https://ontologforum.com/index.php?title=Blog_talk:Multi-context_systems_engineering/2018-04-18_The_Possibility_of_a_Shared_Ontology/c000015&feed=atom&action=historyBlog talk:Multi-context systems engineering/2018-04-18 The Possibility of a Shared Ontology/c000015 - Revision history2024-03-29T05:49:42ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.39.0https://ontologforum.com/index.php?title=Blog_talk:Multi-context_systems_engineering/2018-04-18_The_Possibility_of_a_Shared_Ontology/c000015&diff=3628&oldid=previmported>JanetSinger: New comment by JanetSinger: Gary – Good elaboration of what could seen as the ‘canonical issues of ontology development’ for real (evolving, complex, heterogeneous, etc.) systems: 1) There are alwa...2018-04-18T16:30:11Z<p>New comment by JanetSinger: Gary – Good elaboration of what could seen as the ‘canonical issues of ontology development’ for real (evolving, complex, heterogeneous, etc.) systems: 1) There are alwa...</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>Gary – Good elaboration of what could seen as the ‘canonical issues of ontology development’ for real (evolving, complex, heterogeneous, etc.) systems:<br />
<br />
1) There are always limits on how much model standardization is feasible and desirable;<br />
2) In hindsight, significant failures can often be traced to lack of standardization in areas where it would have been feasible and desirable;<br />
3) How do you know in advance where those areas will be?<br />
<br />
Jack and I have been hoping that this would take shape as an important focus for the context of ontology development and use. Your thoughts on how to proceed are helpful.<br />
{{wl-comment: }}</div>imported>JanetSinger