From OntologPSMW

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Ontology Summit Topic Suggestions)
(Ontology Summit Topic Suggestions)
Line 38: Line 38:
 
** Unfortunately, much of this activity is proprietary with no real standards
 
** Unfortunately, much of this activity is proprietary with no real standards
 
** The Google Knowledge Graph has been criticized for the lack of provenance
 
** The Google Knowledge Graph has been criticized for the lack of provenance
** Champion (during planning sessions): [[GaryBergCross|Gary Berg-Cross]] (to be confirmed)
+
** Champion (during planning sessions): [[GaryBergCross|Gary Berg-Cross]]
 
* Ontologies and standards (revisiting Ontology Summit 2009)
 
* Ontologies and standards (revisiting Ontology Summit 2009)
 
** Rationales for ontology based standards
 
** Rationales for ontology based standards

Revision as of 11:51, 10 July 2019

[ ]
    (1)
Session Topic Discussion
Duration 1 hour60 minute
3,600 second
0.0417 day
Date/Time July 10 2019 16:00 GMT
9:00am PDT/12:00pm EDT
5:00pm BST/6:00pm CEST
Convener Ken Baclawski

Contents

Agenda     (2A)

This meeting will be recorded. The following agenda items may require multiple meetings.     (2A1)

  1. Discussion of the three topic areas     (2A2)
    1. Ontologies and standards Mike Bennett     (2A2B)
    2. Analogy and Metaphor David Whitten (to be confirmed)     (2A2C)
  2. Selection of the topic area     (2A3)
  3. Choose tracks and track champions     (2A4)
  4. Draft summit mission statement     (2A5)
  5. Choose tentative summit title     (2A6)

Ontology Summit Topic Suggestions     (2B)

  • Knowledge graphs and ontologies     (2B1)
  • Ontologies and standards (revisiting Ontology Summit 2009)     (2B2)
    • Rationales for ontology based standards     (2B2A)
    • What are ontologies for standards?     (2B2B)
    • Is the focus ontologies for standards or standards for ontologies or both?     (2B2C)
    • What is the relationship between NL and standards?     (2B2D)
    • Ontological Standards: Past, Present, and Future is my preferred topic (Ram D. Sriram)     (2B2E)
    • Start by talking about the existing approches e.g. use of terminologies, disctionaries and so on, and show where that leads (show some leadership). Lead in to broader topic of geetting formal common meaning (ontology) into industry standards, formalizing the knowledge that is already there. (Mike Bennett)     (2B2F)
    • Champion (during planning sessions): Mike Bennett     (2B2G)
  • Analogy and Metaphor     (2B3)
    • "Metaphor is for most people device of the poetic imagination and the rhetorical flourish--a matter of extraordinary rather than ordinary language. Moreover, metaphor is typically viewed as characteristic of language alone, a matter of words rather than thought or action. For this reason, most people think they can get along perfectly well without metaphor. We have found,on the contrary, that metaphor is pervasive in everyday life, not just in language but in thought and action. Our ordinary conceptual system, in terms of which we both think and act, is fundamentally metaphorical in nature." from "Metaphors We Live By" by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson 1980     (2B3A)
    • "One of the main contentions of this book is that the cognitive mechanisms involved in metaphor may prove to be a better paradigm for structuring knowledge that that of first-order logic." from the Preface to "Knowledge Representation and Metaphor" by Eileen Cornell Way 1991     (2B3B)
    • "Analogy, metaphor, representation and user interface have much in common: each involves signs, meaning, one or more people, and some context ..." "An introduction to algebraic semiotics, with application to user interface design" by Joseph Goguen 1999     (2B3C)
    • Champion (during planning sessions): David Whitten     (2B3D)

Conference Call Information     (2C)

Participants     (2D)

Proceedings     (2E)

Previous Meetings     (2F)


Next Meetings     (2G)