Search results
- [09:56] [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]]: @Marco What are you using for the rules? How execute them? [10:13] MarcoRospocher: @Bobbin: we use Apache Jena RETE. Rules of the form "A and B and C ---> D,E"19 KB (2,770 words) - 06:51, 9 January 2016
- * [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [12:33] Mike: @Bobbin everything in an ontology is the context for something. The question is wha8 KB (1,104 words) - 14:54, 28 October 2019
- * [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [12:43] Gary Berg-Cross: @Bobbin I would say there are a few ways we flesh out related contexts. Domain exp11 KB (1,530 words) - 19:34, 3 May 2021
- [09:49] anonymous morphed into [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [10:29] [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]]: The broader subject, like 'Ontology Integration' -- is more in29 KB (4,016 words) - 06:52, 9 January 2016
- * [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [12:59] Bobbin Teegarden: @JohnS is the 'context you feed FCA tools a list or graph? is t12 KB (1,761 words) - 21:54, 22 April 2020
- [10:26] [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]]: Can't there be concentrators of concentrators, et al...? [10:28] [[RaviSharma|Ravi Sharma]]: @Bobbin - yes20 KB (2,821 words) - 06:50, 9 January 2016
- * [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [13:40] RaviSharma: yes Bobbin, and for some of us the conceptual and ontological constructs are same or v15 KB (2,208 words) - 06:03, 14 March 2021
- * [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [12:48] Mike Bennett: @Bobbin that's the Kantian thing. I'm making a distinction between that and ontolog8 KB (1,098 words) - 22:38, 11 February 2020
- * [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [13:00] RaviSharma: Bobbin yes OMG would also be great because it has two namely ODM linking OWL and M9 KB (1,317 words) - 03:35, 21 July 2021
- * [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [12:55] Robert Rovetto: @Bobbin: in the context of this presentation it was used in the sense of the (argua9 KB (1,237 words) - 02:39, 14 March 2021
- * [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [13:38] ToddSchneider: Bobbin, possibly. But the self-referential aspect is not fully represented in a fr10 KB (1,334 words) - 20:22, 14 March 2018
- * [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [12:42] David Eddy: @Bobbin... yes... CDD+17 KB (2,453 words) - 21:25, 25 March 2020
- * [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [12:39] Bobbin Teegarden: Knowledge Graph Conference: We are excited to share with you our14 KB (2,079 words) - 03:49, 12 June 2020
- * [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [13:16] John Sowa: Bobbin, 'could be' is a possibility, 'would be' is a necessity. Both versions dep16 KB (2,359 words) - 14:06, 12 June 2019
- * [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]]5 KB (628 words) - 18:30, 16 December 2022
- * [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [13:20] ToddSchneider: Bobbin, John's slides are available from today's meeting page.10 KB (1,433 words) - 04:22, 19 November 2019
- Added by Bobbin Teegarden: Take a look at our book Cognitive Patterns, available free on th5 KB (632 words) - 16:30, 1 June 2023
- * [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]]10 KB (1,426 words) - 19:26, 11 May 2020
- ** [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]], [[ChuckRehberg|Chuck Rehberg]], [[ConradBock|Conrad Bock]], [[30 KB (3,877 words) - 03:00, 26 April 2020
- * [[BobbinTeegarden|Bobbin Teegarden]] [13:06] janet singer: @Bobbin That was Matthews language. I agree with point of your question.11 KB (1,589 words) - 04:19, 22 February 2020