Actions

Ontolog Forum

The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
Session Communique Editing
Duration 1 hour
Date/Time October 21 2020 16:00 GMT
9:00am PDT/12:00pm EDT
5:00pm BST/6:00pm CEST
Convener Ken Baclawski

Ontology Summit 2020 Topic:Communiqué Editing

Agenda

  • The Communiqué for the Ontology Summit 2020: Knowledge Graphs will be presented and the editing process will begin.
  • The first draft of the Communiqué is available for commenting and editing at https://bit.ly/3dJAGKd

Conference Call Information

  • Date: Wednesday, 21-October-2020
  • Start Time: 9:00am PDT / 12:00pm EDT / 6:00pm CEST / 5:00pm BST / 1600 UTC
  • Expected Call Duration: 1 hour
  • The Video Conference URL is https://bit.ly/3i1uPRl
    • iPhone one-tap :
      • +16465588656,,83077436914#,,,,,,0#,,822275# US (New York)
      • +13017158592,,83077436914#,,,,,,0#,,822275# US (Germantown)
    • Telephone:
  • Chat Room: https://bit.ly/39PzQJW
    • If the chat room is not available, then use the Zoom chat room.

Participants

Discussion

Soaphub

[11:54] DrRaviSharma: hi ken thanks for the Communique draft, just opening now

[11:56] DrRaviSharma: All- the framework whence etc should appear as Logo or small icon in Communique?

[12:06] DrRaviSharma1: we have agreed to search for similar image of tree that are not copyrighted

[12:07] David Eddy: I formally object.. image should be either mobius strip or klein bottle ... no beginning & no end. https://kleinbottle.com/

[12:08] David Eddy: "reality" folds back onto itself

[12:10] David Eddy: a granite eating fungus/lichen... excellent

[12:11] David Eddy: drop the graphic issue for today... move on

[12:11] David Eddy: logo is needed... but later

[12:12] gary: Draft at https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GSYlVebUz98WpjvUk09MZzB34Xsy9eDp/view

[12:31] KenBaclawski: KG + KGI = KGS

[12:33] DrRaviSharma: It was agreed that KG life cycle will also be distinguished in he communique

[12:33] DrRaviSharma: KGI holds content of KG as does all infrastructure - Ravi's comment

[12:36] DrRaviSharma: Ken- said KGs do not have deep schema!

[12:38] ToddSchneider: The image, Figure 1, 'Architecture of a Knowledge Graph Infrastructure from [58]', does not appear in a downloaded copy of the communique draft.

[12:38] DrRaviSharma: KGI with KG para last sentence is to be brought up.

[12:40] ToddSchneider: Should the forum posts about the definition about the definition of a knowledge graph be made available (as a collection, time ordered) on the communique web site?

[12:42] russell reinsch: Using KGs independent of reasoning: better integration, and the associated provenance, change semantics, and things for governance are included in the graph,

[12:42] russell reinsch: as opposed to being located outside of an rdbms

[12:43] russell reinsch: provenance elements are part of the graph, not located elsewhere

[12:43] russell reinsch: New data introduced with less effort.

[12:44] russell reinsch: Handful of reasons why using them without reasoning or inference

[12:46] DrRaviSharma: Ken - what about Category theiries and situational techniques for KG?

[12:49] DrRaviSharma: we will add Financial- thanks

[12:55] ToddSchneider: Add qualifying sentence to 'Challenges' table to indicate that there is more each of the items listed in 'Problem/Issue' column.

[12:57] DrRaviSharma: we found financial in standards

[12:58] DrRaviSharma: Ram said we can say something about framework in the introduction as background....

[12:58] DrRaviSharma: Gary - great insights especially in Problems and issues areas?

[12:59] DrRaviSharma: Ontologies were not explicitly useful during summit even though their importance was recognized by everyone!

[12:59] DrRaviSharma: Gary mentioned parallel with Data ware houses

[13:00] ToddSchneider: "Lack of use of an ontology as the basis for a knowledge graph limits their usefulness, effectiveness and extensibility."

[13:01] ToddSchneider: Slight modification: "Lack of use of a well crafted ontology as the basis for a knowledge graph limits their usefulness, effectiveness and extensibility."

[13:05] DrRaviSharma: Gary sorry typo

[13:05] DrRaviSharma: next week final draft

[13:10] DrRaviSharma: attempting to copy from zoom chat

Zoom

[12:08] RussellReinsch : more than one type of graph

[12:08] RussellReinsch : hierarchic type

[12:08] RussellReinsch : everything connected type

[12:09] Ram Sriram : Thanks Russell

[12:10] RussellReinsch : I would like to submit two ideas as substitutes for the tree diagram

[12:10] RussellReinsch : that I can draft for the group to view

[12:13] RussellReinsch : I can read it too

[12:17] RussellReinsch : accessible for users

[12:18] Alex Shkotin : Russell, try https://groups.google.com/g/ontolog-forum

[12:20] RussellReinsch : Thanks A;ex

[12:26] RussellReinsch : because we don't have full access yet

[12:28] RussellReinsch : It was a pipeline but there was something about it that

[12:28] RussellReinsch : was problematic for me

[12:28] Alex Shkotin : Russell, it's better to use http://webconf.soaphub.org/conf/room/ontology_summit_2021

[12:29] Alex Shkotin : you are there :-)

[12:33] RussellReinsch : @ Alex - OK

[12:35] Alex Shkotin : but we have "If the chat room is not available, then use the Zoom chat room." :-)

[12:55] Brand Niemann : Thanks for letting me join. I will check back periodically.

[13:09] Ravi Sharma : Alex, yes it is better to post here rather than loose the thought.

[13:09] Alex Shkotin : :-)

Resources

Previous Meetings

... further results

Next Meetings