

[9:37] Michel: hi, just getting off a call     (1L2AAS)

[9:39] Michel morphed into Michel Dumontier     (1L2AAT)

[9:38] GaryBergCross: I sent John F. Sowa an email to see if he is joining us..     (1L2AAV)

[9:39] Matthew Lange: Is the vnc server up?     (1L2AAW)

[9:40] Mike Bennett: Yes the VNC server is up     (1L2AAX)

[9:40] Michel Dumontier: have joined the call     (1L2AAY)

[9:46] GaryBergCross: No answer from the tele #s I have for JohnSowa...so still puzzled.     (1L2AAZ)

[9:47] Peter P. Yim: John F. Sowa is already on the voice line     (1L2AAAA)

[9:48] GaryBergCross: Ok Good .. didn't see him on chat.     (1L2AAAB)

[9:48] Peter P. Yim: we might want to (verbally) prompt him, as well as others who aren't already here,     (1L2AAAC)

to join us in the chat-room     (1L2AAAD)

[9:52] GaryBergCross: Welcome John....     (1L2AAAE)

[9:41] Peter P. Yim: == Mike Bennett starts the session on behalf of Session Co-chairs ... see slides     (1L2AAAF)

[9:41] ... anonymous morphed into Les Morgan     (1L2AAAH)

[9:43] ... anonymous morphed into Bruce Bray     (1L2AAAI)

[9:43] ... anonymous morphed into RichardMcAllister     (1L2AAAJ)

[9:51] anonymous morphed into Cory Casanave     (1L2AAAK)

[9:52] Matthew West: What counts as "small set of semantic content" and what counts as "large set of     (1L2AAAL)

semantic content" on Slide 6 of the introduction?     (1L2AAAM)

[9:55] Andrea Westerinen: @MatthewWest [9:52] "Small" means a design pattern with a few classes and     (1L2AAAN)

relationships. "Large" could be a complete domain or upper ontology or schema.     (1L2AAAO)

[9:56] Simon Spero: @MatthewWest [9:52] : small == can be visualized on an A0 poster : large = (not small)?     (1L2AAAP)

[9:52] GaryBergCross: Welcome John....     (1L2AAAQ)

[9:56] Peter P. Yim: == John F. Sowa presenting ...     (1L2AAAR)

[9:56] ... anonymous morphed into Bobbin Teegarden     (1L2AAAS)

[10:01] GaryBergCross: Lack of Semantic app software not well integrated with mainstream IT is a     (1L2AAAT)

major problem as shown on slide 5.     (1L2AAAU)

[10:03] Anne Thessen: I completely agree with John F. Sowa slide 6 ["We need better tools, interfaces,     (1L2AAAV)

and methodologies ..."]     (1L2AAAW)

[10:04] GaryBergCross: This is a topic for the Tool track to address.     (1L2AAAX)

[10:03] Mike Bennett: ... slide 8     (1L2AAAY)

[10:04] Mike Bennett: ... slide 9     (1L2AAAZ)

[10:04] Mike Bennett: John please call out the slide numbers     (1L2AAAAA)

[10:05] Peter P. Yim: @MikeBennett ... please try to prompt John F. Sowa verbally     (1L2AAAAB)

[10:09] Peter P. Yim: ... on slide#14 now     (1L2AAAAC)

[10:13] Peter P. Yim: ... on slide#16 now     (1L2AAAAD)

[10:13] Amanda Vizedom: Question for @JohnSowa (we are on slide 11, but q applies to this whole range     (1L2AAAAE)

of slides): In my experience, being familiar with the history of logic & these fundamentals is     (1L2AAAAF)

useful in making ontology design/architecture decisions, in recognizing the logical equivalence (or     (1L2AAAAG)

non-) of different representation approaches, and in recognizing certain ontology anti-patterns that     (1L2AAAAH)

correspond to classic logical errors. However, they are no where near enough to ground reusable     (1L2AAAAI)

ontology development. How do you think that understanding these logical representations and patterns     (1L2AAAAJ)

is helpful to overcoming obstacles to reuse?     (1L2AAAAK)

