From OntologPSMW

Revision as of 22:45, 26 March 2019 by KennethBaclawski (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
[ ]
    (1)
Session Finance
Duration 1 hour60 minute
3,600 second
0.0417 day
Date/Time Mar 20 2019 16:00 GMT
9:00am PST/12:00pm EST
4:00pm GMT/5:00pm CET
Convener Mike Bennett and Mark Underwood

Contents

Ontology Summit 2019 Financial Explanation Session 2     (2)

Agenda     (2A)

As a result of unexpected circumstances, the session co-chairs will not be available to run the meeting today, although they might be able to join briefly at some point. As a result, we will have a general discussion which could include topics outside the summit theme. Some potential topics:     (2A1)

Conference Call Information     (2B)

Attendees     (2C)

Proceedings     (2D)

[11:59] Ken Baclawski: As a result of unexpected circumstances, the session co-chairs will not be available to run the meeting today, although they might be able to join briefly at some point. As a result, we will have a general discussion which could include topics outside the summit theme. Some potential topics:     (2D1)

[12:06] ToddSchneider: David,     (2D5)

[12:06] ToddSchneider: David, what is a 'structure'?     (2D6)

[12:07] ToddSchneider: Is a 'structure' a continuant?     (2D7)

[12:12] ToddSchneider: Ken: In mathematics 'structure' is captured via the notion of 'category'.     (2D8)

[12:25] Ram D. Sriram: This might be of interest to you: https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2019/nsf19050/nsf19050.jsp     (2D9)

[12:52] Ram D. Sriram: Suggested a special issue for the Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences     (2D11)

[12:52] Douglas R. Miles: It is about writing programs in Common Logic instead of typical computer languages     (2D12)

[12:52] Douglas R. Miles: (That wasn't quite a paper i linked to.. but putting together a talk on the subject)     (2D13)

[12:54] Gary: The 737 problem is in part dumb automation.     (2D14)

[12:58] Douglas R. Miles: Terry see above link     (2D15)

[13:00] RaviSharma: ken discussed and we agreed to carryout a doodle poll to determine if face to face summit session is desirable and get commitments from F2F participants!     (2D16)

[13:02] RaviSharma: Ram described an NSF opportunity relating to OKN and also informed that an issue can perhaps be put together for washington journal relating to ontology.     (2D17)

[13:02] Ram D. Sriram1: Logging off. Have another call to attend to.     (2D18)

[13:03] RaviSharma: discussion covered examples like need of ontology for complex situations such as Boeing 737 Max problem (Terry).     (2D19)

[13:06] RaviSharma: Doug mentioned need of more than one person and role of AI HCI etc for understanding the whole system and its error free certification     (2D20)

[13:08] ToddSchneider: Have to go.     (2D21)

[13:11] TerryLongstreth: The Washington Academy of Sciences has a peer-reviewed journal. Ram and I are members of the Board of Managers of the Academy. The quarterly Journal solicits papers on any scientific or engineering related topic. For submission info see https://www.washacadsci.org/journal/     (2D22)

[13:14] TerryLongstreth: PDDL - Planning Domain Definition Language     (2D23)

[13:15] TerryLongstreth: Can ontology(or ontologies as a class) be used to explain events after the fact?     (2D24)

[13:19] RaviSharma: Doug - what you described looked like Case Based Reasoning     (2D25)

[13:20] RaviSharma: Also newer CRM systems and both of these navigate based on inputs from info seeker as well as the help desk tiers that handle the info seeker!     (2D26)

[13:21] RaviSharma: Terry and Ram thanks for clarification     (2D27)

[13:22] RaviSharma: on journal     (2D28)

Resources     (2E)

Previous Meetings     (2F)


Next Meetings     (2G)