OntologySummit2007 Survey/MichaelGruninger

From OntologPSMW
Jump to: navigation, search
[ ]

Please make sure you refer to the Ontology Summit 2007 & OntologySummit2007_Survey pages for the full context of the input.        (1A1)


Question 1 Respondant Info     (1A2)

Name: Michael Gruninger     (1A3)

Question 2 Affiliated - I am affiliated with the following constituencies/communities (please check all that apply)     (1A4)

[X] Formal ontology communities     (1A5)

[X] Semantic Web communities     (1A6)

[ ] Linguistic communities     (1A7)

[ ] Concept Map community     (1A8)

[ ] Topic Map community     (1A9)

[ ] SEARCH communities     (1A10)

[ ] Web 2.0 communities     (1A11)

[ ] Thesauri community     (1A12)

[ ] Taxonomy communities     (1A13)

[ ] Metadata communities     (1A14)

[ ] XML communities     (1A15)

[ ] Applications Development, Software Engineering and Information Model communities     (1A16)

[ ] System Architecture communities     (1A17)

[ ] Biomedical communities     (1A18)

[X] Standards Development communities     (1A19)

[ ] Other (please specify): (Not Answered)     (1A20)

Question 2a Representing - I represent the perspective of the following constituency/community (please pick one; if you want to provide input from more than one perspective, please return a separate form):     (1A21)

[X] 1. Formal ontology communities     (1A22)

[ ] 2. Semantic Web communities     (1A23)

[ ] 3. Linguistic communities     (1A24)

[ ] 4. Concept Map community     (1A25)

[ ] 5. Topic Map community     (1A26)

[ ] 6. SEARCH communities     (1A27)

[ ] 7. Web 2.0 communities     (1A28)

[ ] 8. Thesauri community     (1A29)

[ ] 9. Taxonomy communities     (1A30)

[ ] 10. Metadata communities     (1A31)

[ ] 11. XML communities     (1A32)

[ ] 12. Applications Development, Software Engineering and Information Model communities     (1A33)

[ ] 13. System Architecture communities     (1A34)

[ ] 14. Biomedical communities     (1A35)

[ ] 15. Standards Development communities     (1A36)

[ ] 16. Other (please specify): (Not Answered)     (1A37)

Question 2b Specific Community     (1A38)

or sub-community I am affiliated with: upper and domain ontology subcommunities     (1A39)

Question 2c Expertise Self Assessment - With respect to the perspective you are representing and providing input from, I am a/an:     (1A40)

[ ] 1. informed layman     (1A41)

[ ] 2. practitioner     (1A42)

[X] 3. expert     (1A43)

[ ] 4. other (please specify): (Not Answered)     (1A44)

Question 3a Ontology Value -     (1A45)

"support for semantic integration and automated reasoning"     (1A46)

Question 3b Ontology Issues -     (1A47)

"lack of rigorous ontologies for various domains intractability of reasoning"     (1A48)

Question 3c Ontology Problems -     (1A49)

"development of new ontologies verification and validation of existing ontologies"     (1A50)

Question 3d Corresponding Solutions -     (1A51)

"more coordination among existing research groups"     (1A52)

Question 4aGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:     (1A53)

Term: ontology     (1A54)

Gloss: vocabulary with specification of the meaning of the terms     (1A55)

Reference (citation/url): Uschold and Gruninger 1996     (1A56)

Artifact (name/version): (Not Answered)     (1A57)

- Artifact Ref. (url): (Not Answered)     (1A58)

Question 4a1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?     (1A59)

[ ] 1. 1 - totally unlikely     (1A60)

[ ] 2. 2 - rarely     (1A61)

[ ] 3. 3 - sometimes     (1A62)

[ ] 4. 4 - quite often     (1A63)

[X] 5. 5 - almost always     (1A64)

Question 4a2 Additional Remarks -     (1A65)

"This definition is intended to capture both the informal and formal     (1A66)

approaches to ontology. The differences between these approaches are     (1A67)

determined the language used to specify the meanings of the terms."     (1A68)

Question 4bGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:     (1A69)

Term: (Not Answered)     (1A70)

Gloss: (Not Answered)     (1A71)

Reference (citation/url): (Not Answered)     (1A72)

Artifact (name/version): Process Specification Language     (1A73)

Question 4b1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?     (1A75)

[ ] 1. 1 - totally unlikely     (1A76)

[ ] 2. 2 - rarely     (1A77)

[ ] 3. 3 - sometimes     (1A78)

[ ] 4. 4 - quite often     (1A79)

[X] 5. 5 - almost always     (1A80)

Question 4b2 Additional Remarks -     (1A81)

"PSL is a formal ontology axiomatized in Common Logic.     (1A82)

It is applied to support semantic integration among     (1A83)

process-related software applications, and it is also     (1A84)

applied to support automated reasoning (such as     (1A85)

verification of the consistency of business processes     (1A86)

and web service discovery)"     (1A87)

Question 4cGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:     (1A88)

Term: formal ontology     (1A89)

Gloss: Vocabulary of terms together with a set of expressions     (1A90)

in a formal logic (with syntax and model theory)     (1A91)

Reference (citation/url): (Not Answered)     (1A92)

Artifact (name/version): (Not Answered)     (1A93)

- Artifact Ref. (url): (Not Answered)     (1A94)