[10:16] Alex Shkotin: @AmandaVizedom, we should not repeat their errors;-)     (1L2AAAAL)

[10:19] GaryBergCross: @AmandaVizedom Great question for John. I hope we get to it in discussion.     (1L2AAAAM)

[10:14] Peter P. Yim: ... on slide#17 now     (1L2AAAAN)

[10:18] ... anonymous morphed into PatrickOBrien     (1L2AAAAO)

[10:18] Peter P. Yim: ... on slide#19 now     (1L2AAAAP)

[10:18] Ali Hashemi: ... (i believe it's slide 21)     (1L2AAAAQ)

[10:19] Peter P. Yim: ... on slide#22 now     (1L2AAAAR)

[10:20] GaryBergCross: John is getting at problems of reusing some well know resources like WordNet.     (1L2AAAAT)

[10:21] Peter P. Yim: ... on slide#28 now [10:21] GaryBergCross: [ ref. slide#29: "Enable subject-matter     (1L2AAAAU)

experts to review, update, and extend their knowledge bases with little or no assistance from IT     (1L2AAAAV)

specialists" ] Uh oh.. getting rid of the KE means unemployment for some of us...     (1L2AAAAW)

[10:22] Cory Casanave: Many (most?) domain experts have no notation, what is the notation of law enforcement?     (1L2AAAAX)

[10:22] Simon Spero: @CoryCasanave: UCR (Uniform Crime Reporting)     (1L2AAAAY)

[10:23] Simon Spero: @CoryCasanave: 10-codes     (1L2AAAAZ)

[10:24] Cory Casanave: @Simon, they do have domain vocabularies - but most lack ways to express them     (1L2AAAAAA)

other than text and spreadsheets     (1L2AAAAAB)

[10:26] Mike Bennett: @CoryCasanave [10:22] if you walk into any conference room there are whiteboard     (1L2AAAAAC)

diagrams with boxes and lines. So presenting subject matter in edges and lines, with textual     (1L2AAAAAD)

annotation, should be a relatively universal SME format.     (1L2AAAAAE)

[10:30] Cory Casanave: @MikeBennett, some people respond to ad-hoc boxes and lines, some don't. Fewer     (1L2AAAAAF)

respond to boxes and lines with any semantic consistency [10:31] Mike Bennett: @CoryCasanave very     (1L2AAAAAG)

true - in any group there are those whose primary modality is visual, and those whose is verbal.     (1L2AAAAAH)

Need spreadsheets / tables / wiki pages for the latter. THe same content needs to be expressable in     (1L2AAAAAI)

[10:36] John F. Sowa: @MikeBennett, I strongly support spreadsheets. That's another example of a     (1L2AAAAAK)

modality that requires almost zero learning to start using effectively.     (1L2AAAAAL)

[10:38] Mike Bennett: @JohnSowa I've seen some very complex SME spreadsheets - but it's their     (1L2AAAAAM)

complexity not ours. I think there's potential in a spreadsheet structure that reflects classes,     (1L2AAAAAN)

properties (with real-world names on the columns, not OWL terms)     (1L2AAAAAO)

[10:41] John F. Sowa: @MikeBennett (and continuation of note to @DennisWisnosky), then I would derive as     (1L2AAAAAP)

much of the knowledge as possible from available data of any kind -- structured and unstructured.     (1L2AAAAAQ)

The primary role of the SME would be to answer questions to help the automated tools work better.     (1L2AAAAAR)

[10:24] Dennis Wisnosky: Why documents feeding the NL Tools. Why not some SIRI?     (1L2AAAAAS)

