OntologySummit2007 Survey/FrankMcCabe

From OntologPSMW
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Last updated at: 2007-04-01 20:59:41 By user: PeterYim)
 
(Last updated at: 2007-04-01 20:59:41 By user: PeterYim)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
== [[OntologySummit2007_Survey]]/Response input from [[FrankMcCabe]]  ==
 
== [[OntologySummit2007_Survey]]/Response input from [[FrankMcCabe]]  ==
  
'''''Please make sure you refer to the OntologySummit2007 & OntologySummit2007_Survey pages for the full context of the input.   '''''  
+
'''''Please make sure you refer to the [[OntologySummit2007]] & [[OntologySummit2007_Survey]] pages for the full context of the input.   '''''  
  
 
----
 
----
Line 9: Line 9:
 
Question 1 Respondant Info  
 
Question 1 Respondant Info  
  
<pre>
+
 
 
Name:  Francis mccabe  
 
Name:  Francis mccabe  
</pre>
+
 
  
 
Question 2 Affiliated -  
 
Question 2 Affiliated -  
 
I am affiliated with the following constituencies/communities  (please check all that apply)  
 
I am affiliated with the following constituencies/communities  (please check all that apply)  
  
<pre>
+
 
 
[  ]  Formal ontology communities
 
[  ]  Formal ontology communities
 
[X]  Semantic Web communities
 
[X]  Semantic Web communities
Line 22: Line 22:
 
[  ]  Concept Map community
 
[  ]  Concept Map community
 
[  ]  Topic Map community
 
[  ]  Topic Map community
[  ]  [[SEARCH]] communities
+
[  ]  SEARCH communities
 
[  ]  Web 2.0 communities
 
[  ]  Web 2.0 communities
 
[  ]  Thesauri community
 
[  ]  Thesauri community
Line 33: Line 33:
 
[X]  Standards Development communities
 
[X]  Standards Development communities
 
[  ]  Other (please specify):  (Not Answered)  
 
[  ]  Other (please specify):  (Not Answered)  
</pre>
+
 
  
 
Question 2a Representing -  
 
Question 2a Representing -  
 
I represent the perspective of the following constituency/community (please pick one; if you want to provide input from more than one perspective, please return a separate form):  
 
I represent the perspective of the following constituency/community (please pick one; if you want to provide input from more than one perspective, please return a separate form):  
  
<pre>
+
 
 
[  ]  1. Formal ontology communities
 
[  ]  1. Formal ontology communities
 
[  ]  2. Semantic Web communities
 
[  ]  2. Semantic Web communities
Line 44: Line 44:
 
[  ]  4. Concept Map community
 
[  ]  4. Concept Map community
 
[  ]  5. Topic Map community
 
[  ]  5. Topic Map community
[  ]  6. [[SEARCH]] communities
+
[  ]  6. SEARCH communities
 
[  ]  7. Web 2.0 communities
 
[  ]  7. Web 2.0 communities
 
[  ]  8. Thesauri community
 
[  ]  8. Thesauri community
Line 55: Line 55:
 
[  ]  15. Standards Development communities
 
[  ]  15. Standards Development communities
 
[  ]  16. Other (please specify):  (Not Answered)  
 
[  ]  16. Other (please specify):  (Not Answered)  
</pre>
+
 
  
 
Question 2b Specific Community  
 
Question 2b Specific Community  
  
<pre>
+
 
 
or sub-community I am affiliated with:  (Not Answered)  
 
or sub-community I am affiliated with:  (Not Answered)  
</pre>
+
 
  
 
Question 2c Expertise Self Assessment -  
 
Question 2c Expertise Self Assessment -  
 
With respect to the perspective you are representing and providing input from, I am a/an:  
 
With respect to the perspective you are representing and providing input from, I am a/an:  
  
<pre>
+
 
 
[  ]  1. informed layman
 
[  ]  1. informed layman
 
[  ]  2. practitioner
 
[  ]  2. practitioner
 
[X]  3. expert
 
[X]  3. expert
 
[  ]  4. other (please specify):  (Not Answered)  
 
[  ]  4. other (please specify):  (Not Answered)  
</pre>
+
 
  
 