Question 4c1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?     (1A95)

[ ] 1. 1 - totally unlikely     (1A96)

[ ] 2. 2 - rarely     (1A97)

[ ] 3. 3 - sometimes     (1A98)

[ ] 4. 4 - quite often     (1A99)

[X] 5. 5 - almost always     (1A100)

Question 4c2 Additional Remarks -     (1A101)

"(Not Answered)"     (1A102)

Question 4dGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:     (1A103)

Term: (Not Answered)     (1A104)

Gloss: (Not Answered)     (1A105)

Reference (citation/url): (Not Answered)     (1A106)

Artifact (name/version): (Not Answered)     (1A107)

- Artifact Ref. (url): (Not Answered)     (1A108)

Question 4d1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?     (1A109)

[ ] 1. 1 - totally unlikely     (1A110)

[ ] 2. 2 - rarely     (1A111)

[ ] 3. 3 - sometimes     (1A112)

[ ] 4. 4 - quite often     (1A113)

[ ] 5. 5 - almost always     (1A114)

Question 4d2 Additional Remarks -     (1A115)

"(Not Answered)"     (1A116)

Question 4eGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:     (1A117)

Term: (Not Answered)     (1A118)

Gloss: (Not Answered)     (1A119)

Reference (citation/url): (Not Answered)     (1A120)

Artifact (name/version): (Not Answered)     (1A121)

- Artifact Ref. (url): (Not Answered)     (1A122)

Question 4e1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?     (1A123)

[ ] 1. 1 - totally unlikely     (1A124)

[ ] 2. 2 - rarely     (1A125)

[ ] 3. 3 - sometimes     (1A126)

[ ] 4. 4 - quite often     (1A127)

[ ] 5. 5 - almost always     (1A128)

Question 4e2 Additional Remarks -     (1A129)

"(Not Answered)"     (1A130)

Question 4fGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:     (1A131)

Term: (Not Answered)     (1A132)

Gloss: (Not Answered)     (1A133)

Reference (citation/url): (Not Answered)     (1A134)

Artifact (name/version): (Not Answered)     (1A135)

- Artifact Ref. (url): (Not Answered)     (1A136)

Question 4f1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?     (1A137)

[ ] 1. 1 - totally unlikely     (1A138)

[ ] 2. 2 - rarely     (1A139)

[ ] 3. 3 - sometimes     (1A140)

[ ] 4. 4 - quite often     (1A141)

[ ] 5. 5 - almost always     (1A142)

Question 4f2 Additional Remarks -     (1A143)

"(Not Answered)"     (1A144)

Question 4gGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:     (1A145)

Term: (Not Answered)     (1A146)

Gloss (definition): (Not Answered)     (1A147)

Reference (citation/url): (Not Answered)     (1A148)

Artifact (name/version): (Not Answered)     (1A149)

- Artifact Ref. (url): (Not Answered)     (1A150)

Question 4g1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?     (1A151)

[ ] 1. 1 - totally unlikely     (1A152)

[ ] 2. 2 - rarely     (1A153)

[ ] 3. 3 - sometimes     (1A154)

[ ] 4. 4 - quite often     (1A155)

[ ] 5. 5 - almost always     (1A156)

Question 4g2 Additional Remarks -     (1A157)

"(Not Answered)"     (1A158)

Question 4hGlossary - Ontology-related 'vocabulary' and representative 'artifact' from your constituency or community:     (1A159)

Term: (Not Answered)     (1A160)

Gloss: (Not Answered)     (1A161)

Reference (citation/url): (Not Answered)     (1A162)

Artifact (name/version): (Not Answered)     (1A163)

- Artifact Ref. (url): (Not Answered)     (1A164)

Question 4h1 Called An Ontology - On a scale of 1 to 5, (where 1 means totally unlikely and 5 means almost always), would the above term or artifact be referred to as an "ontology" in your community?     (1A165)

[ ] 1. 1 - totally unlikely     (1A166)

[ ] 2. 2 - rarely     (1A167)

[ ] 3. 3 - sometimes     (1A168)

[ ] 4. 4 - quite often     (1A169)

[ ] 5. 5 - almost always     (1A170)

Question 4h2 Additional Remarks -     (1A171)

"(Not Answered)"     (1A172)

Question 5 Confirm Participation - where,     (1A173)

a 'convener' is a participant who provides substantive contribution to the Ontology Summit 2007     (1A174)

initiative (through the online discourse, this survey, and other events leading to or during     (1A175)

the workshops and the written communique process), and     (1A176)

a 'co-sponsor' is an organization who is providing technical or funding support (e.g. supporting     (1A177)

member(s) of its technical staff to participate as a 'convener'), and/or endorsing the objective     (1A178)

[ ] I agree that my name can be listed as a 'convener' of Ontology Summit 2007     (1A180)

[ ] I will consider endorsing the Ontology Summit 2007 communique. Please send it to me for     (1A181)

review when it is ready. I will confirm my endorsement after the review.     (1A182)

[ ] I confirm that you may list my organization as a 'co-sponsor' for     (1A183)

Question 5a Co-Sponsor confirmation:     (1A185)

Organization Name: (Not Answered)     (1A186)

Link (url) to Logo: (Not Answered)     (1A187)



This page has been migrated from the OntologWiki - Click here for original page     (1A188)

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox
Share