[10:30] John F. Sowa: @DennisWisnosky, I mentioned documents because the bulk of the knowledge is in     (1L2AAAAAT)

documents. But I would certainly recommend SIRI or similar voice-based tools as an option --     (1L2AAAAAU)

especially for hands-free use by the SMEs.     (1L2AAAAAV)

[10:24] Amanda Vizedom: About @JohnSowa's slide 20: I would (do, have done) argue that the quest for     (1L2AAAAAW)

a complete ontology has been an significant hindrance to the development of reusable ontologies.     (1L2AAAAAX)

Even if it were a complete ontology, to incorporate all of the contextual variation and dependencies     (1L2AAAAAY)

observed in reality, it would be unusable. It would be at least as unusable as a life-sized map.     (1L2AAAAAZ)

Ontologies, like scientific models, need to be circumscribed in order to be usable. But that doesn't     (1L2AAAAAAA)

mean we can't have reuse. IMHO, it does mean we have to do better at making the boundaries and     (1L2AAAAAAB)

emphasis of our ontologies clear and detectable.     (1L2AAAAAAC)

[10:27] John F. Sowa: @Amanda, short answer: what we can learn from history is the requirement that     (1L2AAAAAAD)

tools must be designed for the SMEs to use without additional training. We still need KEs, but not     (1L2AAAAAAE)

in the middle between the SME and the system. There is much more to say, but that's another topic.     (1L2AAAAAAF)

[10:30] Todd Schneider: @JohnSowa, in your assertion that 'systems have been inter-operating for ...'     (1L2AAAAAAG)

many years leaves out the process to get them to inter-operate. The ability to get information (and     (1L2AAAAAAH)

other) systems to inter-operate in a timely and cost effective manner is still a challenge.     (1L2AAAAAAI)

[10:34] John F. Sowa: @ToddSchneider, I agree. Semantics has helped us develop better systems. But more     (1L2AAAAAAJ)

people would use more and better semantics if the learning curve were less steep.     (1L2AAAAAAK)

[10:40] Todd Schneider: @JohnSowa, I agree. If engineers had more training in logic and ontological     (1L2AAAAAAL)

analysis would help in this regard. However, somethings are difficult to understand (e.g., Saharon     (1L2AAAAAAM)

Shelah's book on Classification Theory, Quantum Field Theory). Of course this puts the onus on us to     (1L2AAAAAAN)

help create tools that aid the general user to better apply the techniques of ontology when creating     (1L2AAAAAAO)

[10:35] Dennis Wisnosky: @JohnSowa - you don't discuss the bias of the SME's and the bias of the     (1L2AAAAAAQ)

Knowledge person to bias the KB = ontology. I believe that just as in other domains - e.g.     (1L2AAAAAAR)

manufacturing the only way truth will will-out is to eliminate the human.     (1L2AAAAAAS)

[10:38] John F. Sowa: Dennis, I didn't even have time to mention all my slides. If by "eliminating the     (1L2AAAAAAT)

human" you mean that as much as possible of the knowledge be derived from available resources (Big     (1L2AAAAAAU)

[10:43] Dennis Wisnosky: @JohnSowa - Yes, just saw your last sting and I agree. In addition, first I     (1L2AAAAAAW)

am buying totally that a NL processor takes the place of the knowledge worker = the ontologist,     (1L2AAAAAAX)

maybe. Secondly, I am saying that over time we can build rules into the NL processor that based upon     (1L2AAAAAAY)

the natural laws that you mentioned, as well as the context, etc. throws away that which does not     (1L2AAAAAAZ)

make sense. This may happen in real time, or analyzing what the data store as it is amassed.     (1L2AAAAAAAA)

[10:46] Andrea Westerinen: @DennisWisnosky [10:43] NL processing really only works if it understands     (1L2AAAAAAAB)

the language of the domain of the SME. This is not generic. At this point in time, getting the     (1L2AAAAAAAC)

domain concepts right could be partially automated but definitely needs cleanup and iteration by     (1L2AAAAAAAD)