Question 3a Ontology Value -  
 
Question 3a Ontology Value -  
  
<pre>
+
 
 
"Ontology engineering is a better level of abstraction for dealing  
 
"Ontology engineering is a better level of abstraction for dealing  
 
with issues than Java or XML"  
 
with issues than Java or XML"  
</pre>
+
 
  
 
Question 3b Ontology Issues -  
 
Question 3b Ontology Issues -  
  
<pre>
+
 
 
"The hardest balance is that between language expressivity and  
 
"The hardest balance is that between language expressivity and  
 
computational requirements"  
 
computational requirements"  
</pre>
+
 
  
 
Question 3c Ontology Problems -  
 
Question 3c Ontology Problems -  
  
<pre>
+
 
 
"negation, scoping"  
 
"negation, scoping"  
</pre>
+
 
  
 
Question 3d Corresponding Solutions -  
 
Question 3d Corresponding Solutions -  
  
<pre>
+
 
 
"I dread to think, given the amount of ink spilled on negation over the years"  
 
"I dread to think, given the amount of ink spilled on negation over the years"  
</pre>
+
 
  
 
Question 4aGlossary -  
 
Question 4aGlossary -  
 
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:  
 
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:  
  
<pre>
+
 
 
Term:  (Not Answered)
 
Term:  (Not Answered)
 
Gloss:  (Not Answered)
 
Gloss:  (Not Answered)
Line 108: Line 108:
 
Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
 
Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
 
- Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered)  
 
- Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered)  
</pre>
+
 
  
 
Question 4a1 Called An Ontology -  
 
Question 4a1 Called An Ontology -  
 
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?  
 
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?  
  
<pre>
+
 
 
[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
 
[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
 
[  ]  2. 2 - rarely
 
[  ]  2. 2 - rarely
Line 119: Line 119:
 
[  ]  4. 4 - quite often
 
[  ]  4. 4 - quite often
 
[  ]  5. 5 - almost always  
 
[  ]  5. 5 - almost always  
</pre>
+
 
  
 
Question 4a2 Additional Remarks -  
 
Question 4a2 Additional Remarks -  
  
<pre>
+
 
 
"This looks like a b---s--- question. We could spend from now until  
 
"This looks like a b---s--- question. We could spend from now until  
 
the end of the universe debating what an onotlogy is?"  
 
the end of the universe debating what an onotlogy is?"  
</pre>
+
 
  
 
Question 4bGlossary -  
 
Question 4bGlossary -  
 
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:  
 
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:  
  
<pre>
+
 
 
Term:  (Not Answered)
 
Term:  (Not Answered)
 
Gloss:  (Not Answered)
 
Gloss:  (Not Answered)
Line 137: Line 137:
 
Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
 
Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
 
- Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered)  
 
- Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered)  
</pre>
+
 
  
 
Question 4b1 Called An Ontology -  
 
Question 4b1 Called An Ontology -  
 
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?  
 
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?  
  
<pre>
+
 
 
[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
 
[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
 
[  ]  2. 2 - rarely
 
[  ]  2. 2 - rarely
Line 148: Line 148:
 
[  ]  4. 4 - quite often
 
[  ]  4. 4 - quite often
 
[  ]  5. 5 - almost always  
 
[  ]  5. 5 - almost always  
</pre>
+
 
  
 
Question 4b2 Additional Remarks -  
 
Question 4b2 Additional Remarks -  
  
<pre>
+
 
 
"(Not Answered)"  
 
"(Not Answered)"  
</pre>
+
 
  
 
Question 4cGlossary -  
 
Question 4cGlossary -  
 
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:  
 
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:  
  
<pre>
+
 
 
Term:  (Not Answered)
 
Term:  (Not Answered)
 
Gloss:  (Not Answered)
 
Gloss:  (Not Answered)
Line 165: Line 165:
 
Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
 
Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
 
- Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered)  
 
- Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered)  
</pre>
+
 
  
 
Question 4c1 Called An Ontology -  
 
Question 4c1 Called An Ontology -  
 
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?  
 
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?  
  
