Actions

Ontolog Forum

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Ontology Summit 2012: (Track-4) "Large-scale domain applications" Community Input

Track Co-Champions: Dr. Steve Ray and Dr. Trish Whetzel

Mission Statement

This track will help to ground the discussions in the other tracks and bring key challenges to light by describing current large-scale systems and systems of systems that either use, or could use, ontologies in their deployment. "Large-scale" can mean either very large data sets, very complex data sets, federated systems, highly distributed systems, or real-time, continuous data systems. Examples of large data sets might include scientific observations and studies; complex data sets could be technical data packages for manufactured products, or electronic health records; federated systems could include information sharing to combat terrorism, highly distributed systems includes items such as the smart electrical grid (aka Smart Grid), and real-time systems include network management systems. Of course, some big systems might include all five aspects.   

see also: OntologySummit2012_Applications_Synthesis


Enter your input below ... (please identify yourself and date your entry)

Entry by Steve Ray, 2/21/2012

  • Observations / Lessons learned:
    • UML to OWL is a common requirement for legacy systems
      • Need better tools to help interpret legacy systems, transform into semantic systems.
      • Starting from scratch is rare.
    • Ontology patterns are very helpful, and encourage model reuse
    • Look for the 80-20 rule of semantic development
    • Semantic techniques work best when not compromised by implementation tradeoffs
    • Semantic methods are faster to implement and easier to maintain
    • Semantic approaches are particularly suited to systems with many complex constraints, rules, laws, with frequent changes
  • Needs:
    • Need better standards for common elements:
      • Datatypes (Are xsd types enough? I think not)
      • Ontology patterns (e.g. whole/part patterns)
      • Collect ontological primitives from observation data
    • Need repositories (When is OOR going to be ready for production use?)
      • Repositories of ontological patterns could be more useful than repositories of ontologies
    • Need industrial strength semantic services resident in the cloud
    • Need better visualization tools and approaches

  • ...