[10:47] John F. Sowa: I am not advocating full NL understanding. But current tools can derive enough     (1L2AAAAAAAF)

from documents (or speech) to formulate intelligent questions when they need help.     (1L2AAAAAAAG)

[10:48] Andrea Westerinen: @JohnSowa [10:47] That has not been my experience - unless you have     (1L2AAAAAAAH)

knowledge of the domain and its language.     (1L2AAAAAAAI)

[10:48] John F. Sowa: @AndreaWesterinen For examples of the way systems can learn by reading, see     (1L2AAAAAAAJ)

http://www.jfsowa.com/talks/goal7.pdf [10:45] John F. Sowa: @ToddSchneider and @DennisWisnosky, I     (1L2AAAAAAAK)

believe that highly trained experts already know the best way to talk about their field. They should     (1L2AAAAAAAL)

not have to learn any conventions that we want them to use.     (1L2AAAAAAAM)

[11:08] Todd Schneider: @JohnSowa, "highly trained experts already know the best way to talk about     (1L2AAAAAAAN)

their field", but only within their field. If there's a need to communicate outside their field     (1L2AAAAAAAO)

(i.e. inter-operate), then there's a problem. [11:17] John F. Sowa: @ToddSchneider, I agree that many     (1L2AAAAAAAP)

experts don't communicate effectively with people in other fields. But the problem for anybody,     (1L2AAAAAAAQ)

expert or not, to communicate effectively with computers is many orders of magnitude more difficult.     (1L2AAAAAAAR)

[11:16] GaryBergCross: @JohnSowa would you have an issues with the value of formalizing small     (1L2AAAAAAAS)

schemas the way Michel did for the relation between drug disease pathway and gene?     (1L2AAAAAAAT)

[10:31] Amanda Vizedom: @MichelDumontier, very glad to have presentation that starts from deep     (1L2AAAAAAAV)

awareness of how much is out there (as in LOV) and moves through experiences with trying to reuse     (1L2AAAAAAAW)

it. Thanks for contributing this.     (1L2AAAAAAAX)

[10:50] Michel Dumontier: @AmandaVizedom thanks for your comment :)     (1L2AAAAAAAY)

[10:54] Amanda Vizedom: @MichelDumontier, You're welcome. Many are confronting such tactical issues     (1L2AAAAAAAZ)

now, I think. Folks increasingly start with a plan to reuse, but find it nowhere near as simple as     (1L2AAAAAAAAA)

they expected. Gory details of how people manage reuse successfully are valuable!     (1L2AAAAAAAAB)

[10:42] Amanda Vizedom: Something going unstated here wrt this discussion of tools for KE / ontology     (1L2AAAAAAAAC)

development and the question of reusable content / reuse of content. I'm not saying that they are     (1L2AAAAAAAAD)

unrelated, only that the conversation just above (multiple participants) seems to be taking as     (1L2AAAAAAAAE)

obvious what the connection is. Are any of you willing & able to spell that out?     (1L2AAAAAAAAF)

[10:48] GaryBergCross: @MichelDumontier Very nice perspective on a tactical approach to     (1L2AAAAAAAAG)

formalization for specific reuse.     (1L2AAAAAAAAH)

[10:49] Peter P. Yim: @MichelDumontier - for what you are trying to achieve, does limitations of     (1L2AAAAAAAAJ)

expressivity of the ontology language (OWL in your case) come into the picture     (1L2AAAAAAAAK)

[10:52] Michel Dumontier: @PeterYim so far we have been quite happy with OWL for consistency checking     (1L2AAAAAAAAL)

(OWL-DL profile) and query answering (OWL-EL profile)     (1L2AAAAAAAAM)

[10:54] Michel Dumontier: @PeterYim As we look towards more *accurate* representations of source     (1L2AAAAAAAAN)

knowledge, however, may require something else     (1L2AAAAAAAAO)

