From OntologPSMW

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Ontology Summit Theme Suggestions)
(Ontology Summit Theme Suggestions)
Line 51: Line 51:
 
**Fifteen years on, what can we bring to answering this challenge from 2007?  
 
**Fifteen years on, what can we bring to answering this challenge from 2007?  
 
***”The challenge, this year, put before the various constituencies and communities involved, is to clarify what everyone means when they use the term "ontology" or when they refer to these semantic structures. Our objective is to define and agree to a systematic means of categorizing the many kinds of things that fall broadly within the "ontology" spectrum. By doing so, the research, development and Internet communities would have a better way of comparing, combining and mapping ontologies to one another (apples to apples). The range of what people call "ontologies" covers folksonomies, taxonomies, thesauri, conceptual models, and formal logic-based models to name just a few flavors.”
 
***”The challenge, this year, put before the various constituencies and communities involved, is to clarify what everyone means when they use the term "ontology" or when they refer to these semantic structures. Our objective is to define and agree to a systematic means of categorizing the many kinds of things that fall broadly within the "ontology" spectrum. By doing so, the research, development and Internet communities would have a better way of comparing, combining and mapping ontologies to one another (apples to apples). The range of what people call "ontologies" covers folksonomies, taxonomies, thesauri, conceptual models, and formal logic-based models to name just a few flavors.”
 +
**The success at converging on the 3-part definition for knowledge graphs in the 2020 communiqué suggests an approach for resolving previously insurmountable issues.

Revision as of 11:53, 13 October 2021

[ ]

Ontology Summit Theme Suggestions     (1)