<pre>
+
 
 
[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
 
[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
 
[  ]  2. 2 - rarely
 
[  ]  2. 2 - rarely
Line 176: Line 176:
 
[  ]  4. 4 - quite often
 
[  ]  4. 4 - quite often
 
[  ]  5. 5 - almost always  
 
[  ]  5. 5 - almost always  
</pre>
+
 
  
 
Question 4c2 Additional Remarks -  
 
Question 4c2 Additional Remarks -  
  
<pre>
+
 
 
"(Not Answered)"  
 
"(Not Answered)"  
</pre>
+
 
  
 
Question 4dGlossary -  
 
Question 4dGlossary -  
 
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:  
 
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:  
  
<pre>
+
 
 
Term:  (Not Answered)
 
Term:  (Not Answered)
 
Gloss:  (Not Answered)
 
Gloss:  (Not Answered)
Line 193: Line 193:
 
Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
 
Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
 
- Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered)  
 
- Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered)  
</pre>
+
 
  
 
Question 4d1 Called An Ontology -  
 
Question 4d1 Called An Ontology -  
 
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?  
 
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?  
  
<pre>
+
 
 
[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
 
[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
 
[  ]  2. 2 - rarely
 
[  ]  2. 2 - rarely
Line 204: Line 204:
 
[  ]  4. 4 - quite often
 
[  ]  4. 4 - quite often
 
[  ]  5. 5 - almost always  
 
[  ]  5. 5 - almost always  
</pre>
+
 
  
 
Question 4d2 Additional Remarks -  
 
Question 4d2 Additional Remarks -  
  
<pre>
+
 
 
"(Not Answered)"  
 
"(Not Answered)"  
</pre>
+
 
  
 
Question 4eGlossary -  
 
Question 4eGlossary -  
 
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:  
 
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:  
  
<pre>
+
 
 
Term:  (Not Answered)
 
Term:  (Not Answered)
 
Gloss:  (Not Answered)
 
Gloss:  (Not Answered)
Line 221: Line 221:
 
Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
 
Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
 
- Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered)  
 
- Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered)  
</pre>
+
 
  
 
Question 4e1 Called An Ontology -  
 
Question 4e1 Called An Ontology -  
 
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?  
 
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?  
  
<pre>
+
 
 
[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
 
[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
 
[  ]  2. 2 - rarely
 
[  ]  2. 2 - rarely
Line 232: Line 232:
 
[  ]  4. 4 - quite often
 
[  ]  4. 4 - quite often
 
[  ]  5. 5 - almost always  
 
[  ]  5. 5 - almost always  
</pre>
+
 
  
 
Question 4e2 Additional Remarks -  
 
Question 4e2 Additional Remarks -  
  
<pre>
+
 
 
"(Not Answered)"  
 
"(Not Answered)"  
</pre>
+
 
  
 
Question 4fGlossary -  
 
Question 4fGlossary -  
 
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:  
 
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:  
  
<pre>
+
 
 
Term:  (Not Answered)
 
Term:  (Not Answered)
 
Gloss:  (Not Answered)
 
Gloss:  (Not Answered)
Line 249: Line 249:
 
Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
 
Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
 
- Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered)  
 
- Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered)  
</pre>
+
 
  
 
Question 4f1 Called An Ontology -  
 
Question 4f1 Called An Ontology -  
 
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?  
 
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?  
  
<pre>
+
 
 
[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
 
[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
 
[  ]  2. 2 - rarely
 
[  ]  2. 2 - rarely
Line 260: Line 260:
 
[  ]  4. 4 - quite often
 
[  ]  4. 4 - quite often
 
[  ]  5. 5 - almost always  
 
[  ]  5. 5 - almost always  
</pre>
+
 
  
 
Question 4f2 Additional Remarks -  
 
Question 4f2 Additional Remarks -  
  
<pre>
+
 
 
"(Not Answered)"  
 
"(Not Answered)"  
</pre>
+
 
  
 
Question 4gGlossary -  
 
Question 4gGlossary -  
 
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:  
 
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:  
  
<pre>
+
 
 
Term:  (Not Answered)
 
Term:  (Not Answered)
 
Gloss (definition):  (Not Answered)
 
Gloss (definition):  (Not Answered)
Line 277: Line 277:
 
Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
 
Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
 
- Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered)  
 
- Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered)  
</pre>
+
 
  
 
Question 4g1 Called An Ontology -  
 
Question 4g1 Called An Ontology -  
 
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?  
 