[10:55] Peter P. Yim: @MichelDumontier, thanks ... what are the "something else" being considered now?     (1L2AAAAAAAAP)

[10:57] Peter P. Yim: Thank you, @MichelDumontier     (1L2AAAAAAAAQ)

[10:57] Michel Dumontier: @PeterYim probabilistic reasoning (from aggregation and evidence type),     (1L2AAAAAAAAR)

non-monotonic reasoning (for inconsistent kbs)     (1L2AAAAAAAAS)

[10:55] GaryBergCross: @MichelDumontier Is the OntoFunc Tool something that might be easily used by     (1L2AAAAAAAAT)

interested parties for finding relations between object and ontology categories in areas other than     (1L2AAAAAAAAU)

[10:57] Michel Dumontier: @GaryBergCross yes. can be used with any terminology.     (1L2AAAAAAAAW)

[10:56] Robert Powers: @MichelDumontier Could category theory/ologs be an answer to the problem of     (1L2AAAAAAAAY)

representation you show in slide 11?     (1L2AAAAAAAAZ)

[11:01] Michel Dumontier: @RobertPowers two factors - initial RDF was minimal (model 1) because     (1L2AAAAAAAAAA)

triple stores didn't scale, and different datasets do not necessarily collect all the data that     (1L2AAAAAAAAAB)

another similar type dataset does. we need a general model for entity-attribute-value pertaining to     (1L2AAAAAAAAAC)

measurements to define standard representations. e.g.     (1L2AAAAAAAAAD)

[11:04] Robert Powers: @MichelDumontier Yes, thx Michel!     (1L2AAAAAAAAAG)

[11:03] Simon Spero: @MichelDumontier OASIS Quantities and Units of Measure Ontology Standard     (1L2AAAAAAAAAH)

[11:06] Andrea Westerinen: @MichelDumontier There is also Quantities, Units, Dimensions and Data     (1L2AAAAAAAAAJ)

Types Ontologies (QUDT) ... http://www.qudt.org/     (1L2AAAAAAAAAK)

[11:22] Michel Dumontier: @AndreaWesterinen @SimonSpero - indeed there are now many standards! but     (1L2AAAAAAAAAL)

[10:49] Matthew West: ... *7 to unmute     (1L2AAAAAAAAAO)

[10:50] Matthew West: ... @Mike - we could hear you.     (1L2AAAAAAAAAQ)

[10:50] Mike Bennett: ... Thanks @Matthew, I thought I had gone missing for a bit :)     (1L2AAAAAAAAAR)

-- example that includes live examples in regards to my session re. ontology driven integration of     (1L2AAAAAAAAAT)

disparate data, across the burgeoning LInked Open Data (LOD) Cloud. A related presentation, in     (1L2AAAAAAAAAU)

regards to understanding what data actually is: http://slidesha.re/1epEyZ1     (1L2AAAAAAAAAV)

[10:57] Peter P. Yim: ... on slide#7 now     (1L2AAAAAAAAAX)

[11:00] GaryBergCross: @KingsleyIdehen Thanks for framing this practical issue of the dilemma for     (1L2AAAAAAAAAY)

LOD folks finding a starting point.     (1L2AAAAAAAAAZ)

[11:02] GaryBergCross: @KingsleyIdehen Some of us start not with a formal ontology or LOD vocabulary     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAA)

but with a "conceptual model" of the domain under consideration.     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAB)

[11:04] Matthew West: ... Apologies, I have to leave.     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAC)

[11:07] Terry Longstreth: @KingsleyIdehen thesis reminds me of a Turing award lecture by Ken Iverson     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAF)

"Notation as a tool of thought", where he argued that the result of a mental process is invfluenced     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAG)

by the medium and means used. Computer Science also went through a period when the most important     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAH)

buzzword was 'design language' which was distinct from but mappable to an implementation method.     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAI)

