imported>KennethBaclawski: Fix PurpleMediaWiki references

2016-01-09T07:55:48Z

Fix PurpleMediaWiki references

New page

= [[OntologySummit2007|Ontology Summit 2007]]: [[OntologySummit2007_Process]] proposal-1 (draft) =

First proposed: [[PeterYim|Peter P. Yim]] / 2007.02.14

== A 5-Step Process ==

* '''Convener Grouping:''' Summit participants ("conveners") are dispersed into 'teams' (constituencies[http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2007_Process/Draft1#nidU6C [1]]), each representing major communities within the broader ontology community space
** we can use a survey[http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2007_Process/Draft1#nidU6D [2]] to help identify which team an individual participant is affiliated with
** an analysis of the survey results can also provide clues as to whether we have balanced representation in different constituencies, and if not, remedial 'recruitment' actions may be taken
** a participant can choose to be in more than one team
** each team is encourage to elect a champion to help coordinate and track progress (this is optional, though)

* '''Understanding the Community Vocabulary:''' Each constituency will:
** identify the context (vantage point) from which their inputs are derived; there may be needs to create further subdivisions. (For example: if "Biomedical informatics practitioners" is one such constituency, and it turns out that that the "bio-informaticists" and the medical-informaticists" don't share the same vocabularies, then they may want to subdivide and collect inputs for each of these sub-teams.
** (each team) or each sub-team will come up with the gloss for what do they mean when they use the term "ontology"
** identify other ontology-related terms that is in their constituency's common vocabulary,
*** and come up with the gloss for each of these terms
*** also assess the Likelihood that someone may refer to each of these terms as "ontology"
**** ( 0 = totally unlikely; 5 = some would; 9 = almost always )
** identify conspicuous ontology (or ontology-like) artifacts[http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2007_Process/Draft1#nidU6E [3]] within their constituency
** the above is discovered through dialog over the [ontology-summit] discussion forum, aided (where necessary) by the survey[http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2007_Process/Draft1#nidU6D [2]] and continuously summarized and synthesized and posted to the wiki to keep all participants in sync.
** each constituency will complete and vet their glossary and list of ontology (or ontology-like) artifacts

* '''Constructing a categorization / typology framework'''[http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2007_Process/Draft1#nidU6J [4]]
** this is done between all coneveners
** and done in parallel with the virtual discourse described in 2. above

* '''Categorize'''
** place terms and artifacts into the above categorization framework (by each constituency)
** reach shared understanding on typology

* '''Authoring the Communique'''
** draft
** review, modify, enhance
** adopt (with list of endorsers)
** release / publish

== Resource & References ==

[1] different constituencies - see under [[OntologySummit2007_DefinitionsOfOntology|here]]

[2] survey - sample of a completed survey that may augment the above process - see: [http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2007_Process/Draft1#nidU6O draft survey]

[3] ontology (or ontology-like) artifacts for each constituency - see [ http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2007_Process/Draft1#nidU6N sample below]

* CYC, [[SUMO]], [[DOLCE]], [[PSL]], BFO, GUM, ISO-15926
* [[HL7]]-RIM, [[SnoMed|SNOMED CT]], GO, [[BioPAX]] Level 2 Ontology, ...

*
** we need both name and version (as different versions of the artifact with the same name may be placed differently in the categorization framework, and hence their typology may differ

[4] categorization / typology framework - see: [[OntologySummit2007_FrameworksForConsideration]]

----

== Survey questions (Draft-1) ==

1. Respondent information - (name, organization, e-mail, phone)

2a. Constituency affiliation

[ ] Formal ontologists community

[ ] Semantic Web communities

[ ] Concept Map community

[ ] Topic Map community

[ ] SEARCH communities

[ ] Web 2.0 community

[ ] Thesauri community

[ ] Taxonomists community

[ ] Metadata communities

[ ] XML community

[ ] Applications Development community

[ ] System Architecture Communities

[ ] Biomedical communities

2b. Expertise self-assessment

* 1 = informed layman
* 2 = practitioner
* 3 = expert

3a. Remarks (sub-community identification; vantage point; other comments)

3b. Ontology-related Vocabulary from your community

* Term
* Gloss
* Source Reference - (cite papers etc.; URL; point to section/paragrpah if possible)
* Representative Artifact - (Name, version)
* Likelihood that some may refer to this as "ontology"
** (enter a number from 0~9: where, 0 = totally unlikely; 5 = some would; 9 = almost always )
* Comments

(repeat, say, 8 times, allowing multiple item entries on the form)

Remarks: if a participant chooses to be in more than one team (represented in more than one constituency), he/she will complete and return more than one survey.

=== See a prototype of this form at: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/wip/summit71.html ===

== Sample of a completed survey (on the prototype form) - (Draft-1) ==

http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/wip/summit71-test02.gif

[[Category:WorkSpace]] [[Category:OntologySummit]] [[Category:OntologySummit2007]]

OntologySummit2007 Process/Draft1 - Revision history

imported>KennethBaclawski: Fix PurpleMediaWiki references