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?  
  
<pre>
+
 
 
[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
 
[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
 
[  ]  2. 2 - rarely
 
[  ]  2. 2 - rarely
Line 288: Line 288:
 
[  ]  4. 4 - quite often
 
[  ]  4. 4 - quite often
 
[  ]  5. 5 - almost always  
 
[  ]  5. 5 - almost always  
</pre>
+
 
  
 
Question 4g2 Additional Remarks -  
 
Question 4g2 Additional Remarks -  
  
<pre>
+
 
 
"(Not Answered)"  
 
"(Not Answered)"  
</pre>
+
 
  
 
Question 4hGlossary -  
 
Question 4hGlossary -  
 
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:  
 
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:  
  
<pre>
+
 
 
Term:  (Not Answered)
 
Term:  (Not Answered)
 
Gloss:  (Not Answered)
 
Gloss:  (Not Answered)
Line 305: Line 305:
 
Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
 
Artifact (name/version):  (Not Answered)
 
- Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered)  
 
- Artifact Ref. (url):  (Not Answered)  
</pre>
+
 
  
 
Question 4h1 Called An Ontology -  
 
Question 4h1 Called An Ontology -  
 
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?  
 
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?  
  
<pre>
+
 
 
[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
 
[  ]  1. 1 - totally unlikely
 
[  ]  2. 2 - rarely
 
[  ]  2. 2 - rarely
Line 316: Line 316:
 
[  ]  4. 4 - quite often
 
[  ]  4. 4 - quite often
 
[  ]  5. 5 - almost always  
 
[  ]  5. 5 - almost always  
</pre>
+
 
  
 
Question 4h2 Additional Remarks -  
 
Question 4h2 Additional Remarks -  
  
<pre>
+
 
 
"(Not Answered)"  
 
"(Not Answered)"  
</pre>
+
 
  
 
Question 5 Confirm Participation - where,  
 
Question 5 Confirm Participation - where,  
  
<pre>
+
 
 
a 'convener' is a participant who provides substantive contribution to the [[OntologySummit2007]]  
 
a 'convener' is a participant who provides substantive contribution to the [[OntologySummit2007]]  
 
initiative (through the online discourse, this survey, and other events leading to or during  
 
initiative (through the online discourse, this survey, and other events leading to or during  
 
the workshops and the written communique process), and  
 
the workshops and the written communique process), and  
</pre>
 
  
<pre>
+
 
 +
 
 
a 'co-sponsor' is an organization who is providing technical or funding support (e.g. supporting  
 
a 'co-sponsor' is an organization who is providing technical or funding support (e.g. supporting  
 
member(s) of its technical staff to participate as a 'convener'), and/or endorsing the objective  
 
member(s) of its technical staff to participate as a 'convener'), and/or endorsing the objective  
 
of this [[OntologySummit2007]],  
 
of this [[OntologySummit2007]],  
</pre>
 
  
<pre>
+
 
 +
 
 
[  ]  I agree that my name can be listed as a 'convener' of [[OntologySummit2007]]
 
[  ]  I agree that my name can be listed as a 'convener' of [[OntologySummit2007]]
 
[  ]  I will consider endorsing the [[OntologySummit2007]] communique. Please send it to me for  
 
[  ]  I will consider endorsing the [[OntologySummit2007]] communique. Please send it to me for  
Line 344: Line 344:
 
[  ]  I confirm that you may list my organization as a 'co-sponsor' for  
 
[  ]  I confirm that you may list my organization as a 'co-sponsor' for  
 
[[OntologySummit2007]] (details below).  
 
