Actions

Ontolog Forum

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

(US) National Health Information Network, Request for Information - Project Home Page

Work Product

The Ontolog Community's response to the ONCHIT NHIN RFI #4150-24 (updated) - see: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/health-ont/NHIN-RFI/NHIN-ontolog-rfi-response_20050118.doc

Most Critical Task(s) At Hand

  • ... (insert content here) ...

What's New

  • Our response to the NHIN-RFI was delivered Jan. 18, 2005, on time (even with 4 minutes to spare before the deadline!)
    • Kudos to all who were involved and contributed.
  • One page "thesis" that will guide our group response
  • the RFI Announcement page is at: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/rfi.html
  • a concise summary by Prof. Kroch of Dr. Brailer and other's prior work is at: http://wfs.cgu.edu/lafkyd/cgu-kroch.pdf
    • EMR Definitional elements and requirements
    • EMR Current state:
      • Implementation goals
      • Barriers
      • Opportunities
    • ONCHIT Framework for Strategic Action
      • Data Exchange (Physician, "Physician Assistants", and Clinicians)
      • CareScience Projects
    • Community data sharing
    • Santa Barbara County (example of most medical communities)
      • Core Data Exchange
  • a transcription of the Technical Assistance Call is at: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/documents/Transcript_RFI_Technical_Assistance_Call.pdf (This is a 48 page document to be summarized;)
    • key points is the needs of the Dr. Brailer Team to discover missing issues.
    • Is Ontology a "Missing Issue"?

Key Date(s) to Note

  • important DATE: Responses should be submitted via email to ( NHINRFI@hhs.gov ) the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONCHIT), on or before 5 p.m. e.s.t. on January 18, 2005.
    • Weds Dec. 22, 04 ( Agenda approved; "B" Team held ~ 5 discussion Sessions: draft answers to questions)
    • Thurs Jan 6th 2005
      • Prepare for Outline Discussion
      • Prepare to capture issues with NHIN_RFI "Ontology Life Cycle"
      • Issues described and "majority" of alignment conflicts resolved
    • Saturday, Jan 8th 2005 Editing of Outline (Bob, Nad, others) Bob Smith
    • Tue Jan 11th 2005 work session
      • Clarify Health Ontolog objectives and scope of an Ontology based Approach to Health Care Bob Smith
      • Resolve workgroup process (time-limited discussion and vote/polling (informal) )
      • Breadth of Response (Number of sections and questions)
      • Editorial process and final edit responsibility
    • Thurs Jan 13th 2005
      • Review and Comment cycles
    • Sunday, Jan 16th 3pm PST Deadline for Question Submittals
      • Merge, Synthesize, Identify alignment issues
      • Circulate for Review and Comment; Phone Calls
    • Mon Jan 17th 2005
      • Continue discussions and refinement
    • Tuesday, Jan 18th, 4pm EST eMail to Dr. Brailer

Project Mission

  • To round up a joint Ontolog community effort, to author a response and submit that to the (US) National Health Information Network, Request for Information of 2004.11.15. Using that as the beginning of a collaborative effort where the Ontolog community can contribute professionally to the NHIN initiative.

Outline for Deliverables & Deadlines

  • Strawman version 1 Bob Smith
    • The RFI states 4 goals, key missing elements to bridge current practice to a ten year vision, and poses a Decision Scenario including:
      • The NHIN could be developed and operated in many ways.
        • It could include state-of-the-art web technologies or more traditional clearinghouse architectures.
        • It could be highly decentralized or somewhat centrally brokered.
        • It could be a nationwide service, a collection of regional services or a set of tools that share common components.
        • It could be overseen by public organizations, by private organizations, or by public-private consortia.
      • Regardless of how it is developed, overseen or operated, there is a compelling public interest for a NHIN to exist.
    • The RFI has 24 questions structured into 5 parts (But no "Problem Statement" )
  • Team Organization
  • Team 1: 3 Questions;(SMI_Mark_Adam_Samson_Natasha) Overview and working definition of a National Health Information Network for distributing Electronic Health Records:
    • A. General ( Working definitions of a National Health Information Network, models of access to this Network, and appropriate roles at each level)
  • Team 2: 10 Questions;( Kurt_Bo_Bob_Nad ); Enterprise Strategy, Process, Incentive Alignments:
    • B. Organizational and Business Framework (Economic and Policy Criteria for developing Business and Organizational Models in a "Mixed Public-Private, Open interoperable Context )
    • C. Management and Operational Considerations ( Useful and Useable Products, Policy and Managerial Incentives, Contingency-Risk Modeling, Community of Practice governance )
  • Team 3: 11 Questions; ( Nicolas EdwardCherlin MarkRoest) Standards and Incentives
    • D. Standards and Policies to Achieve Interoperability ( What is the current status of the major Standards Development Organizations and their processes/assumptions and relationships to each other and the US Govt... Open Standards developed in an open process )
    • E. Financial and/or Regulatory Incentives and Legal Consideration __ Other ( Do conflicting policies and strategies now exist? Are new architectures and mechanisms available to resolve certain pivotal conflict areas? )

