https://ontologforum.com/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=OntologySummit2012_Applications_CommunityInput 2026-07-28T19:15:25Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.39.0 https://ontologforum.com/index.php?title=OntologySummit2012_Applications_CommunityInput&diff=232&oldid=prev 2016-01-09T08:18:44Z

<p>Fix PurpleMediaWiki references</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>= [[OntologySummit2012|Ontology Summit 2012]]: (Track-4) &quot;Large-scale domain applications&quot; Community Input =<br /> <br /> Track Co-Champions: Dr. [[SteveRay|Steve Ray]] and Dr. [[TrishWhetzel|Trish Whetzel]] <br /> <br /> == Mission Statement ==<br /> <br /> '''This track will help to ground the discussions in the other tracks and bring key challenges to light by describing current large-scale systems and systems of systems that either use, or could use, ontologies in their deployment. &quot;Large-scale&quot; can mean either very large data sets, very complex data sets, federated systems, highly distributed systems, or real-time, continuous data systems. Examples of large data sets might include scientific observations and studies; complex data sets could be technical data packages for manufactured products, or electronic health records; federated systems could include information sharing to combat terrorism, highly distributed systems includes items such as the smart electrical grid (aka Smart Grid), and real-time systems include network management systems. Of course, some big systems might include all five aspects. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;''' <br /> <br /> see also: [[OntologySummit2012_Applications_Synthesis]] <br /> <br /> ----<br /> <br /> '''Enter your input below''' ... ''(please identify yourself and date your entry)'' <br /> <br /> Entry by [[SteveRay|Steve Ray]], 2/21/2012 <br /> <br /> * Observations / Lessons learned: <br /> ** UML to OWL is a common requirement for legacy systems <br /> *** Need better tools to help interpret legacy systems, transform into semantic systems. <br /> *** Starting from scratch is rare. <br /> ** Ontology patterns are very helpful, and encourage model reuse <br /> ** Look for the 80-20 rule of semantic development <br /> ** Semantic techniques work best when not compromised by implementation tradeoffs <br /> ** Semantic methods are faster to implement and easier to maintain <br /> ** Semantic approaches are particularly suited to systems with many complex constraints, rules, laws, with frequent changes <br /> <br /> * Needs: <br /> ** Need better standards for common elements: <br /> *** Datatypes (Are xsd types enough? I think not) <br /> *** Ontology patterns (e.g. whole/part patterns) <br /> *** Collect ontological primitives from observation data <br /> ** Need repositories (When is OOR going to be ready for production use?) <br /> *** Repositories of ontological patterns could be more useful than repositories of ontologies <br /> ** Need industrial strength semantic services resident in the cloud <br /> ** Need better visualization tools and approaches <br /> <br /> ----<br /> <br /> * ... <br /> <br /> [[Category:WorkSpace]] [[Category:OntologySummit]] [[Category:OntologySummit2012]]<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> </div>

imported>KennethBaclawski