[[OntologySummit2007]] (details below).  
</pre>
+
 
  
 
Question 5a Co-Sponsor confirmation:  
 
Question 5a Co-Sponsor confirmation:  
  
<pre>
+
 
 
Organization Name:  (Not Answered)
 
Organization Name:  (Not Answered)
 
Link (url) to Logo:  (Not Answered)  
 
Link (url) to Logo:  (Not Answered)  
</pre>
 
  
----
 
  
<pre>
+
----
 
+
</pre>
+
 
+
<pre>
+
 
+
</pre>
+

Revision as of 01:17, 26 April 2013

[ ]

Please make sure you refer to the OntologySummit2007 & OntologySummit2007_Survey pages for the full context of the input.        (1A1)


Question 1 Respondant Info     (1A2)


Name: Francis mccabe     (1A3)


Question 2 Affiliated - I am affiliated with the following constituencies/communities (please check all that apply)     (1A4)


[ ] Formal ontology communities [X] Semantic Web communities [ ] Linguistic communities [ ] Concept Map community [ ] Topic Map community [ ] SEARCH communities [ ] Web 2.0 communities [ ] Thesauri community [ ] Taxonomy communities [ ] Metadata communities [ ] XML communities [X] Applications Development, Software Engineering and Information Model communities [X] System Architecture communities [ ] Biomedical communities [X] Standards Development communities [ ] Other (please specify): (Not Answered)     (1A5)


Question 2a Representing - I represent the perspective of the following constituency/community (please pick one; if you want to provide input from more than one perspective, please return a separate form):     (1A6)


[ ] 1. Formal ontology communities [ ] 2. Semantic Web communities [ ] 3. Linguistic communities [ ] 4. Concept Map community [ ] 5. Topic Map community [ ] 6. SEARCH communities [ ] 7. Web 2.0 communities [ ] 8. Thesauri community [ ] 9. Taxonomy communities [ ] 10. Metadata communities [ ] 11. XML communities [X] 12. Applications Development, Software Engineering and Information Model communities [ ] 13. System Architecture communities [ ] 14. Biomedical communities [ ] 15. Standards Development communities [ ] 16. Other (please specify): (Not Answered)     (1A7)


Question 2b Specific Community     (1A8)


or sub-community I am affiliated with: (Not Answered)     (1A9)


Question 2c Expertise Self Assessment - With respect to the perspective you are representing and providing input from, I am a/an:     (1A10)


[ ] 1. informed layman [ ] 2. practitioner [X] 3. expert [ ] 4. other (please specify): (Not Answered)     (1A11)


Question 3a Ontology Value -     (1A12)


"Ontology engineering is a better level of abstraction for dealing with issues than Java or XML"     (1A13)


Question 3b Ontology Issues -     (1A14)


"The hardest balance is that between language expressivity and computational requirements"     (1A15)


Question 3c Ontology Problems -     (1A16)


"negation, scoping"     (1A17)


Question 3d Corresponding Solutions -     (1A18)


"I dread to think, given the amount of ink spilled on negation over the years"     (1A19)


Question 4aGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:     (1A20)


Term: (Not Answered) Gloss: (Not Answered) Reference (citation/url): (Not Answered) Artifact (name/version): (Not Answered) - Artifact Ref. (url): (Not Answered)     (1A21)


Question 4a1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?     (1A22)


[ ] 1. 1 - totally unlikely [ ] 2. 2 - rarely [ ] 3. 3 - sometimes [ ] 4. 4 - quite often [ ] 5. 5 - almost always     (1A23)


Question 4a2 Additional Remarks -     (1A24)


"This looks like a b---s--- question. We could spend from now until the end of the universe debating what an onotlogy is?"     (1A25)


Question 4bGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:     (1A26)


Term: (Not Answered) Gloss: (Not Answered) Reference (citation/url): (Not Answered) Artifact (name/version): (Not Answered) - Artifact Ref. (url): (Not Answered)     (1A27)


Question 4b1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?     (1A28)


[ ] 1. 1 - totally unlikely [ ] 2. 2 - rarely [ ] 3. 3 - sometimes [ ] 4. 4 - quite often [ ] 5. 5 - almost always     (1A29)


Question 4b2 Additional Remarks -     (1A30)


"(Not Answered)"     (1A31)


Question 4cGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:     (1A32)


Term: (Not Answered) Gloss: (Not Answered) Reference (citation/url): (Not Answered) Artifact (name/version): (Not Answered) - Artifact Ref. (url): (Not Answered)     (1A33)


Question 4c1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?     (1A34)