[11:15] Andrea Westerinen: @TerryLongstreth [11:07] This also is covered in Gerald Weinberg's     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAJ)

Introduction to General Systems Thinking" - in his Laws of Difference and Indifference.     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAK)

[11:09] Mike Bennett: @TerryLongstreth that sounds like the Saphir-Whorff hypothesis in spoken     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAL)

[11:20] Terry Longstreth: @MikeBennett - you're probably right, but I think what Iverson was really     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAN)

talking about was how he used APL as a logical notation beyond programming.     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAO)

[11:14] Amanda Vizedom: @KingsleyIdehen - slides 12-13 are a great example of how some reasoning *is*     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAP)

a key part of making Linked Data effective. Granted, subsumption reasoning is the least disputed,     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAQ)

but it gives a nice, salient example of how even small increments of reasoning and     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAR)

ontology/vocabulary mapping greatly amplify the power of linked data.     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAS)

[11:17] Andrea Westerinen: @KingsleyIdehen, slide 17 - separating the rules from the concepts, and     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAT)

allowing individual reuse of both, is one of the "summary" points from the Track A emails. Thanks!     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAU)

[11:18] Kingsley Idehen: @SimonSpero: no [11:19] Kingsley Idehen: @SimonSpero: it has to be     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAV)

:ClassX owl:equivalentClass :ClassY as the basis for such inference     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAW)

[11:18] Peter P. Yim: @KingsleyIdehen, great talk ... btw, I think the url's on your (pdf version) slide     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAX)

deck are not active ... can you supply an updated version, so I can swap in, please     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAY)

... [slides updated; links are active now =ppy/2014.03.07-10:53 PST]     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAZ)

... all links are accessible from this page     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAB)

-- foaf:Organization description     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAD)

-- schemaorg:Organization     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAF)

[11:18] Simon Spero: @KingsleyIdehen does ":a owl:sameAs foaf:Organization" (virtuso: entail) :a owl:equivalentClass foaf:Organization"     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAG)

[11:20] Kingsley Idehen: [1] description of foaf:Organization *without inference and reasoning enabled*,     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAH)

so the relations presented are specific to the aforementioned class.     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAI)

[11:21] Kingsley Idehen: [2] description of schema.org:Organization *without inference and reasoning enabled*,     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAJ)

so the relations presented are specific to the aforementioned class .     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAK)

[11:21] Simon Spero: @KingsleyIdehen: thanks - it's OWL-Full licensed but not OWL-DL     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAL)

[11:18] Michel Dumontier: ... unavailable for talking at the moment. please post questions.     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAM)

[11:20] Alex Shkotin: ... It's too late in Moscow:-) Bye, All.     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAN)

[11:20] Peter P. Yim: == Q & A and Open Discussion ...     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAP)

[11:23] Cory Casanave: Perhaps the speakers could address context and what statements are valid in     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAQ)

what situations. Also, for RDF, how do we encode context.     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAR)

[11:23] Kingsley Idehen: Here are the links with the effect of inference rules:     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAS)

-- schemaorg:Organization (with instances of foaf:Organization) displayed in the query solution     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAU)

-- schemaorg:Offers description with instances of goodrelations:Offers (since inference rules are enabled)     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAW)

[11:26] Kingsley Idehen: [re. AmandaVizedom's verbal question] I don't mind answering this question     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAX)

[11:33] Mike Bennett: The problem with Facebook "Like" is that it doesn't really mean "Like" (re     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAY)

Kingsley's description of FB Like in LOD)     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAZ)

[11:35] Simon Spero: [a data wiki type tool]     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAB)

[11:35] Terry Longstreth: I think Facebook's ubiquity has meant the new meaning of Like is now     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAC)

authoritative, particularly for non-English speakers     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAD)

[11:35] Simon Spero: [in ref to @KingsleyIdehen's points]     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAE)

[11:33] Mike Bennett: ... @Peter are we Ok to continue another 5 mins?     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAG)

