UpperOntologySummit/UosApplicationDialogMeeting 2006 03 15

UpperOntologySummit - Application Dialog Meeting, Wednesday, March 15, 2006, 9 AM- 12 NOON EST

• Agenda

Session Details

• Subject: Upper Ontology Application Dialog
• Session Chair: Dr. Dagobert Soergel
• Date: Wednesday, March 15, 2006
• Session: 9:00 am - 12:00 noon EST (3 Hours)
• Location: Building 227, Conference Room (second floor). See map
  • Start Time: 9:00 AM EST / 6:00 AM PST / 14:00 UTC (see world clock for other time zones)
  • USA Toll Free Number: 888-809-8971
  • USA Toll Number: +1-312-470-0177
  • PASSCODE: 12077
  • For security reasons, the passcode and the leader's name (Steve Ray) will be required to join your call.
  • IN-CONFERENCE FEATURES - The following features are available for you to use on your phone during an active conference:
    • Press *0 operator assistance (small fee may apply).
    • Press *6 mute/unmute individual line.
• Shared-screen support (VNC session) will be started 5 minutes before the call at: http://vnc2.cim3.net:5800/
  • view-only password: "uos"
  • if you plan to be logging into this shared-screen option (which the speaker may be navigating), and you are not familiar with the process, please try to call in 5 minutes before the start of the session so that we can work out the connection logistics. Help on this will generally not be available once the presentation starts.
  • people behind corporate firewalls may have difficulty accessing this. If that is the case, please download the slides linked to the respective agenda item below and runing them locally. The speaker will prompt you to advance the slides during the talk.

• Prior registration is mandatory. Please refer to UpperOntologySummit/UosApplicationDialogMeeting_2006_03_15/MeetingLogistics for details
  • This session, like all our other events, is open to the public. See map

• For Virtual Speaker Session Tips and Ground Rules - see: VirtualSpeakerSessionTips

• Please note that this session will be recorded, and the audio archives is expected to be made available as open content to our community membership and the public at-large under our prevailing open IPR policy.

Broader Context

• There are a number of extensive upper ontologies in existence today, including SUMO, OpenCyc Upper Ontology, DOLCE, and many others emerging from the OWL community and application areas such as biomedical research. The goal of this summit is to get the "custodians" of the leading existing upper ontologies to agree to a subset, an intersection of these ontologies, that could serve as a core to support interoperability among the future explosively growing population of ontologies.
• There is Upper Ontology Developers and Key Participants meeting on March 14th.
• There are two Public Meetings on March 15th: this meeting and the formal Summit in the afternoon.

Purposes of Application Dialog Meeting

In addition to the key public upper ontology custodians, organizers, and key participants, stakeholders, early adopters, potential users and potential funders of ongoing upper ontology research development will be invited to discuss mutual concerns.

Agenda

9:20 AM - Welcome and Introductions by the Session Chair - Dagobert Soergel - slides

9:30 AM - Panel of Upper Ontologists present examples of application of upper ontologies

• Cyc applications - Doug Lenat - slides
• SUMO applications - Adam Pease - slides
• ISO 15926 applications - Matthew West - slides
• DOLCE applications - Nicola Guarino - slides

10:30 AM - Break

10:50 AM - Open multi-way dialogue of the potential of upper ontologies with triple panel:

• Upper ontologists
• Stakeholders
• Application builders
• Panelists:
  • Chris Welty
  • Michael Uschold
  • Conor Shankey
  • Mills Davis (talking about Digital Harbor and Metatomix applications)
  • Tom Beckman
  • DaveMcComb
  • John Walker

11:50 AM - Summary and Closing remarks by the Session Chair - Dagobert Soergel

12:00 NOON - ADJOURN

Resources for this UO Appplication Dialog Session

• All session resources can be found at the session file repository at: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/UpperOntologySummit/UO-Application-Dialog-session_20050315/
  • inlcuded in there are a few audio files with unsatisfactory recording quality. They are appropriately labeled as "bad" ... but parts of their content may still be useful. Feel free to explore.

Some Additional Resources

• "Towards the Use of an Upper Ontology" - whitepaper by MITRE

• Suggested Upper Merged Ontology

• DOLCE and other ontologies developed at the ISTC-CNR Laboratory for Applied Ontology

• the OpenCyc Ontology

• IEEE P1600.1 Standard Upper Ontology Working Group (SUO WG) Home Page
  • Ontology: An ontology is similar to a dictionary or glossary, but with greater detail and structure that enables computers to process its content. An ontology consists of a set of concepts, axioms, and relationships that describe a domain of interest.
  • Upper Ontology: An upper ontology is limited to concepts that are meta, generic, abstract and philosophical, and therefore are general enough to address (at a high level) a broad range of domain areas. Concepts specific to given domains will not be included; however, this standard will provide a structure and a set of general concepts upon which domain ontologies (e.g. medical, financial, engineering, etc.) could be constructed.

• I find it critical to remember that every ontology is a treaty, a social agreement, among people with some common motive in sharing. What we need the most are ontologies that unleash the potential of the world's population to make useful contributions to our collective knowledge." From Tom Gruber Interview in SIGSEMIS Bulletin

• A common subset ontology? --PatCassidy
  • Comments --JohnSowa:

That is a much more restricted and a much more achievable goal than a common upper ontology. For most of those things, there already are official standards or de facto standards: 1) The Types for "Named entities"... person names, person titles, company/organization names, geopolitical entity names, locations and geographical places, dates,&,times,,individual events (e.g. World War II), percentages, monetary amounts,,measures One of the first tasks we should do is to compile an inventory with pointers to all the official and de facto standards for the named entities that Pat listed above. Any proposed ontology must accommodate all of them.

• A Minimalist Upper Ontology and Gist: Minimalist Upper Ontology -

DaveMcComb

• Semantic Wikis try to combine the strengths of Semantic Web (machine processable, data integration, complex queries) and Wiki (easy to use and contribute, strongly interconnected, collaborativeness) technologies - see: http://colab.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SICoP/SemanticWikisandInformationManagementWG

• Building Semantic Webs for e-government with Wiki technology. Recent Paper Proposes 2-level Wiki to improve access to information.

• February 9-10, 2006, 4th Semantic Interoperability for E-Government Conference

• March 6-9, 2006, 2006 Semantic Technology Conference, San Jose, California

• June 11-14, 2006, 3rd European Semantic Web Conference, Budva, Montenegro.

• November 5-9, 2006, 5th International Semantic Web Conference, Athens, Georgia. SICoP Participation Invited.

• November 9-11, 2006, International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems, Baltimore, Maryland.

• Ontology Driven Architectures and Potential Uses of the Semantic Web in Systems and Software Engineering

• RDF/OWL Representation of WordNet

• Domain Specific vs. Upper Level Ontologies at the 5th International Workshop on Web Semantics (WebS 2006)

---

Map of Meeting Venue

---