From OntologPSMW

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Last updated at: 2007-07-13 15:27:42 By user: PeterYim)
(combined Panel-1 slide (release candidate) posted Last updated at: 2007-07-16 13:24:30 By user: PeterYim)
Line 65: Line 65:
  
 
* Agenda: (draft - as at 2007.07.13-15:20 PDT)  
 
* Agenda: (draft - as at 2007.07.13-15:20 PDT)  
* '''Panel-1: Lessons Learned from Virtual Organizing for the [[OntologySummit2007]]''' - Tue 17-Jul-2007 11:25am~12:30pm - total: 65 minutes  
+
* '''Panel-1: Lessons Learned from Virtual Organizing for the [[OntologySummit2007]]''' - Tue 17-Jul-2007 11:25am~12:30pm - total: 65 minutes - '''[http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/wip/cew-63/Ontolog-Panel_OntologySummit2007-lessons-learned_20070717b.ppt slides]'''
** Opening - [[SteveRay]] & [[SteveRay]]  
+
** Opening - [[SteveRay]] & [[PeterYim]]  
 
*** [[SteveRay]]: the Initiative - our goal, process, outcome  
 
*** [[SteveRay]]: the Initiative - our goal, process, outcome  
 
*** [[PeterYim]]: the setting; organizers, sponsors and the 'broader' community  
 
*** [[PeterYim]]: the setting; organizers, sponsors and the 'broader' community  
Line 80: Line 80:
 
** Briefings -  
 
** Briefings -  
 
*** [[ElisaKendall]]: "Emerging issues in vocabulary management, ontology publication and specification management from an OMG perspective"  
 
*** [[ElisaKendall]]: "Emerging issues in vocabulary management, ontology publication and specification management from an OMG perspective"  
*** [[DeniseBedford]]: "Records Management Ontologies"
+
*** [[JoshLubell]] (NIST): Existing Archival Standards and Where Ontologies Would Benefit (Josh will be sending in his title soon)
 
*** [[FrankOlken]]: "Potential Ontology Applications for National Science Foundation Records Management"  
 
*** [[FrankOlken]]: "Potential Ontology Applications for National Science Foundation Records Management"  
*** [[JoshLubell]] & [[RachuriSudarsan]] (NIST): perspectives on non-text records  (still need a title if you will be doing a brief, or whether you will just comment from the panel round, Josh & Sudarsan)
+
*** [[DeniseBedford]]: "Records Management Ontologies"
 
*** LeoObrst: what do Ontologies and Ontological Engineering bring to the table, with a briefing entitled: "Why Ontologies Can't Help Records Management" (Yes, that what Leo wants!)  
 
*** LeoObrst: what do Ontologies and Ontological Engineering bring to the table, with a briefing entitled: "Why Ontologies Can't Help Records Management" (Yes, that what Leo wants!)  
 
** Panelists Exchange, and input from other Ontolog members at the workshop  
 
** Panelists Exchange, and input from other Ontolog members at the workshop  

Revision as of 09:22, 18 December 2012

[ ]

Contents

This is working page for the preparation of the two Ontolog Panels that we are setting on for presentation at the Collaborative Expedition Workshop #63 (July 17 & 18, 2007 at NSF, Arlington, VA, USA.)     (1A)

Background:     (1B)

SusanTurnbull featured the "community process" of this Summit on the Tue 2007.07.17 Collaborative Expedition Workshop (CEW#63 to be held at NSF, Arlington, VA, USA) as part of her exposition into the process, dynamics, potential and realities of a few of the exemplary virtual communities during that one-day workshop. T        (1B1)

Workshop Title: "Towards Stable Meaning and Records Preservation in Information-Sharing: Building the Way Forward Together"     (1B2)

Description     (1C)

As SusanTurnbull has it on her preliminary program, there will be two panels, one each on Jul-17 (Tue) & Jul-18 (Wed). Topics as described below.     (1C1)

The Team     (1D)

Content Design     (1E)

The Plan     (1F)

  • Process in general: anchors do a brief 10 minutes (15 min. max; say, 5~6 slides) to frame the issues; then go around the panel (5 min.; 1~3 slides) to bring out the salient points and get our message across; then open to the floor for Q&A and discussion     (1F1)

Resources     (1G)