[11:35] Peter P. Yim: ... @MikeBennett, sure, by all mean (we started about 10 min. late)     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAH)

[11:37] Mike Bennett: ... Thanks @Peter. We'll aim to wrap up at nn:40     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAI)

[11:37] Peter P. Yim: ... great, Mike!     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAJ)

[11:38] ... anonymous morphed into Sunday Ojo     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAK)

[11:39] Amanda Vizedom: +1 for have a context in which, "when we want to make some information     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAL)

contribution, we can see what the impact of that would be" (--@MichelDumontier) and to having     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAM)

something like the Linked Data Wiki that @KingsleyIdehen described, so we can see what exists and     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAN)

how things are connected, at a granular (not whole ontology) level. [11:39] Kingsley Idehen: The     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAO)

likes relation describe via OpenCyc, but part of the LOD cloud: http://bit.ly/YgLgtk     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAP)

[11:39] Simon Spero: Data citation support is an important need for research scientists     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAQ)

[11:40] Simon Spero: so they can get tenure XP     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAR)

[11:49] Simon Spero: @MichelDumontier force11 efforts were the ones I was thinking of; the details     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAT)

are a work in progress, but they are making progress     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAU)

[11:41] Mike Bennett: Facebook "Like" means "I wish to follow this conversation" and has no     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAW)

commonality with sentiment     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAX)

[11:42] Peter P. Yim: @ALL: if you are not subscribed to the [ontology-summit] mailing list yet, please     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAY)

do so (and participate in the ongoing asynchronous discourse) -     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAZ)

[11:43] Peter P. Yim: @ALL: as announced by our Symposium co-chairs, Professor Tim Finin and Dr. Ram     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAAB)

Sriram yesterday, our Apr 28~29 Symposium (at NSF in Greater Washington DC) is now open for     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAAC)

registration. Please register yourself ASAP, as capacity is limited - see:     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAAD)

[11:44] Peter P. Yim: @ALL: Please mark you calendars and reserve this time, every Thursday, for the     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAAF)

Ontology Summit 2014 virtual panel session series. In particular ... Session-09 will be up next     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAAG)

Thursday - Thu 2014.03.13 - Ontology Summit 2014: "Track B: Making use of Ontologies: Tools, Services,     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAAH)

and Techniques - II" *** Please pay special attention to the start-time (9:30am PDT), as this week     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAAI)

is among the tricky ones, when N.America is in Summer time, Europe is still in Winter time, and lots     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAAJ)

of other regions don't do daylight saving time at all! *** - see developing details at:     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAAK)

time-zones will be clearly posted there     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAAM)

[11:44] Peter P. Yim: @org-comm members, Reminder to those in the organizing committee, our 8th meeting     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAAN)

coming up tomorrow - Fri 2014.03.07 - see:     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAAO)

[11:44] Peter P. Yim: Great session ... thank you ALL!     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAAQ)

[11:45] Gary Berg-Cross: Thanks all     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAAT)

[11:45] Andrea Westerinen: Great talks! Thanks!     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAAV)

[11:46] Mike Bennett: Great insights across the whole spectrum of ontology re-use there, I look     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAAW)

forward to getting this synthesized into our Track A synthesis, and please continue to chip in via     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAAX)

the email and the track community input page.     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAAY)

[11:45] Peter P. Yim: -- session ended: 11:42 am PST --     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAAZ)

-- end of in-session chat-transcript --     (1L2AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA)

[edit] Additional Resources     (1M)


For the record ...     (1M6)

[edit] How To Join (while the session is in progress)     (1N)