Project Work-in-Progress

  • Bob Smith OUTLINE Draft # 1
    • Executive Abstract-Thesis
    • Problem Statement (Embracing Ontology as a means to knowledge-enabled health care systems?)
    • (General) Core Technical Issues: Knowledge Applied to useful and useable Health Records and its Network
      • Identify key ontology questions about Health Records (Was EHR)
      • Identify key ontology questions about Health Knowledge Delivery (Was NHIN)
    • Organizational and Business Framework (NOTE: ONCHIT Leadership Panel Strategy about to be published)
      • Scope (Context, Feasible Strategies, and Time Frames)
      • Semantics of Public-Private Ontologies
      • Is Health Care Competition a major ontological problem? ( Economics of Competitive Strategy Options?)
      • Alternative Views and Policy Creation Mechanisms that work
    • Management and Operational Considerations
      • Design and Maintence
      • Is Health Care "Value Chains"
      • Need for Ontologies in FHA Projects
      • Institutional structures (GAO, for example, may add unexpected value to Ontology projects)
    • Standards and Policies for Interoperability
      • Ontology questions for Standard Setting Bodies
      • Examples of effective use of Ontologies in SSB
      • Interoperability and MetaStandards (Steve Ray citations)
    • Incentives and Legal Issues
    • Other
      • Q 23: Design Principles
    • Terms, Concepts, and Tools
      • Ontology
      • Policy
      • Ontology Policy
      • Etc.
    • Bibliography
    • need to add: conclusions and recommendations
    • Brand suggested we cite the Hardvard Study on CoP in Government.

Action Plan and Chronology

  • Bob Smith Monday 1-17-05: Post Action Report Format designed for next Opportunity
  • Bob Smith Sunday 1-16-05: Note that many of the 24 RFI questions are now "answered" by ONCHIT Staff in their five presentations to key stakeholders "Suggestive Answers?"
    • Extensions of the earlier "Framework" of 4 goals and strategies to achieving these defined goals
    • Specific project thrusts with start and finish points
    • Increased specification of concepts: Regional solutions; Public-Private Partnerships; CHI-eGov Architectures;
  • Bob Smith Tuesday, 1-11-05: What is our primary objective?
    • Convincing Dr. Brailer to use an Ontology Approach to evaluate technical and non-technical NHIN-EHR design choices
      • HL7 and ICD 9 "improvements"
      • A Protege based solution set
    • Convincing Dr. Brailer of the links between Interoperability, Enterprise Architecture, and Ontology
  • Resolve Option 1 -- Option 2 language
    • Mark and Adam create a 1 page "thesis" and use it to guide the group response
  • Achieve sufficient Membership interest in completing this RFI phase and future opportunities
  • To consider the alignment tasks between the three major sections in light of calendar realities
    • 1. Focus on just the "ontology" used by the RFI writing team of Dr. Brailer (Agree)
    • 2. Develop a "Strawman" of working definitions of the two central terms (NHIN and _EHR)
    • 3. Expand, in parallel, the Enterprise Topics and the Regulatory Topics
    • 4. Assess the internal alignments within each of the three topics
    • 5. Integrate, as needed, alignment problems within and between the three topics
    • 6. Reality Checks
    • 7. Complete the resulting document and essential graphics ( 1-3 pages per question?)
      • pull a response to the RFI together and submit that by the 2005.01.18 deadline.

The Team

    • ...(add names of any missing team member here)...

Discussion Archives & Shared-File Workspace

Resources

Conference Call, Meeting & Workshop

  • ...(list and link to agenda & proceedings pages here)...



Retrieved from "https://ontologforum.com/index.php?title=NhinRfi&oldid=1976"