Search results
- See: http://www.cyc.com/cyc/technology/whatiscyc_dir/whatsincyc & OpenCyc192 bytes (20 words) - 03:07, 14 December 2015
- <br/>• Upper Ontology Summit presentation on OpenCyc [[UpperOntologySummitMeeting_2006_03_15]] <br/>• "Is OpenCyc doomed to be the new Esperanto, or is OOR doomed to be the new Electronic D2 KB (295 words) - 03:01, 21 February 2024
- ...Cycorp. The source code written in <nowiki>CycL</nowiki> released with the OpenCyc system is licensed as open source, to increase its usefulness in supporting952 bytes (142 words) - 03:56, 14 December 2015
- * Panel Discussion: "SUMO, [[OpenCyc]] Upper Ontology & DOLCE: Compare and Contrast" - [[OntologDiscussion/Commo2 KB (209 words) - 05:10, 26 April 2013
- ...Group. Most of the classes in the current COSMO have been taken from the OpenCyc OWL version 0.78, and from the SUMO. Other elements were taken from other ...and Inference Rules) existing in the public ontologies OpenCyc (http://www.opencyc.org/ The version used was 0.78b OWL version) and SUMO (http://www.ontologyp5 KB (741 words) - 03:07, 14 December 2015
- ...mber of extensive upper ontologies in existence today, including [[SUMO]], OpenCyc Upper Ontology, [[DOLCE]], and many others emerging from the OWL community ** [[DougLenat|Doug Lenat]] - [http://www.cyc.com/cyc/opencyc/overview OpenCyc] - '''[http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/UpperOntologySummit/UO-Summit-Meet7 KB (934 words) - 08:50, 9 January 2016
- ...mber of extensive upper ontologies in existence today, including [[SUMO]], OpenCyc Upper Ontology, [[DOLCE]], and many others emerging from the OWL community * [http://opencyc.org/ the OpenCyc Ontology]10 KB (1,368 words) - 08:49, 9 January 2016
- * [[DougLenat|Doug Lenat]] - OpenCyc5 KB (703 words) - 08:50, 9 January 2016
- *** OpenCyc WebServices [LeoObrst / 2008.08.15]6 KB (678 words) - 06:25, 9 January 2016
- Artifact (name/version): [[OpenCYC]] - Artifact Ref. (url): http://www.cyc.com/cyc/opencyc/overview10 KB (1,285 words) - 08:03, 9 January 2016
- * [[OpenCyc|CYC]], [[SUMO]], [[DOLCE]], [[PSL]], [[BFO]], [[GUM]], [http://www.tc184-sc8 KB (1,074 words) - 07:55, 9 January 2016
- * '''Dr. DougLenat''' (Cycorp) - "Is OpenCyc doomed to be the new Esperanto, or is OOR doomed to be the new Electronic D ** '''DougLenat''' - "Is OpenCyc doomed to be the new Esperanto, or is OOR doomed to be the new Electronic D29 KB (3,961 words) - 06:22, 9 January 2016
- ** '''DougLenat''' - "Is OpenCyc doomed to be the new Esperanto, or is OOR doomed to be the new Electronic D *** I will be talking about OpenCyc and [[ResearchCyc]]16 KB (2,315 words) - 07:43, 9 January 2016
- ...y announced knowledge structure that integrates six major knowledge bases (OpenCyc, Wikipedia, Wikidata, GeoNames, DBpedia, UMBEL) under the KBpedia Knowledge7 KB (819 words) - 20:00, 7 December 2016
- *** a panel with speaker representating: [[SUMO]], OpenCyc Upper Ontology, [[DOLCE]], ... (suggested by PeterYim)9 KB (1,171 words) - 05:59, 9 January 2016
- ontologies (WordNet, OpenCyc) and specific ontologies (e.g., Process10 KB (1,446 words) - 07:52, 9 January 2016
- *** a panel with speaker representating: [[SUMO]], OpenCyc Upper Ontology, [[DOLCE]], ... (suggested by PeterYim)9 KB (1,170 words) - 06:00, 9 January 2016
- [12:22] Andrew Dougherty: OpenCYC has #$DisasterEvent9 KB (1,181 words) - 18:29, 16 December 2022
- *** a panel with speaker representating: [[SUMO]], OpenCyc Upper Ontology, [[DOLCE]], ... (suggested by PeterYim)9 KB (1,260 words) - 05:59, 9 January 2016
- *** a panel with speaker representating: [[SUMO]], OpenCyc Upper Ontology, [[DOLCE]], ... (suggested by PeterYim)9 KB (1,242 words) - 06:00, 9 January 2016
- ...nk to the recording? What symposium is being linked to? ++Question about OpenCyc DouglasRMiles: Projects like OpenCyc, LarkC where govts only paying Cycorp money if they share. So unless there22 KB (3,752 words) - 16:05, 31 March 2018
