OntologySummit2007 Survey/HansTeijgeler

From OntologPSMW
Jump to: navigation, search
[ ]

Please make sure you refer to the Ontology Summit 2007 & OntologySummit2007_Survey pages for the full context of the input.        (1A1)


Question 1 Respondant Info     (1A2)

Name: Hans Teijgeler     (1A3)

Question 2 Affiliated - I am affiliated with the following constituencies/communities (please check all that apply)     (1A4)

[X] Formal ontology communities     (1A5)

[X] Semantic Web communities     (1A6)

[ ] Linguistic communities     (1A7)

[ ] Concept Map community     (1A8)

[ ] Topic Map community     (1A9)

[ ] SEARCH communities     (1A10)

[ ] Web 2.0 communities     (1A11)

[ ] Thesauri community     (1A12)

[X] Taxonomy communities     (1A13)

[ ] Metadata communities     (1A14)

[ ] XML communities     (1A15)

[ ] Applications Development, Software Engineering and Information Model communities     (1A16)

[ ] System Architecture communities     (1A17)

[ ] Biomedical communities     (1A18)

[X] Standards Development communities     (1A19)

[ ] Other (please specify): (Not Answered)     (1A20)

Question 2a Representing - I represent the perspective of the following constituency/community (please pick one; if you want to provide input from more than one perspective, please return a separate form):     (1A21)

[ ] 1. Formal ontology communities     (1A22)

[ ] 2. Semantic Web communities     (1A23)

[ ] 3. Linguistic communities     (1A24)

[ ] 4. Concept Map community     (1A25)

[ ] 5. Topic Map community     (1A26)

[ ] 6. SEARCH communities     (1A27)

[ ] 7. Web 2.0 communities     (1A28)

[ ] 8. Thesauri community     (1A29)

[ ] 9. Taxonomy communities     (1A30)

[ ] 10. Metadata communities     (1A31)

[ ] 11. XML communities     (1A32)

[ ] 12. Applications Development, Software Engineering and Information Model communities     (1A33)

[ ] 13. System Architecture communities     (1A34)

[ ] 14. Biomedical communities     (1A35)

[X] 15. Standards Development communities     (1A36)

[ ] 16. Other (please specify): (Not Answered)     (1A37)

Question 2b Specific Community     (1A38)

or sub-community I am affiliated with: ISO 15926     (1A39)

Question 2c Expertise Self Assessment - With respect to the perspective you are representing and providing input from, I am a/an:     (1A40)

[ ] 1. informed layman     (1A41)

[ ] 2. practitioner     (1A42)

[ ] 3. expert     (1A43)

[X] 4. other (please specify): conceptualizer     (1A44)

Question 3a Ontology Value -     (1A45)

"Integration, Sharing, Exchange, and Hand-over of Plant Lifecycle Information"     (1A46)

Question 3b Ontology Issues -     (1A47)

"Hiding the complexities for the "normal" engineer"     (1A48)

Question 3c Ontology Problems -     (1A49)

"1)Mapping between ISO 15926 and RDF/OWL The "OWLites" are not interested in what we do,     (1A50)

and hence not eager to help (there are good exceptions)     (1A51)

2)What we practice is not taught on universities"     (1A52)

Question 3d Corresponding Solutions -     (1A53)

"1)Convince Tim Berbers-Lee (so far that was impossible).     (1A54)

2)Convince the universities (not tried seriously yet)"     (1A55)

Question 4aGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:     (1A56)

Term: RDL (Reference Data Library)     (1A57)

Gloss: The terms used within facilities for the process industry     (1A58)

Reference (citation/url): ISO 15926-4     (1A59)

Artifact (name/version): RDL (Work in Progress)     (1A60)

- Artifact Ref. (url): http://www.posccaesar.com/ select "POSC Caesar Core RDL based on IS-model"     (1A61)

Question 4a1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?     (1A62)

[ ] 1. 1 - totally unlikely     (1A63)

[ ] 2. 2 - rarely     (1A64)

[X] 3. 3 - sometimes     (1A65)

[ ] 4. 4 - quite often     (1A66)

[ ] 5. 5 - almost always     (1A67)

Question 4a2 Additional Remarks -     (1A68)

"Until now we have focussed on the taxonomy. Once that is in a good shape, we will     (1A69)

add so-called Object Information Models by means of ISO 15926-7 templates."     (1A70)

Question 4bGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:     (1A71)


Term: Object Information Model     (1A72)

Gloss: represents the types of information about members of a class or     (1A73)

meta-information about a class itself     (1A74)

Reference (citation/url): ISO 15926-7     (1A75)

Artifact (name/version): OIM (just started)     (1A76)

- Artifact Ref. (url): tbd     (1A77)

Question 4b1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?     (1A78)

[ ] 1. 1 - totally unlikely     (1A79)

[ ] 2. 2 - rarely     (1A80)

[ ] 3. 3 - sometimes     (1A81)

[ ] 4. 4 - quite often     (1A82)

[X] 5. 5 - almost always     (1A83)

Question 4b2 Additional Remarks -     (1A84)

"An OIM is not a separate entity, but a dynamic collection of pointers to templates     (1A85)

in which a particular class in involved."     (1A86)

Question 4cGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:     (1A87)


Term: (Not Answered)     (1A88)