  • Dial-in:     (1N4D)
    • Phone (US): +1 (206) 402-0100 ... when prompted enter Conference ID: 141184# ... (long distance cost may apply)     (1N4D1)
    • Skype: joinconference (i.e. make a skype call to the contact with skypeID="joinconference") ... (generally free-of-charge, when connecting from your computer ... ref.)     (1N4D2)
      • when prompted enter Conference ID: 141184#     (1N4D2A)
      • Unfamiliar with how to do this on Skype? ...     (1N4D2B)
        • Add the contact "joinconference" to your skype contact list first. To participate in the teleconference, make a skype call to "joinconference", then open the dial pad (see platform-specific instructions below) and enter the Conference ID: 141184# when prompted.     (1N4D2B1)
        • you may connect to (the skypeID) "joinconference" whether or not it indicates that it is online (i.e. even if it says it is "offline," you should still be able to connect to it.)     (1N4D2B2)
      • Can't find Skype Dial pad? ...     (1N4D2C)
        • for Windows Skype users: Can't find Skype Dial pad? ... it's under the "Call" dropdown menu as "Show Dial pad"     (1N4D2C1)
        • for Linux Skype users: please note that the dial-pad is only available on v4.1 (or later; or on the earlier Skype versions 2.x,) if the dialpad button is not shown in the call window you need to press the "d" hotkey to enable it. ... (ref.)     (1N4D2C2)
  • Shared-screen support (VNC session), if applicable, will be started 5 minutes before the call at: http://vnc2.cim3.net:5800/ ... view-only password: "ontolog"     (1N4E)
    • if you plan to be logging into this shared-screen option (which the speaker may be navigating), and you are not familiar with the process, please try to call in 5 minutes before the start of the session so that we can work out the connection logistics. Help on this will generally not be available once the presentation starts.     (1N4E1)
    • people behind corporate firewalls may have difficulty accessing this. If that is the case, please download the slides above (where applicable) and running them locally. The speaker(s) will prompt you to advance the slides during the talk.     (1N4E2)
    • instructions: once you got access to the page, click on the "settings" button, and identify yourself (by modifying the Name field from "anonymous" to your real name, like "JaneDoe").     (1N4F1)
    • You can indicate that you want to ask a question verbally by clicking on the "hand" button, and wait for the moderator to call on you; or, type and send your question into the chat window at the bottom of the screen.     (1N4F2)
    • thanks to the soaphub.org folks, one can now use a jabber/xmpp client (e.g. Digsby or Adium) to join this chatroom. Just add the room as a buddy - (in our case here) summit_20140306@soaphub.org ... Handy for mobile devices!     (1N4F3)
  • Discussions and Q & A:     (1N4G)
    • Nominally, when a presentation is in progress, the moderator will mute everyone, except for the speaker.     (1N4G1)
    • To un-mute, press "*7" ... To mute, press "*6" (please mute your phone, especially if you are in a noisy surrounding, or if you are introducing noise, echoes, etc. into the conference line.)     (1N4G2)
    • we will usually save all questions and discussions till after all presentations are through. You are encouraged to jot down questions onto the chat-area in the mean time (that way, they get documented; and you might even get some answers in the interim, through the chat.)     (1N4G3)
    • During the Q&A / discussion segment (when everyone is muted), If you want to speak or have questions or remarks to make, please raise your hand (virtually) by clicking on the "hand button" (lower right) on the chat session page. You may speak when acknowledged by the session moderator (again, press "*7" on your phone to un-mute). Test your voice and introduce yourself first before proceeding with your remarks, please. (Please remember to click on the "hand button" again (to lower your hand) and press "*6" on your phone to mute yourself after you are done speaking.)     (1N4G4)
  • RSVP to peter.yim@cim3.com with your affiliation, ... or simply just by adding yourself to the "Expected Attendees" list below (if you are already a member of the community.)     (1N4I)
  • Please note that this session may be recorded, and if so, the audio archive is expected to be made available as open content, along with the proceedings of the call to our community membership and the public at-large under our prevailing open IPR policy.     (1N4K)

[edit] Attendees     (1O)


This page has been migrated from the OntologWiki - Click here for original page     (1O4)