imported>KennethBaclawski: Fix PurpleMediaWiki references

2016-01-09T07:57:18Z

Fix PurpleMediaWiki references

New page

= [[OntologySummit2007|Ontology Summit 2007]]: [[OntologySummit2007_Survey]] individual responses =

== [[OntologySummit2007_Survey/Response]] input from [[CarlMattocks|Carl Mattocks]] ==

'''''Please make sure you refer to the [[OntologySummit2007|Ontology Summit 2007]] & [[OntologySummit2007_Survey]] pages for the full context of the input.   '''''

----

Question 1 Respondant Info

Name: carl mattocks

Question 2 Affiliated -
I am affiliated with the following constituencies/communities (please check all that apply)

[X] Formal ontology communities

[X] Semantic Web communities

[ ] Linguistic communities

[ ] Concept Map community

[ ] Topic Map community

[ ] SEARCH communities

[ ] Web 2.0 communities

[X] Thesauri community

[ ] Taxonomy communities

[X] Metadata communities

[X] XML communities

[X] Applications Development, Software Engineering and Information Model communities

[X] System Architecture communities

[ ] Biomedical communities

[X] Standards Development communities

[ ] Other (please specify): (Not Answered)

Question 2a Representing -
I represent the perspective of the following constituency/community (please pick one; if you want to provide input from more than one perspective, please return a separate form):

[ ] 1. Formal ontology communities

[ ] 2. Semantic Web communities

[ ] 3. Linguistic communities

[ ] 4. Concept Map community

[ ] 5. Topic Map community

[ ] 6. SEARCH communities

[ ] 7. Web 2.0 communities

[ ] 8. Thesauri community

[ ] 9. Taxonomy communities

[ ] 10. Metadata communities

[ ] 11. XML communities

[ ] 12. Applications Development, Software Engineering and Information Model communities

[ ] 13. System Architecture communities

[ ] 14. Biomedical communities

[X] 15. Standards Development communities

[ ] 16. Other (please specify): (Not Answered)

Question 2b Specific Community

or sub-community I am affiliated with: OASIS TC BCM & Registry / Repository

Question 2c Expertise Self Assessment -
With respect to the perspective you are representing and providing input from, I am a/an:

[ ] 1. informed layman

[ ] 2. practitioner

[X] 3. expert

[ ] 4. other (please specify): (Not Answered)

Question 3a Ontology Value -

"OWL Provides an active classification system for XML artifacts"

Question 3b Ontology Issues -

"Education - fellow practitioners want to understand how it relates

to their work on system architecture / business framework that

includes internet enabled services"

Question 3c Ontology Problems -

"Problem is one of too many choices. Beginners have to choose between various standards

e.g flavours of WC3 OWL, SKOS, ISO Common Logic, OMG Ontology Models"

Question 3d Corresponding Solutions -

"If the authors of different Ontology-centric standards cannot differentiate

between themselves (in simple language) then a reputable institution (NIST ?)

should publish a guideline that helps potential users make an informed choice

about what is appropriate for intended use"

Question 4aGlossary -
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:

Term: RegistryObject

Gloss: is an abstract base class used by most classes in the model.

It provides minimal metadata for registry objects

Reference (citation/url): ebXML Registry Profile for Web Ontology

Artifact (name/version): Version 1.0

- Artifact Ref. (url): http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/19037/regrep-owl-profile-1.5-July4.pdf

Question 4a1 Called An Ontology -
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?

[ ] 1. 1 - totally unlikely

[X] 2. 2 - rarely

[ ] 3. 3 - sometimes

[ ] 4. 4 - quite often

[ ] 5. 5 - almost always

Question 4a2 Additional Remarks -

"The Specialized Object definition is part of an institutionally managed

open source specification that has a very specific context. Use of the

'contextual prefix method' to state the specialization of a very generic

term is essential to convey some meaning."

Question 4bGlossary -
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:

Term: Model

Gloss: A set of inter-related documents that describe an IT service

or system. Each model consists of two disjoint subsets of

documents genic documents and phenic documents.

Reference (citation/url): Service Modeling Language

Artifact (name/version): Version 0.5, 25 July 2006

- Artifact Ref. (url): http://www.serviceml.org/

Question 4b1 Called An Ontology -
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?

[ ] 1. 1 - totally unlikely

[X] 2. 2 - rarely

[ ] 3. 3 - sometimes

[ ] 4. 4 - quite often

[ ] 5. 5 - almost always

Question 4b2 Additional Remarks -

"Term is found in the Terminology section of the public specification.

Term is widely used by the target community (system architects) to

describe other things."

Question 4cGlossary -
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:

Term: WSML-DL

Gloss: This language is an extension of WSML-Core which fully captures

the Description Logic SHIQ(D), which captures a major part of

the (DL species of the) Web Ontology Language OWL [OWL], with

a datatype extension based on OWL-E [Pan and Horrocks, 2004], wh...