- *** a panel with speaker representating: [[SUMO]], OpenCyc Upper Ontology, [[DOLCE]], ... (suggested by PeterYim)11 KB (1,494 words) - 06:01, 9 January 2016
- ** a panel with speaker representating: [[SUMO]], OpenCyc Upper Ontology, [[DOLCE]], ... (suggested by PeterYim)11 KB (1,456 words) - 06:01, 9 January 2016
- through OpenCyc and [[ResearchCyc]], which raises issues of how10 KB (1,451 words) - 06:05, 9 January 2016
- *** a panel with speaker representating: [[SUMO]], OpenCyc Upper Ontology, [[DOLCE]], ... (suggested by PeterYim)11 KB (1,511 words) - 05:59, 9 January 2016
- ** a panel with speaker representating: [[SUMO]], OpenCyc Upper Ontology, [[DOLCE]], ... (suggested by PeterYim)12 KB (1,600 words) - 06:03, 9 January 2016
- *** a panel with speaker representating: [[SUMO]], OpenCyc Upper Ontology, [[DOLCE]], ... (suggested by PeterYim)13 KB (1,716 words) - 06:01, 9 January 2016
- ** a panel with speaker representating: [[SUMO]], OpenCyc Upper Ontology, [[DOLCE]], ... (suggested by PeterYim)12 KB (1,691 words) - 06:03, 9 January 2016
- *** a panel with speaker representating: [[SUMO]], OpenCyc Upper Ontology, [[DOLCE]], ... (suggested by PeterYim)12 KB (1,688 words) - 06:00, 9 January 2016
- ** a panel with speaker representating: [[SUMO]], OpenCyc Upper Ontology, [[DOLCE]], ... (suggested by PeterYim)13 KB (1,779 words) - 06:03, 9 January 2016
- ...issue that has inhibited the wide use of existing upper ontologies such as OpenCyc, SUMO, and DOLCE is the complexity of such knowledge representations. With14 KB (2,074 words) - 06:10, 9 January 2016
- ...|Pat Cassidy]]: @MikeGruninger: Do you think that JohnSowa's idea of using OpenCyc as the base for 60,000 [[OpenCYc]] hierarchy is loaded and axioms are added, how do you imagine this will in33 KB (4,756 words) - 07:26, 9 January 2016
- ** a panel with speaker representating: [[SUMO]], OpenCyc Upper Ontology, [[DOLCE]], ... (suggested by PeterYim)14 KB (1,898 words) - 06:01, 9 January 2016
- ** a panel with speaker representating: [[SUMO]], OpenCyc Upper Ontology, [[DOLCE]], ... (suggested by PeterYim)13 KB (1,852 words) - 06:02, 9 January 2016
- ** a panel with speaker representating: [[SUMO]], OpenCyc Upper Ontology, [[DOLCE]], ... (suggested by PeterYim)14 KB (1,927 words) - 06:02, 9 January 2016
- ** a panel with speaker representing: [[SUMO]], OpenCyc Upper Ontology, [[DOLCE]], ... (suggested by PeterYim/2005.01.20) -- to be14 KB (1,849 words) - 06:05, 9 January 2016
- ontologies (WordNet, OpenCyc) and specific ontologies (e.g., Process16 KB (2,253 words) - 15:20, 22 September 2018
- ** [[DougLenat]] - [[OpenCyc]]21 KB (2,775 words) - 05:53, 26 April 2013
- [13:22] John Sowa: Open Cyc is the freely available ontology + software. See opencyc.org [13:23] DouglasRMiles: since OpenCYC.org has been down a new port is being developed https://github.com/TeamSPoo14 KB (1,916 words) - 19:23, 20 February 2019
- * [[OpenCYC]] ** References http://www.cyc.com/cyc/opencyc/overview22 KB (2,934 words) - 07:56, 9 January 2016
- * [[OpenCYC]] ** References http://www.cyc.com/cyc/opencyc/overview22 KB (2,943 words) - 06:17, 9 January 2016
- :likes relation describe via OpenCyc, but part of the LOD cloud: http://bit.ly/YgLgtk ...[[KingsleyIdehen|Kingsley Idehen]]: http://lod.openlinksw.com/c/G34LSH7 -- OpenCyc Likes & Dislikes52 KB (6,863 words) - 06:47, 9 January 2016
- ...Fn]] Excitement))</nowiki> Cyc has done some modeling for Enthusiasm, etc. OpenCyc37 KB (4,904 words) - 06:38, 9 January 2016
- OpenCyc (I believe because including it would allow too much, and too easy, reverse versions of OpenCyc (through 2.0). OpenCyc 4.0 makes it difficult to access the Cyc environment.108 KB (14,522 words) - 08:25, 9 January 2016