OntologySummit2007 Survey/FrankMcCabe

From OntologPSMW
Revision as of 09:34, 18 December 2012 by PeterYim (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
[ ]

Please make sure you refer to the OntologySummit2007 & OntologySummit2007_Survey pages for the full context of the input.        (1A1)


Question 1 Respondant Info     (1A2)

Name:  Francis mccabe 

Question 2 Affiliated - I am affiliated with the following constituencies/communities (please check all that apply)     (1A3)

[  ]  Formal ontology communities
[X]  Semantic Web communities
[  ]  Linguistic communities
[  ]  Concept Map community
[  ]  Topic Map community
[  ]  [[SEARCH]] communities
[  ]  Web 2.0 communities
[  ]  Thesauri community
[  ]  Taxonomy communities
[  ]  Metadata communities
[  ]  XML communities
[X]  Applications Development, Software Engineering and Information Model communities
[X]  System Architecture communities
[  ]  Biomedical communities
[X]  Standards Development communities
[  ]  Other (please specify):  (Not Answered) 

Question 2a Representing - I represent the perspective of the following constituency/community (please pick one; if you want to provide input from more than one perspective, please return a separate form):     (1A4)

[  ]  1. Formal ontology communities
[  ]  2. Semantic Web communities
[  ]  3. Linguistic communities
[  ]  4. Concept Map community
[  ]  5. Topic Map community
[  ]  6. [[SEARCH]] communities
[  ]  7. Web 2.0 communities
[  ]  8. Thesauri community
[  ]  9. Taxonomy communities
[  ]  10. Metadata communities
[  ]  11. XML communities
[X]  12. Applications Development, Software Engineering and Information Model communities
[  ]  13. System Architecture communities
[  ]  14. Biomedical communities
[  ]  15. Standards Development communities
[  ]  16. Other (please specify):  (Not Answered) 

Question 2b Specific Community     (1A5)

or sub-community I am affiliated with:  (Not Answered) 

Question 2c Expertise Self Assessment - With respect to the perspective you are representing and providing input from, I am a/an:     (1A6)

[  ]  1. informed layman
[  ]  2. practitioner
[X]  3. expert
[  ]  4. other (please specify):  (Not Answered) 

Question 3a Ontology Value -     (1A7)

"Ontology engineering is a better level of abstraction for dealing 
with issues than Java or XML" 

Question 3b Ontology Issues -     (1A8)

"The hardest balance is that between language expressivity and 
computational requirements" 

Question 3c Ontology Problems -     (1A9)

"negation, scoping" 

Question 3d Corresponding Solutions -     (1A10)

"I dread to think, given the amount of ink spilled on negation over the years" 

Question 4aGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:     (1A11)

Term:  (Not Answered)
Gloss:  (Not Answered)
Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)
Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
- Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered) 

Question 4a1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?     (1A12)

[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
[  ]  2. 2 - rarely
[  ]  3. 3 - sometimes
[  ]  4. 4 - quite often
[  ]  5. 5 - almost always 

Question 4a2 Additional Remarks -     (1A13)

"This looks like a b---s--- question. We could spend from now until 
the end of the universe debating what an onotlogy is?" 

Question 4bGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:     (1A14)

Term:  (Not Answered)
Gloss:  (Not Answered)
Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)
Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
- Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered) 

Question 4b1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?     (1A15)

[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
[  ]  2. 2 - rarely
[  ]  3. 3 - sometimes
[  ]  4. 4 - quite often
[  ]  5. 5 - almost always 

Question 4b2 Additional Remarks -     (1A16)

"(Not Answered)" 

Question 4cGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:     (1A17)

Term:  (Not Answered)
Gloss:  (Not Answered)
Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)
Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
- Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered) 

Question 4c1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?     (1A18)

[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
[  ]  2. 2 - rarely
[  ]  3. 3 - sometimes
[  ]  4. 4 - quite often
[  ]  5. 5 - almost always 

Question 4c2 Additional Remarks -     (1A19)

"(Not Answered)" 

Question 4dGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:     (1A20)

Term:  (Not Answered)
Gloss:  (Not Answered)
Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)
Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
- Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered) 

Question 4d1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?     (1A21)

[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
[  ]  2. 2 - rarely
[  ]  3. 3 - sometimes
[  ]  4. 4 - quite often
[  ]  5. 5 - almost always 

Question 4d2 Additional Remarks -     (1A22)

"(Not Answered)" 

Question 4eGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:     (1A23)

Term:  (Not Answered)
Gloss:  (Not Answered)
Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)
Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
- Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered) 

Question 4e1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?     (1A24)

[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
[  ]  2. 2 - rarely
[  ]  3. 3 - sometimes
[  ]  4. 4 - quite often
[  ]  5. 5 - almost always 

Question 4e2 Additional Remarks -     (1A25)

"(Not Answered)" 

Question 4fGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:     (1A26)

Term:  (Not Answered)
Gloss:  (Not Answered)
Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)
Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
- Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered) 

Question 4f1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?     (1A27)

[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
[  ]  2. 2 - rarely
[  ]  3. 3 - sometimes
[  ]  4. 4 - quite often
[  ]  5. 5 - almost always 

Question 4f2 Additional Remarks -     (1A28)

"(Not Answered)" 

Question 4gGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:     (1A29)

Term:  (Not Answered)
Gloss (definition):  (Not Answered)
Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)
Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
- Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered) 

Question 4g1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?     (1A30)

[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
[  ]  2. 2 - rarely
[  ]  3. 3 - sometimes
[  ]  4. 4 - quite often
[  ]  5. 5 - almost always 

Question 4g2 Additional Remarks -     (1A31)

"(Not Answered)" 

Question 4hGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:     (1A32)

Term:  (Not Answered)
Gloss:  (Not Answered)
Reference (citation/url):  (Not Answered)
Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
- Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered) 

Question 4h1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?     (1A33)

[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
[  ]  2. 2 - rarely
[  ]  3. 3 - sometimes
[  ]  4. 4 - quite often
[  ]  5. 5 - almost always 

Question 4h2 Additional Remarks -     (1A34)

"(Not Answered)" 

Question 5 Confirm Participation - where,     (1A35)

a 'convener' is a participant who provides substantive contribution to the [[OntologySummit2007]] 
initiative (through the online discourse, this survey, and other events leading to or during 
the workshops and the written communique process), and 
a 'co-sponsor' is an organization who is providing technical or funding support (e.g. supporting 
member(s) of its technical staff to participate as a 'convener'), and/or endorsing the objective 
of this [[OntologySummit2007]], 
[  ]  I agree that my name can be listed as a 'convener' of [[OntologySummit2007]]
[  ]  I will consider endorsing the [[OntologySummit2007]] communique. Please send it to me for 
review when it is ready. I will confirm my endorsement after the review.
[  ]  I confirm that you may list my organization as a 'co-sponsor' for 
[[OntologySummit2007]] (details below). 

Question 5a Co-Sponsor confirmation:     (1A36)

Organization Name:  (Not Answered)
Link (url) to Logo:  (Not Answered) 



Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox
Share