Gloss: (Not Answered)     (1A89)

Reference (citation/url): (Not Answered)     (1A90)

Artifact (name/version): (Not Answered)     (1A91)

- Artifact Ref. (url): (Not Answered)     (1A92)

Question 4c1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?     (1A93)

[ ] 1. 1 - totally unlikely     (1A94)

[ ] 2. 2 - rarely     (1A95)

[ ] 3. 3 - sometimes     (1A96)

[ ] 4. 4 - quite often     (1A97)

[ ] 5. 5 - almost always     (1A98)

Question 4c2 Additional Remarks -     (1A99)

"(Not Answered)"     (1A100)

Question 4dGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:     (1A101)

Term: (Not Answered)     (1A102)

Gloss: (Not Answered)     (1A103)

Reference (citation/url): (Not Answered)     (1A104)

Artifact (name/version): (Not Answered)     (1A105)

- Artifact Ref. (url): (Not Answered)     (1A106)

Question 4d1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?     (1A107)

[ ] 1. 1 - totally unlikely     (1A108)

[ ] 2. 2 - rarely     (1A109)

[ ] 3. 3 - sometimes     (1A110)

[ ] 4. 4 - quite often     (1A111)

[ ] 5. 5 - almost always     (1A112)

Question 4d2 Additional Remarks -     (1A113)

"(Not Answered)"     (1A114)

Question 4eGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:     (1A115)

Term: (Not Answered)     (1A116)

Gloss: (Not Answered)     (1A117)

Reference (citation/url): (Not Answered)     (1A118)

Artifact (name/version): (Not Answered)     (1A119)

- Artifact Ref. (url): (Not Answered)     (1A120)

Question 4e1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?     (1A121)

[ ] 1. 1 - totally unlikely     (1A122)

[ ] 2. 2 - rarely     (1A123)

[ ] 3. 3 - sometimes     (1A124)

[ ] 4. 4 - quite often     (1A125)

[ ] 5. 5 - almost always     (1A126)

Question 4e2 Additional Remarks -     (1A127)

"(Not Answered)"     (1A128)

Question 4fGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:     (1A129)

Term: (Not Answered)     (1A130)

Gloss: (Not Answered)     (1A131)

Reference (citation/url): (Not Answered)     (1A132)

Artifact (name/version): (Not Answered)     (1A133)

- Artifact Ref. (url): (Not Answered)     (1A134)

Question 4f1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?     (1A135)

[ ] 1. 1 - totally unlikely     (1A136)

[ ] 2. 2 - rarely     (1A137)

[ ] 3. 3 - sometimes     (1A138)

[ ] 4. 4 - quite often     (1A139)

[ ] 5. 5 - almost always     (1A140)

Question 4f2 Additional Remarks -     (1A141)

"(Not Answered)"     (1A142)

Question 4gGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:     (1A143)

Term: (Not Answered)     (1A144)

Gloss (definition): (Not Answered)     (1A145)

Reference (citation/url): (Not Answered)     (1A146)

Artifact (name/version): (Not Answered)     (1A147)

- Artifact Ref. (url): (Not Answered)     (1A148)

Question 4g1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?     (1A149)

[ ] 1. 1 - totally unlikely     (1A150)

[ ] 2. 2 - rarely     (1A151)

[ ] 3. 3 - sometimes     (1A152)

[ ] 4. 4 - quite often     (1A153)

[ ] 5. 5 - almost always     (1A154)

Question 4g2 Additional Remarks -     (1A155)

"(Not Answered)"     (1A156)

Question 4hGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:     (1A157)

Term: (Not Answered)     (1A158)

Gloss: (Not Answered)     (1A159)

Reference (citation/url): (Not Answered)     (1A160)

Artifact (name/version): (Not Answered)     (1A161)

- Artifact Ref. (url): (Not Answered)     (1A162)

Question 4h1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?     (1A163)

[ ] 1. 1 - totally unlikely     (1A164)

[ ] 2. 2 - rarely     (1A165)

[ ] 3. 3 - sometimes     (1A166)

[ ] 4. 4 - quite often     (1A167)

[ ] 5. 5 - almost always     (1A168)

Question 4h2 Additional Remarks -     (1A169)

"(Not Answered)"     (1A170)

Question 5 Confirm Participation - where,     (1A171)

a 'convener' is a participant who provides substantive contribution to the Ontology Summit 2007     (1A172)

initiative (through the online discourse, this survey, and other events leading to or during     (1A173)

the workshops and the written communique process), and     (1A174)

a 'co-sponsor' is an organization who is providing technical or funding support (e.g. supporting     (1A175)

member(s) of its technical staff to participate as a 'convener'), and/or endorsing the objective     (1A176)

[ ] I agree that my name can be listed as a 'convener' of Ontology Summit 2007     (1A178)

[ ] I will consider endorsing the Ontology Summit 2007 communique. Please send it to me for     (1A179)

review when it is ready. I will confirm my endorsement after the review.     (1A180)

[ ] I confirm that you may list my organization as a 'co-sponsor' for     (1A181)

Question 5a Co-Sponsor confirmation:     (1A183)

Organization Name: (Not Answered)     (1A184)

Link (url) to Logo: (Not Answered)     (1A185)



This page has been migrated from the OntologWiki - Click here for original page     (1A186)

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox
Share