Reference (citation/url): Web Service Modeling Language (WSML)

Artifact (name/version): W3C Member Submission 3 June 2005

- Artifact Ref. (url): http://www.w3.org/Submission/WSML/

Question 4c1 Called An Ontology -
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?

[ ] 1. 1 - totally unlikely

[ ] 2. 2 - rarely

[X] 3. 3 - sometimes

[ ] 4. 4 - quite often

[ ] 5. 5 - almost always

Question 4c2 Additional Remarks -

"Term is an invention of the public specification (subject matter is

clearly ontological). Essentially is a compound term that requires

full understanding of each component term. The use of the "dash" seems

to break rules for making ontological statements."

Question 4dGlossary -
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:

Term: Plan and Organize

Gloss: The Planning and Organization domain covers the use of

information & technology and how best it can be used in

a company to help achieve the company's goals and objectives

Reference (citation/url): COBIT

Artifact (name/version): (Not Answered)

- Artifact Ref. (url): http://www.isaca.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Members_and_Leaders/COBIT6/Obtain_COBIT/CobiT4.1_Brochure.pdf

Question 4d1 Called An Ontology -
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?

[X] 1. 1 - totally unlikely

[ ] 2. 2 - rarely

[ ] 3. 3 - sometimes

[ ] 4. 4 - quite often

[ ] 5. 5 - almost always

Question 4d2 Additional Remarks -

"Term is a high level descriptor of multiple acts. It is one key concept

of a "best practice" set. However using the emebedded "and" seems to

break the rules-of-thumb as to what can be a formal ontological assertion."

Question 4eGlossary -
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:

Term: (Not Answered)

Gloss: (Not Answered)

Reference (citation/url): (Not Answered)

Artifact (name/version): (Not Answered)

- Artifact Ref. (url): (Not Answered)

Question 4e1 Called An Ontology -
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?

[ ] 1. 1 - totally unlikely

[ ] 2. 2 - rarely

[ ] 3. 3 - sometimes

[ ] 4. 4 - quite often

[ ] 5. 5 - almost always

Question 4e2 Additional Remarks -

"(Not Answered)"

Question 4fGlossary -
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:

Term: (Not Answered)

Gloss: (Not Answered)

Reference (citation/url): (Not Answered)

Artifact (name/version): (Not Answered)

- Artifact Ref. (url): (Not Answered)

Question 4f1 Called An Ontology -
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?

[ ] 1. 1 - totally unlikely

[ ] 2. 2 - rarely

[ ] 3. 3 - sometimes

[ ] 4. 4 - quite often

[ ] 5. 5 - almost always

Question 4f2 Additional Remarks -

"(Not Answered)"

Question 4gGlossary -
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:

Term: (Not Answered)

Gloss (definition): (Not Answered)

Reference (citation/url): (Not Answered)

Artifact (name/version): (Not Answered)

- Artifact Ref. (url): (Not Answered)

Question 4g1 Called An Ontology -
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?

[ ] 1. 1 - totally unlikely

[ ] 2. 2 - rarely

[ ] 3. 3 - sometimes

[ ] 4. 4 - quite often

[ ] 5. 5 - almost always

Question 4g2 Additional Remarks -

"(Not Answered)"

Question 4hGlossary -
Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:

Term: (Not Answered)

Gloss: (Not Answered)

Reference (citation/url): (Not Answered)

Artifact (name/version): (Not Answered)

- Artifact Ref. (url): (Not Answered)

Question 4h1 Called An Ontology -
On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?

[ ] 1. 1 - totally unlikely

[ ] 2. 2 - rarely

[ ] 3. 3 - sometimes

[ ] 4. 4 - quite often

[ ] 5. 5 - almost always

Question 4h2 Additional Remarks -

"(Not Answered)"

Question 5 Confirm Participation - where,

a 'convener' is a participant who provides substantive contribution to the [[OntologySummit2007|Ontology Summit 2007]]

initiative (through the online discourse, this survey, and other events leading to or during

the workshops and the written communique process), and

a 'co-sponsor' is an organization who is providing technical or funding support (e.g. supporting

member(s) of its technical staff to participate as a 'convener'), and/or endorsing the objective

of this [[OntologySummit2007|Ontology Summit 2007]],

[ ] I agree that my name can be listed as a 'convener' of [[OntologySummit2007|Ontology Summit 2007]]

[ ] I will consider endorsing the [[OntologySummit2007|Ontology Summit 2007]] communique. Please send it to me for

review when it is ready. I will confirm my endorsement after the review.

[ ] I confirm that you may list my organization as a 'co-sponsor' for

[[OntologySummit2007|Ontology Summit 2007]] (details below).

Question 5a Co-Sponsor confirmation:

Organization Name: (Not Answered)

Link (url) to Logo: (Not Answered)

----

[[Category:WorkSpace]] [[Category:OntologySummit]] [[Category:OntologySummit2007]]

OntologySummit2007 Survey/CarlMattocks - Revision history

imported>KennethBaclawski: Fix PurpleMediaWiki references