Search results

= Bobbin Teegarden = ''... Bobbin, at your convenience, please edit and expand on this page so the community

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [12:48] MikeBennett: @Bobbin +1

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [12:45] Bobbin Teegarden: In your case based reasoning, how do you decide which cases are

** A point raised by [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] in http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2014_

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [12:53] ToddSchneider: Bobbin, One approach to 'context' is use of the notion 'relevance'. What is 'relev

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [12:39] Bobbin Teegarden: DOL standard from OMG: https://www.omg.org/spec/DOL/About-DOL/

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] Bobbin Teegarden: MikeU: Is there a way to create an ontology of your sparql queri

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]]

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [12:56] ToddSchneider: Bobbin, yes. Excellent point.

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [12:39] Bobbin Teegarden: Can you create a knowledge graph in UML?

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [13:00] Donna Fritzsche: good question Bobbin

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [13:41] Donna Fritzsche: @bobbin - thanks

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]]

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [12:59] Bobbin Teegarden: @Janet ... and that could be a good thing -- they pick up the i

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [13:00] RaviSharma: Bobbin - yes

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [13:42] ToddSchneider: Bobbin, possibly. I'm not aware of research into 'self-referentiality'.

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [12:17] John Sowa: Bobbin, yes. Context is essential for interpreting anything in any version of lan

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [13:17] Bobbin Teegarden: Isn't the main difference between a taxonomy and an ontology tha

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [12:48] Bobbin Teegarden: @Barry space (where) and time (when) are two of the aspects of a

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]]

[09:56] [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]]: @Marco What are you using for the rules? How execute them? [10:13] MarcoRospocher: @Bobbin: we use Apache Jena RETE. Rules of the form "A and B and C ---> D,E"

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [12:33] Mike: @Bobbin everything in an ontology is the context for something. The question is wha

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [12:43] Gary Berg-Cross: @Bobbin I would say there are a few ways we flesh out related contexts. Domain exp

[09:49] anonymous morphed into [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [10:29] [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]]: The broader subject, like 'Ontology Integration' -- is more in

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [12:59] Bobbin Teegarden: @JohnS is the 'context you feed FCA tools a list or graph? is t

[10:26] [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]]: Can't there be concentrators of concentrators, et al...? [10:28] [[RaviSharma|Ravi Sharma]]: @Bobbin - yes

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [13:40] RaviSharma: yes Bobbin, and for some of us the conceptual and ontological constructs are same or v

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [12:48] Mike Bennett: @Bobbin that's the Kantian thing. I'm making a distinction between that and ontolog

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [13:00] RaviSharma: Bobbin yes OMG would also be great because it has two namely ODM linking OWL and M

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [12:55] Robert Rovetto: @Bobbin: in the context of this presentation it was used in the sense of the (argua

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [13:38] ToddSchneider: Bobbin, possibly. But the self-referential aspect is not fully represented in a fr

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [12:42] David Eddy: @Bobbin... yes... CDD+

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [12:39] Bobbin Teegarden: Knowledge Graph Conference: We are excited to share with you our

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [13:16] John Sowa: Bobbin, 'could be' is a possibility, 'would be' is a necessity. Both versions dep

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]]

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [13:20] ToddSchneider: Bobbin, John's slides are available from today's meeting page.

Added by Bobbin Teegarden: Take a look at our book Cognitive Patterns, available free on th

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]]

** [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]], [[ChuckRehberg|Chuck Rehberg]], [[ConradBock|Conrad Bock]], [[

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [13:06] janet singer: @Bobbin That was Matthews language. I agree with point of your question.

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]]

[10:24] [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]]: About location suggestions, any chance we could alternate east [10:28] [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]]: @Leo @Mike I agree, the wider perspect brought out things we w

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [13:09] TerryLongstreth: @Bobbin: I want the car to decide whether to hit the child or the policeman

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [12:18] Cory Casanave: @Bobbin, what format? Can you open from here: https://github.com/ModelDriven/Concep

[14:13] Donna Fritzsche: Thanks Bobbin, good references. [14:14] ToddSchneider: Bobbin, UML has too many constraints for non-object oriented domains (i.e., embedd

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [12:30] MikeBennett: @Bobbin that depends on whether the diagram elements make any explicit commitment a

[18:39] Bobbin Teegarden: Aren't all things relative things? Is there an 'absolute' thing [18:51] [[AlexShkotin|Alex Shkotin]]: @Bobbin, it was a good idea to change chat room!

** [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]]: @Steve Are you implying, perhaps, that the (ontology)Model IS

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]]

* [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [12:27] RaviSharma: @Bobbin, they are at link http://ontologforum.org/index.php?title=ConferenceCall_20