[ ] 1. 1 - totally unlikely [ ] 2. 2 - rarely [ ] 3. 3 - sometimes [ ] 4. 4 - quite often [ ] 5. 5 - almost always     (1A35)


Question 4c2 Additional Remarks -     (1A36)


"(Not Answered)"     (1A37)


Question 4dGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:     (1A38)


Term: (Not Answered) Gloss: (Not Answered) Reference (citation/url): (Not Answered) Artifact (name/version): (Not Answered) - Artifact Ref. (url): (Not Answered)     (1A39)


Question 4d1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?     (1A40)


[ ] 1. 1 - totally unlikely [ ] 2. 2 - rarely [ ] 3. 3 - sometimes [ ] 4. 4 - quite often [ ] 5. 5 - almost always     (1A41)


Question 4d2 Additional Remarks -     (1A42)


"(Not Answered)"     (1A43)


Question 4eGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:     (1A44)


Term: (Not Answered) Gloss: (Not Answered) Reference (citation/url): (Not Answered) Artifact (name/version): (Not Answered) - Artifact Ref. (url): (Not Answered)     (1A45)


Question 4e1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?     (1A46)


[ ] 1. 1 - totally unlikely [ ] 2. 2 - rarely [ ] 3. 3 - sometimes [ ] 4. 4 - quite often [ ] 5. 5 - almost always     (1A47)


Question 4e2 Additional Remarks -     (1A48)


"(Not Answered)"     (1A49)


Question 4fGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:     (1A50)


Term: (Not Answered) Gloss: (Not Answered) Reference (citation/url): (Not Answered) Artifact (name/version): (Not Answered) - Artifact Ref. (url): (Not Answered)     (1A51)


Question 4f1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?     (1A52)


[ ] 1. 1 - totally unlikely [ ] 2. 2 - rarely [ ] 3. 3 - sometimes [ ] 4. 4 - quite often [ ] 5. 5 - almost always     (1A53)


Question 4f2 Additional Remarks -     (1A54)


"(Not Answered)"     (1A55)


Question 4gGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:     (1A56)


Term: (Not Answered) Gloss (definition): (Not Answered) Reference (citation/url): (Not Answered) Artifact (name/version): (Not Answered) - Artifact Ref. (url): (Not Answered)     (1A57)


Question 4g1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?     (1A58)


[ ] 1. 1 - totally unlikely [ ] 2. 2 - rarely [ ] 3. 3 - sometimes [ ] 4. 4 - quite often [ ] 5. 5 - almost always     (1A59)


Question 4g2 Additional Remarks -     (1A60)


"(Not Answered)"     (1A61)


Question 4hGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:     (1A62)


Term: (Not Answered) Gloss: (Not Answered) Reference (citation/url): (Not Answered) Artifact (name/version): (Not Answered) - Artifact Ref. (url): (Not Answered)     (1A63)


Question 4h1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?     (1A64)


[ ] 1. 1 - totally unlikely [ ] 2. 2 - rarely [ ] 3. 3 - sometimes [ ] 4. 4 - quite often [ ] 5. 5 - almost always     (1A65)


Question 4h2 Additional Remarks -     (1A66)


"(Not Answered)"     (1A67)


Question 5 Confirm Participation - where,     (1A68)


a 'convener' is a participant who provides substantive contribution to the OntologySummit2007 initiative (through the online discourse, this survey, and other events leading to or during the workshops and the written communique process), and     (1A69)


a 'co-sponsor' is an organization who is providing technical or funding support (e.g. supporting member(s) of its technical staff to participate as a 'convener'), and/or endorsing the objective of this OntologySummit2007,     (1A70)


[ ] I agree that my name can be listed as a 'convener' of OntologySummit2007 [ ] I will consider endorsing the OntologySummit2007 communique. Please send it to me for review when it is ready. I will confirm my endorsement after the review. [ ] I confirm that you may list my organization as a 'co-sponsor' for OntologySummit2007 (details below).     (1A71)


Question 5a Co-Sponsor confirmation:     (1A72)


Organization Name: (Not Answered) Link (url) to Logo: (Not Answered)     (1A73)



Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox
Share